Cyl Head Markings

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
Post Reply
User avatar
Texacoon
Donator
Donator
Posts: 27
Joined: November 3rd, 2008, 3:31 am

Cyl Head Markings

Post by Texacoon »

I'm interested in stroking my current 4.0L engine ('88) and found a person who is selling a '91 4.0L engine head. I asked what stamp numbers were on the head the only markings show "HNI" and "92".

My question is this the engine head that has better flow than pre-'91 or later (Y2K) 4.0L heads?
User avatar
Mgardiner1
Donator
Donator
Posts: 574
Joined: August 2nd, 2008, 6:19 pm
Stroker Displacement: 284 CI
Location: Wading River, NY

Re: Cyl Head Markings

Post by Mgardiner1 »

viewtopic.php?f=27&t=241

7120 head (91-95) is fabeled to be the best "stock" flowing head. I don't think anybody has ever proved it on a flow bench though
oletshot wrote:....and silvolites are only cast not hypericantspellits. :-)
User avatar
Texacoon
Donator
Donator
Posts: 27
Joined: November 3rd, 2008, 3:31 am

Re: Cyl Head Markings

Post by Texacoon »

Mgardiner1 wrote:http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... f=27&t=241

7120 head (91-95) is fabeled to be the best "stock" flowing head. I don't think anybody has ever proved it on a flow bench though

I would have thought it would say 7120 not HNI 92? How would one know if it doesn't have the full marking?
User avatar
John
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 709
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 8:35 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6
Location: West Virginia

Re: Cyl Head Markings

Post by John »

Jeep heads are identified by a casting number on top of the head above the #4 exhaust port, on the manifold side.
John
User avatar
gradon
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1353
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: DC

Re: Cyl Head Markings

Post by gradon »

0630 is just as good as the 7120 and now there is talk that the 0331(other than the crack-prone 2000) might be a good base to start a port and polish.
User avatar
Mgardiner1
Donator
Donator
Posts: 574
Joined: August 2nd, 2008, 6:19 pm
Stroker Displacement: 284 CI
Location: Wading River, NY

Re: Cyl Head Markings

Post by Mgardiner1 »

gradon wrote:0630 is just as good as the 7120 and now there is talk that the 0331(other than the crack-prone 2000) might be a good base to start a port and polish.
Exactly why i would never swear that one is better then the next. Was just stating the "rumor" for the 7120. I think if all casting heads were reworked the same way, that they would not prove more then 1 or 2% gains/loss on a dyno, which would be undetectable to most people.
oletshot wrote:....and silvolites are only cast not hypericantspellits. :-)
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Cyl Head Markings

Post by SilverXJ »

gradon wrote:0630 is just as good as the 7120 and now there is talk that the 0331(other than the crack-prone 2000) might be a good base to start a port and polish.
I wouldn't say that 2000 was the only crack proned year. I have heard that they fixed the casting in 2003.
User avatar
Alex22
Consistent
Consistent
Posts: 273
Joined: March 7th, 2008, 7:37 pm

Re: Cyl Head Markings

Post by Alex22 »

Mgardiner1 wrote:http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... f=27&t=241

7120 head (91-95) is fabeled to be the best "stock" flowing head. I don't think anybody has ever proved it on a flow bench though
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=245&start=0

The 0331 head was flowed on a different day than the 0721 head, but it does show the trends of the heads.
IIRC the exhaust port on the 0331 head was raised from where it was on the 0721. I'm interested to see when the changes were made to correct the cracking issue.

~Alex
The enemy of good thing is wanting something better.
User avatar
John
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 709
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 8:35 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6
Location: West Virginia

Re: Cyl Head Markings

Post by John »

SilverXJ wrote:
gradon wrote:0630 is just as good as the 7120 and now there is talk that the 0331(other than the crack-prone 2000) might be a good base to start a port and polish.
I wouldn't say that 2000 was the only crack proned year. I have heard that they fixed the casting in 2003.
And they did it discretely to avoid further publicizing a issue with a pending class action suit. Not a good time to publicly say "We fixed the problem that caused your failures." We would likely need to autopsy a pre and post change head to find the changes.
John
User avatar
1bolt
Donator
Donator
Posts: 545
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 4:06 pm
Location: Culpeper Virginia

Re: Cyl Head Markings

Post by 1bolt »

exactly what we're trying to do in the "0331 Head thread" in Tech. If anyone in here hasn't read it already go check it out we're trying to catalog any visible changes and arrive at some sort of consensus as to which 0331's crack and which don't... It seems safe bet that anything after 2004 or 2005 is an improved casting, but just when and how they improved it we have no sure clues about.
--
Simon
Looking for a 232 crankshaft see my want ad: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1292
http://www.jeepstrokers.com 94 XJ Stroked lifted locked. 89 MJ restored Work truck, 88 YJ going on third build up and second Stroker.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests