ok so i've done a little searching around and i see mileage numbers all over the place. i recently rebuilt my 88 renix block and it runs pretty good but i'm contemplating either stroking the renix block or switching over to a obII h.o. block and stroking it. basically what i want is good power and better gas mileage with more tunability. would going with an obII setup work for the tunability or should i go the painless fuel management route? now i already have a 450 hp 350 in my truck for when i just wanna do stupid things and don't need anything outrageous in my jeep but i would like to see somewhere in the 250 hp 300 ftlb area and still get around 20 mpg. also keep in mind i'm running 5.5" of lift with 35's and 4.88 gears on an aw4/242.
are my desires even possible? what's the most power i can make and still keep the mpg in the 20 range? how much harder would it be to get to mid 20's like i saw some of your guys doing in the couple searches i made?
power to mileage
-
- I love this board
- Posts: 413
- Joined: March 30th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1988
- Vehicle Make: jeep
- Vehicle Model: cherokee
- Location: portland, tx
- 1bolt
- Donator
- Posts: 545
- Joined: January 18th, 2008, 4:06 pm
- Location: Culpeper Virginia
Re: power to mileage
hmmm the 5 inch lift, 35's and AW4 are going to make your chances of getting 20mpg pretty slim I imagine.
With 3.5 lift 33's (only 10.5 inches wide) 4.56's and AW4, all synthetic fluids, I've gotten 20mpg on occasion long freeway trips exclusively (4.6L with an RV cam) but normal driving it is much closer to 17-18 mpg.
My wifes stock 97 XJ with a scan gauge installed only manages a little over 20 MPG on the freeway as well. usually averages around 19mpg in normal driving... That's honest averaged MPG not your typical tall tale MPG. Like: Yeah i filled up with 10 gallons (really 12) and went about 300 miles (really 260) I've got mileage spread sheets for every vehicle I have for as long as I own it. I put the real mileage in and the exact gallons, and I fill up at the same pump when possible.
The main issue with Jeeps fuel economy wise really is aerodynamics they are bricks plain and simple. The 4 banger only gets a MPG or two better in the same vehicles.
With 3.5 lift 33's (only 10.5 inches wide) 4.56's and AW4, all synthetic fluids, I've gotten 20mpg on occasion long freeway trips exclusively (4.6L with an RV cam) but normal driving it is much closer to 17-18 mpg.
My wifes stock 97 XJ with a scan gauge installed only manages a little over 20 MPG on the freeway as well. usually averages around 19mpg in normal driving... That's honest averaged MPG not your typical tall tale MPG. Like: Yeah i filled up with 10 gallons (really 12) and went about 300 miles (really 260) I've got mileage spread sheets for every vehicle I have for as long as I own it. I put the real mileage in and the exact gallons, and I fill up at the same pump when possible.
The main issue with Jeeps fuel economy wise really is aerodynamics they are bricks plain and simple. The 4 banger only gets a MPG or two better in the same vehicles.
--
Simon
Looking for a 232 crankshaft see my want ad: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1292
http://www.jeepstrokers.com 94 XJ Stroked lifted locked. 89 MJ restored Work truck, 88 YJ going on third build up and second Stroker.
Simon
Looking for a 232 crankshaft see my want ad: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1292
http://www.jeepstrokers.com 94 XJ Stroked lifted locked. 89 MJ restored Work truck, 88 YJ going on third build up and second Stroker.
-
- Movin on up ^
- Posts: 357
- Joined: February 25th, 2009, 10:40 am
Re: power to mileage
well, depending on where you drive, a stroker can help with mileage... more torque to hold a gear, instead of shifting, helps QUITE a bit.
Also, dial that compression ratio up far as you can go on your fuel of choice, and there is extra MPG.
20 mpg with a lift and aggressive gears/tires? well... lets just stick with: mileage will probably be *better* with a stroker. no number guarantees
Now, about how to run the engine.
Stay away from OBD if you can. get the new block, optimized head, exhaust.... all the physical, engine parts... get a nice after market PCM with sequential fuel injection and the ability to control spark (if you can swing it, go for the distributor less stuff... it just plain runs better). After market lets you FULLY tune the engine, and that will give you great MPG AND power/drivability... OBDII will just limit you to how a stock OBDII vehicle behaves.
Also, dial that compression ratio up far as you can go on your fuel of choice, and there is extra MPG.
20 mpg with a lift and aggressive gears/tires? well... lets just stick with: mileage will probably be *better* with a stroker. no number guarantees
Now, about how to run the engine.
Stay away from OBD if you can. get the new block, optimized head, exhaust.... all the physical, engine parts... get a nice after market PCM with sequential fuel injection and the ability to control spark (if you can swing it, go for the distributor less stuff... it just plain runs better). After market lets you FULLY tune the engine, and that will give you great MPG AND power/drivability... OBDII will just limit you to how a stock OBDII vehicle behaves.
-
- I love this board
- Posts: 413
- Joined: March 30th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1988
- Vehicle Make: jeep
- Vehicle Model: cherokee
- Location: portland, tx
Re: power to mileage
thanks for the replies.
now for aftermarket computers who should i be looking at? i know painless has 1 and so does edelbrock and holley if you buy their fuel injection kits
now for aftermarket computers who should i be looking at? i know painless has 1 and so does edelbrock and holley if you buy their fuel injection kits
- Shark
- Consistent
- Posts: 268
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 8:51 pm
- Location: Tampa Bay
Re: power to mileage
pardon my ignorance but why go though the troulbe and expense of an aftermarket computer instead of just a MAP adjuster?shawnxj wrote:thanks for the replies.
now for aftermarket computers who should i be looking at? i know painless has 1 and so does edelbrock and holley if you buy their fuel injection kits
'91 MJ 4.0 ax15 Resto-mod street truck project, stroker candidate
'93 XJ 2door 4.0 aw4 np231 7" lift 33's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 2" 31's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 np231 4" lift 31's RIP
'93 XJ 2door 4.0 aw4 np231 7" lift 33's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 2" 31's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 np231 4" lift 31's RIP
- RAPTORFAN85
- Donator
- Posts: 248
- Joined: June 12th, 2008, 12:45 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
- Vehicle Year: 2001
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: TJ
- Location: Mass
Re: power to mileage
With an aftermarket computer you get more controlability (if thats a word) then with just a MAP adjuster. The MAP adjuster changes the values over the whole RPM range. A system like the Apexi for example can change the AFR at certain points in the RPM range. Say that you had a lean spot at 2500-3500 RPM, you could dial in more fuel just in that RPM range, not over the whole RPM range like a MAP adjuster would do...tigerShark wrote: pardon my ignorance but why go though the troulbe and expense of an aftermarket computer instead of just a MAP adjuster?
"Strrrrroke me, stoke me...."
Billy Squire
Billy Squire
-
- Movin on up ^
- Posts: 357
- Joined: February 25th, 2009, 10:40 am
Re: power to mileage
well, in closed loop mode, no matter WHAT computer you use... you will have the same fuel consumption per RPM per MAP pressure.
Where a standalone is nice, is having a custom timing map. That can give you MUCH better mileage if you can optimize timing in your high-vac cruising areas.
Where a standalone is nice, is having a custom timing map. That can give you MUCH better mileage if you can optimize timing in your high-vac cruising areas.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 2 guests