My current engine (pre-stroker) has the factory TJ-style air intake tube that crosses over the top of the engine and factory air box and "trumpet".
I was about to pull the trigger on ordering a CAI (either the aFe Momentum GT or the Banks Ram Air) until I started reading info on multiple sites about the downsides of these style filters in letting more dust pass through vs. stock filters. Also, the claims were made that the stock system is plenty sufficient for the needs of these engines. The numbers I've seen is that the STOCK throttle body can flow 450 cfm, which is more than enough for a stock engine or even a stroker, according to the CFM calculations. (I have yet to find CFM specs on the stock air intake tube/air box, but read that it supposedly is close to the flow of the stock TB.

So, just for giggles, if you do the math on CFM needs of an engine, the formula would be CID x RPM (redline)/3456=CFM at 100% volumetric efficiency (VE), at which none of our engines operate. It seems the general consensus is that stock engines operate at +/- 85% VE. I have read that our strokers are more along the lines of 87-88% VE.
Even so, for worst case scenario, let's do the calculation at 100% VE. for a 4.7 stroker, it would be 287 cid x 5200 rpm= 1,492,400/3456= 432 CFM at 100% VE. (And my engine will NEVER see any RPM above 4500 as long as I own it.)
So is my understanding of this correct? - that no matter what size CAI or throttle body we want to throw on there, the max CFM that this engine could possibly flow would be that 432? At that point, it's just a matter of knowing it the stock tube is restrictive below that point, I guess.
I'm not trying to argue any position one way or the other here. I'm truly seeking any relevant information on whether or not a stock system could provide the CFM needed for my engine or if a CAI is even a worthwhile expense. I admit my very limited understanding of this, and, unfortunately, there are so many contradictory information (well, seems to be mostly people's opinions presented as fact) on the science of this.