Decking vs. thinner head gasket

Performance mods and Advanced Stroker discussion.
bratcop
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 88
Joined: October 14th, 2008, 8:45 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.5L
Location: Sheboygan, WI

Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket

Post by bratcop »

Victor makes a thinner MLS (Multi Layer Steel) head gasket for the 4.0. See here http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... ?f=5&t=472
It is Victor Part Number 54249S. I and another on the board here have mic'd it and it is .038 to .040. Obviously with a zero deck block, that would give you great quench numbers, but will also kick your compression up some....and of course don't forget to add the difference between stock and this gasket so you know how much you have to modify your valvetrain.

Bratcop
2001 GC Laredo
4.5 Stroker, 9.6 SCR, 8.1 DCR
Stock Valvetrain
24# Cobra Injectors
Bored Throttle Body
CAI
Ported and Polished 0331 Head
SplitSecond PSC1-003 Piggyback
Zeitroniz WideBand O2 logger
(all of this is still in the works as we speak)
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket

Post by SilverXJ »

Mgardiner1 wrote:the machinist can probably take .020 of the top of the valve stems without affecting retainer clearance.
I don't think taking that much of the stem off is a good idea. According to the FSM the most you can take off is .010".. past that and you will run the risk of getting into non-hardened valve stem.
User avatar
Mgardiner1
Donator
Donator
Posts: 574
Joined: August 2nd, 2008, 6:19 pm
Stroker Displacement: 284 CI
Location: Wading River, NY

Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket

Post by Mgardiner1 »

SilverXJ wrote:I don't think taking that much of the stem off is a good idea. According to the FSM the most you can take off is .010".. past that and you will run the risk of getting into non-hardened valve stem.
I stand corrected
oletshot wrote:....and silvolites are only cast not hypericantspellits. :-)
User avatar
Flash
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 693
Joined: February 17th, 2008, 10:45 pm

Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket

Post by Flash »

Mgardiner1 wrote:
SilverXJ wrote:I don't think taking that much of the stem off is a good idea. According to the FSM the most you can take off is .010".. past that and you will run the risk of getting into non-hardened valve stem.
I stand corrected
Just adding a little extra to this..................with a 1.6 rocker arm, it would have required .032" cut off of the valve tip for .020"deck or head shave................Which would affect the geometry of the rocker arm, even more then the shim under the rocker arm pivot. Rocker arm would be on a down hill slope, before it started to open the valve.


Flash
89 XJ with 300,000 on the original eng

"I've also never completed a motor, yet. My mouth (fingers) is also writing checks my ass can't cash."
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests