Decking vs. thinner head gasket
- SilverXJ
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5790
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Radford, Va
Decking vs. thinner head gasket
In my build I plan on setting deck clearance at 0 and use a .051" gasket to set my quench. The reason for using the .051" head gasket is because 1) the .041" head gasket is only available from carquest, 2) possibly no availability in the future 3) can not be had in a multi layer steel gasket. #2 also means is if I have to replace the head gasket for any reason in the future and i can't get a .041" gasket I will have a quench of .061"
So anyhow... is there anything bad about decking or my logic?
So anyhow... is there anything bad about decking or my logic?
2000 XJ. 4.6L stroker
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
- Mgardiner1
- Donator
- Posts: 574
- Joined: August 2nd, 2008, 6:19 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 284 CI
- Location: Wading River, NY
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
Just make sure the machinist measures everything properly. I asked for a 0 deck clearance, and the machinist claimed he left .002 in the hole, but it really worked out to be .009 (avg) deck height which i wasn't too crazy about, but not pissed off enough to remove all the parts again and bring it back to the machinist.
oletshot wrote:....and silvolites are only cast not hypericantspellits.![]()
- Alex22
- Consistent
- Posts: 273
- Joined: March 7th, 2008, 7:37 pm
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
I'm glad to see people planing ahead. We get customers who need work redone because one part or another is no longer available. Since you want a .051 quench height then I would just go with the thicker head gasket.SilverXJ wrote:In my build I plan on setting deck clearance at 0 and use a .051" gasket to set my quench. The reason for using the .051" head gasket is because 1) the .041" head gasket is only available from carquest, 2) possibly no availability in the future 3) can not be had in a multi layer steel gasket. #2 also means is if I have to replace the head gasket for any reason in the future and i can't get a .041" gasket I will have a quench of .061"
So anyhow... is there anything bad about decking or my logic?
Is there only one company making a .041 thick head gasket?
~Alex
The enemy of good thing is wanting something better.
- SilverXJ
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5790
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Radford, Va
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
As far as I know the only company that makes them is Victor-Reinz
2000 XJ. 4.6L stroker
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
- gradon
- Donator
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
- Vehicle Year: 1996
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: DC
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
Yeah the victor-reinz/mopar performance P4529242 is the .043" HG. I ordered the gasket tear down kit P4529245 thinking it was gonna come with the .043", but it ended up being a Fel Pro .051" HG with the crappy cork valve cover gasket and 3-piece cork oil pan gasket(didn't use). If I ever have to take the head off, I will find a .043"(if carquest in fact has it). I asked the machinist to remove .030" from the deck and it came out to be .028", so I have .010-.011" deck clearance +.051"HG=.061-.062" quench.
- SilverXJ
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5790
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Radford, Va
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
I purchased one from them about two months ago..gradon wrote: I will find a .043"(if carquest in fact has it).
2000 XJ. 4.6L stroker
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
- 1bolt
- Donator
- Posts: 545
- Joined: January 18th, 2008, 4:06 pm
- Location: Culpeper Virginia
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
Why not just zero deck either way? Whats the rod stretch going to be with stock con rods? .010 or .015? I'm asking here not stating... I seem to recall somewhere between .010" and .020"? There's nothing wrong with .041 quench... assuming your cam selection will allow the valves to clear... If not then machine some reliefs on the pistons
Also as others have noted already, the actual deck is going to end up proud of zero by a small bit anyway, because your machinist will likely only deck to the crown of the tallest (so to speak) piston and rod.

Also as others have noted already, the actual deck is going to end up proud of zero by a small bit anyway, because your machinist will likely only deck to the crown of the tallest (so to speak) piston and rod.
--
Simon
Looking for a 232 crankshaft see my want ad: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1292
http://www.jeepstrokers.com 94 XJ Stroked lifted locked. 89 MJ restored Work truck, 88 YJ going on third build up and second Stroker.
Simon
Looking for a 232 crankshaft see my want ad: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1292
http://www.jeepstrokers.com 94 XJ Stroked lifted locked. 89 MJ restored Work truck, 88 YJ going on third build up and second Stroker.
-
- Making Progress
- Posts: 64
- Joined: July 13th, 2008, 10:48 am
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
you will be fine with a steel rod with as much as a .035 quench. would not run any thing tighter. no real reason not to zero deck a motor anymore.
steve
steve
- John
- I love JeepStrokers.com!!
- Posts: 709
- Joined: February 13th, 2008, 8:35 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6
- Location: West Virginia
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
That is the best approach, .040 -.060 quench is considered good. Either gasket will fall within that range on a 0 decked engine. Careful piston selection/dish size and cam selection and you are on your way to a well thought out build. And you still have adjustments to quench and compression by gasket selection.1bolt wrote:Why not just zero deck either way?
John
- IH 392
- I love JeepStrokers.com!!
- Posts: 725
- Joined: October 4th, 2008, 11:15 am
- Location: Eugene ORYGUN
- Contact:
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
My Victor set# 95-3480VR has a the head gasket with # 5997 on the gasket, it measures .043 uncompressed, it says it's for '94-'95 year applications, it has the cork valve cover gasket, I haven't even looked to see if it's compatible with my late ('97) tin cover?
You can get more power out of ANY engine!!!
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
- seanyb505
- Donator
- Posts: 447
- Joined: February 16th, 2008, 9:34 am
- Stroker Displacement: 280ci
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: West Palm Beach Florida
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
Just remember zero decking the block will require custom shorter pushrods. Or do what I did - deck the block and head enough to equal a total of .060 and use a .060 shim for the rocker arms.
Now I can be like all those other awesome people with more than one Jeep in their sig, but now I have to say one of them is sold:(
97 XJ 4.6
90 MJ 4.0 - sold
I want to have as many Jeeps as children. DD, offroader, drag MJ and another one. 4=4
97 XJ 4.6
90 MJ 4.0 - sold
I want to have as many Jeeps as children. DD, offroader, drag MJ and another one. 4=4
- SilverXJ
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5790
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Radford, Va
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
I don't think it is.IH 392 wrote: it has the cork valve cover gasket, I haven't even looked to see if it's compatible with my late ('97) tin cover?
2000 XJ. 4.6L stroker
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
- SilverXJ
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5790
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Radford, Va
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
Harland Sharp adjustable roller rockers.seanyb505 wrote:Just remember zero decking the block will require custom shorter pushrods. Or do what I did - deck the block and head enough to equal a total of .060 and use a .060 shim for the rocker arms.
2000 XJ. 4.6L stroker
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
- Mgardiner1
- Donator
- Posts: 574
- Joined: August 2nd, 2008, 6:19 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 284 CI
- Location: Wading River, NY
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
If you take .020 off the deck of the block, the machinist can probably take .020 of the top of the valve stems without affecting retainer clearance.
oletshot wrote:....and silvolites are only cast not hypericantspellits.![]()
- Backwoods Rambler
- Noob
- Posts: 14
- Joined: September 30th, 2008, 9:48 pm
- Location: Brighton, CO
- Contact:
Re: Decking vs. thinner head gasket
Can anyone confirm this by measuring a loose valve stem they maybe have laying around?Mgardiner1 wrote:If you take .020 off the deck of the block, the machinist can probably take .020 of the top of the valve stems without affecting retainer clearance.
1998 XJ- Custom 4.5" suspension - 33" BFG MT's - Custom Bumpers - Custom Belly Skid - Custom Tire Carrier In Progress......Planning a stroker to help with the pop-up camper pulls,
Click HERE to Find out more about Project X-pedition
Click HERE to Find out more about Project X-pedition
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 61 guests