Mopar springs

Performance mods and Advanced Stroker discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
StroktWJ
Donator
Donator
Posts: 54
Joined: April 27th, 2009, 11:40 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Grand Cher

Mopar springs

Post by StroktWJ »

Can you run factory retainers and locks with the Mopar Performance P5249464 springs? I have a set from 94 & 00.
2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee - 4.6L Stroker.
#727 Crank
Clevite 3415 Pistons
91-95 Camshaft
7120 Head
00 Intake
Magnaflow Muffler
Offroad Pipe
User avatar
RAPTORFAN85
Donator
Donator
Posts: 248
Joined: June 12th, 2008, 12:45 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2001
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: TJ
Location: Mass

Re: Mopar springs

Post by RAPTORFAN85 »

No you need P4452032 retainers to go with them. use the mopar locks as well, but make sure get the right ones for your valves. If its for the 2000 Then I think they are Three grooves not one groove like the older ones.
"Strrrrroke me, stoke me...."

Billy Squire
lafrad
Movin on up ^
Movin on up ^
Posts: 357
Joined: February 25th, 2009, 10:40 am

Re: Mopar springs

Post by lafrad »

I'm looking for the proper 3 groove locks to go with the mopar performance springs and retainers...

P5249464 - Spring
P4452032 - Retainer

Anyone have a part number for that?

I really want to keep the stock valves, if I can...
User avatar
gradon
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1353
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: DC

Re: Mopar springs

Post by gradon »

So on the 99+ they went to a 3-groove lock? I never heard anyone having issues with the single groove--wonder why they did it? Also(since I'm unfamiliar w/ the 0331 setup), are the valves still 1.92"in and 1.56"ex, with the exs being stainless?
yuppiexj
Donator
Donator
Posts: 319
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 7:31 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.5 needs assembly
Location: Fredercksburg VA (land of nothing)

Re: Mopar springs

Post by yuppiexj »

IIRC it was because all the dodges used that part and consolidation of part numbers would save them a few hundredths of a cent per piece.
TurboTom wrote:i will eat my words later if need be.
TurboTom wrote: Not sure of your rules...but you need to start with an engine that works best for the rules and cheat from there!
Proud owner of many stroker parts, that have not yet spontaneously assembled themselves.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 5 guests