I'm interested in stroking my current 4.0L engine ('88) and found a person who is selling a '91 4.0L engine head. I asked what stamp numbers were on the head the only markings show "HNI" and "92".
My question is this the engine head that has better flow than pre-'91 or later (Y2K) 4.0L heads?
Cyl Head Markings
- Mgardiner1
- Donator
- Posts: 574
- Joined: August 2nd, 2008, 6:19 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 284 CI
- Location: Wading River, NY
Re: Cyl Head Markings
viewtopic.php?f=27&t=241
7120 head (91-95) is fabeled to be the best "stock" flowing head. I don't think anybody has ever proved it on a flow bench though
7120 head (91-95) is fabeled to be the best "stock" flowing head. I don't think anybody has ever proved it on a flow bench though
oletshot wrote:....and silvolites are only cast not hypericantspellits.![]()
- Texacoon
- Donator
- Posts: 27
- Joined: November 3rd, 2008, 3:31 am
Re: Cyl Head Markings
Mgardiner1 wrote:http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... f=27&t=241
7120 head (91-95) is fabeled to be the best "stock" flowing head. I don't think anybody has ever proved it on a flow bench though
I would have thought it would say 7120 not HNI 92? How would one know if it doesn't have the full marking?
- John
- I love JeepStrokers.com!!
- Posts: 709
- Joined: February 13th, 2008, 8:35 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6
- Location: West Virginia
Re: Cyl Head Markings
Jeep heads are identified by a casting number on top of the head above the #4 exhaust port, on the manifold side.
John
John
- gradon
- Donator
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
- Vehicle Year: 1996
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: DC
Re: Cyl Head Markings
0630 is just as good as the 7120 and now there is talk that the 0331(other than the crack-prone 2000) might be a good base to start a port and polish.
- Mgardiner1
- Donator
- Posts: 574
- Joined: August 2nd, 2008, 6:19 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 284 CI
- Location: Wading River, NY
Re: Cyl Head Markings
Exactly why i would never swear that one is better then the next. Was just stating the "rumor" for the 7120. I think if all casting heads were reworked the same way, that they would not prove more then 1 or 2% gains/loss on a dyno, which would be undetectable to most people.gradon wrote:0630 is just as good as the 7120 and now there is talk that the 0331(other than the crack-prone 2000) might be a good base to start a port and polish.
oletshot wrote:....and silvolites are only cast not hypericantspellits.![]()
- SilverXJ
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5790
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Radford, Va
Re: Cyl Head Markings
I wouldn't say that 2000 was the only crack proned year. I have heard that they fixed the casting in 2003.gradon wrote:0630 is just as good as the 7120 and now there is talk that the 0331(other than the crack-prone 2000) might be a good base to start a port and polish.
2000 XJ. 4.6L stroker
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
- Alex22
- Consistent
- Posts: 273
- Joined: March 7th, 2008, 7:37 pm
Re: Cyl Head Markings
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=245&start=0Mgardiner1 wrote:http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... f=27&t=241
7120 head (91-95) is fabeled to be the best "stock" flowing head. I don't think anybody has ever proved it on a flow bench though
The 0331 head was flowed on a different day than the 0721 head, but it does show the trends of the heads.
IIRC the exhaust port on the 0331 head was raised from where it was on the 0721. I'm interested to see when the changes were made to correct the cracking issue.
~Alex
The enemy of good thing is wanting something better.
- John
- I love JeepStrokers.com!!
- Posts: 709
- Joined: February 13th, 2008, 8:35 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6
- Location: West Virginia
Re: Cyl Head Markings
And they did it discretely to avoid further publicizing a issue with a pending class action suit. Not a good time to publicly say "We fixed the problem that caused your failures." We would likely need to autopsy a pre and post change head to find the changes.SilverXJ wrote:I wouldn't say that 2000 was the only crack proned year. I have heard that they fixed the casting in 2003.gradon wrote:0630 is just as good as the 7120 and now there is talk that the 0331(other than the crack-prone 2000) might be a good base to start a port and polish.
John
- 1bolt
- Donator
- Posts: 545
- Joined: January 18th, 2008, 4:06 pm
- Location: Culpeper Virginia
Re: Cyl Head Markings
exactly what we're trying to do in the "0331 Head thread" in Tech. If anyone in here hasn't read it already go check it out we're trying to catalog any visible changes and arrive at some sort of consensus as to which 0331's crack and which don't... It seems safe bet that anything after 2004 or 2005 is an improved casting, but just when and how they improved it we have no sure clues about.
--
Simon
Looking for a 232 crankshaft see my want ad: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1292
http://www.jeepstrokers.com 94 XJ Stroked lifted locked. 89 MJ restored Work truck, 88 YJ going on third build up and second Stroker.
Simon
Looking for a 232 crankshaft see my want ad: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1292
http://www.jeepstrokers.com 94 XJ Stroked lifted locked. 89 MJ restored Work truck, 88 YJ going on third build up and second Stroker.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 10 guests