Similar, but Hesco's dumps the oil out the bottom. Also, I think they only recommend them with their 310* duration cam. Also, using different oil grades will change the way the cam behaves. I was tempted to try the cam, but I have enough sounds as it is.Randy_66 wrote:Those HESCO lifters you are talking about sound like Rhoads lifters, which have been around since at least the 70's.
505 Hydraulic Roller Package
- SilverXJ
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5790
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Radford, Va
Re: 505 Hydraulic Roller Package
2000 XJ. 4.6L stroker
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: 505 Hydraulic Roller Package
I'm very happy with the stock cam and I wouldn't change it. I know that'll come as a surprise but I'll explain why. Although WOT performance is slightly degraded (only 1-2 tenths slower to the 1/4 mile), there are several reasons why I like it:Randy_66 wrote:Dino, how does the stock cam with the stroker compare to the Crane you had been running?
1. Glass smooth idle with higher vacuum (21" stock cam v 17" Crane).
2. Valvetrain noise almost non-existent. When I ran the Crane cam with Mopar 5249464 springs, the engine had a noticeable tick at idle.
3. Part throttle response with the stock cam is better.
4. Gas mileage slightly improved with stock cam.
5. More torque with stock cam from idle to 1600rpm.
Don't be fooled by the modest-sounding dyno numbers. This engine feels like it puts down at least 200rwtq even when you only tickle the throttle and the response is neck-jerking. It's so effortless that I have to keep a close eye on the speedo to avoid getting caught by the speed cameras.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car

-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: June 26th, 2010, 7:00 am
- Stroker Displacement: 276
- Vehicle Year: 1999
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Re: 505 Hydraulic Roller Package
I never thought I'd say this, but I think I will stick with the stock cam. Sounds like the best bang for the buck longevity wise. I would have thought there would be more power difference.
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: 505 Hydraulic Roller Package
Yeah, I would have saved quite a lot of money if I'd built my stroker with the stock cam in the first place.Randy_66 wrote:I never thought I'd say this, but I think I will stick with the stock cam. Sounds like the best bang for the buck longevity wise.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car

-
- I made it to triple digits!
- Posts: 103
- Joined: January 12th, 2010, 1:11 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1994
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Re: 505 Hydraulic Roller Package
Cheromaniac: I read most these posts and have always had ONE Question for you, with you likeing the power with the STOCKER cam. Truth BE KNOWN, aren't you still running THOSE HIGH RATIO ROCKER ARMS you put in with the Crane cam?
If you are, it isn't like running a stock cam at all; it would have more lift and duration, right?
ALways wanted to ask that to you.
Don Jr
If you are, it isn't like running a stock cam at all; it would have more lift and duration, right?
ALways wanted to ask that to you.
Don Jr
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: 505 Hydraulic Roller Package
Don, the Yella Terra roller rockers that I'm using are the same 1.6 ratio as the stockers so the lift/duration is unchanged.
- amcinstaller
- I love JeepStrokers.com!!
- Posts: 631
- Joined: May 22nd, 2008, 11:57 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
- Vehicle Year: 1980
- Vehicle Make: AMC
- Vehicle Model: Spirit
- Location: Red Deer, AB, Can
Re: 505 Hydraulic Roller Package
maybe im lookin in the wrong place, but ive found 1.7 rockers kinda hard to come by 

1980 AMC Spirit Restomod
4.6 stroker/ax15/Ford 8.8
4.6 stroker/ax15/Ford 8.8
SilverXJ wrote:Roller rockers won't help that mess you have created. Nor will God for that matter.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 4 guests