parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
crustodd
Donator
Donator
Posts: 146
Joined: November 18th, 2008, 4:29 pm
Stroker Displacement: 284
Vehicle Year: 1994
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ

parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by crustodd »

Hey Jeepers,
I just did this on my new 4.7 and so far it's VERY NICE. I found a couple of complete manifolds w/injectors and rails, one w/T-body, and maybe the power steering pumps and brackets too (the tricky to find part). Decent prices. Anybody interested? I thought about snaggin' them this weekend if anybody is planning this swap and would like the whole setup. Let me know.

Todd
crustodd
Donator
Donator
Posts: 146
Joined: November 18th, 2008, 4:29 pm
Stroker Displacement: 284
Vehicle Year: 1994
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by crustodd »

I'll state this more clearly,
DO ANYONE NEED THE PARTS TO DO THIS SWAP??? It's good for about 15 HP, more with a cold air and a bored TB. Just checkin.

crust1
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by SilverXJ »

How much do you want for one?
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3263
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by Cheromaniac »

crustodd wrote:I'll state this more clearly,
DO ANYONE NEED THE PARTS TO DO THIS SWAP??? It's good for about 15 HP, more with a cold air and a bored TB. Just checkin.

crust1
I don't know where this 15hp claim keeps coming from but it's BS. The actual gain is more like 3hp/5lbft at the wheels. Still, it's nice to have the newer PS pump set up which makes changing the drivebelt and adjusting its tension much easier.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
crustodd
Donator
Donator
Posts: 146
Joined: November 18th, 2008, 4:29 pm
Stroker Displacement: 284
Vehicle Year: 1994
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by crustodd »

Hey Dino,
Comanche91 posted a 12 hp gain on the dyno on his 4.5 and DJJordache on MallCrawlin.com posted a 26.9 rear wheel dyno gain on his 4.0 93 Grand with a ported and polished big valve head. Even if ya' took a low average, it's gotta' be more than 3hp, seems like.

T
User avatar
amcinstaller
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 633
Joined: May 22nd, 2008, 11:57 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1980
Vehicle Make: AMC
Vehicle Model: Spirit
Location: Red Deer, AB, Can

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by amcinstaller »

maybe this should be in the "for sale" section perhaps????
1980 AMC Spirit Restomod
4.6 stroker/ax15/Ford 8.8
SilverXJ wrote:Roller rockers won't help that mess you have created. Nor will God for that matter.
User avatar
seanyb505
Donator
Donator
Posts: 447
Joined: February 16th, 2008, 9:34 am
Stroker Displacement: 280ci
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: West Palm Beach Florida

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by seanyb505 »

The only reason the mallcrawlin writeup had 26 hp was because newer injectors were switched in for older, shotty injectors. On a stock head Dino's right, but you have to start throwing other stuff to take more advantage of it. If you're selling or trying to sell something, put it in for sale.
Now I can be like all those other awesome people with more than one Jeep in their sig, but now I have to say one of them is sold:(
97 XJ 4.6
90 MJ 4.0 - sold

I want to have as many Jeeps as children. DD, offroader, drag MJ and another one. 4=4
crustodd
Donator
Donator
Posts: 146
Joined: November 18th, 2008, 4:29 pm
Stroker Displacement: 284
Vehicle Year: 1994
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by crustodd »

Hey guys,
I was just tryin ' to help other forum members out. I had a difficult time trying to find these parts used and had to buy the manifold new. If nobody needs the parts, so be it. No need to get riled :roll:
User avatar
Comanche91
Donator
Donator
Posts: 156
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 4:51 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1991
Vehicle Make: JeeP
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Sweet Home Alabama

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by Comanche91 »

Cheromaniac wrote:I don't know where this 15hp claim keeps coming from but it's BS. The actual gain is more like 3hp/5lbft at the wheels. Still, it's nice to have the newer PS pump set up which makes changing the drivebelt and adjusting its tension much easier.
No BS Cheromaniac. Check the dyno sheets, page 2:

http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... 7&start=15

When in doubt, DYNO. Agree on the easier belt changing and adjusting; much better.
91 Comanche LWB, AW4, Hesco 4.6L, D44 Trac-lok, CHROME freak, ROLL TIDE
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3263
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by Cheromaniac »

crustodd wrote:Hey Dino,
Comanche91 posted a 12 hp gain on the dyno on his 4.5 and DJJordache on MallCrawlin.com posted a 26.9 rear wheel dyno gain on his 4.0 93 Grand with a ported and polished big valve head. Even if ya' took a low average, it's gotta' be more than 3hp, seems like.
DJJordache's 4.0 was down on power with the old injectors and probably most of the HP gain was from swapping in newer injectors as well as the manifold. Comanche91's 12rwhp/12rwtq gain does look genuine though but I don't think that'll be representative of a stockish 4.0. I know Mr. Shoeboy (Aaron) dyno'd his 4.6 stroker before and after installing the newer manifold with no other changes. The difference was only 3rwhp/5rwtq.
That said, you've got to wonder why the '00-'01 4.0 XJ with the newer manifold was only rated 3hp/6lbft higher than it's predecessor, especially when DC claimed 2hp of that gain was from the new water pump. The only other change apart from the ignition system (no HP gain there) was the 0331 head. If the 12hp gain really was representative of what the newer manifold achieves, then the 0331 head must produce an 11hp loss. Somehow I seriously doubt that and that's the reason for my skepticism.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
User avatar
Comanche91
Donator
Donator
Posts: 156
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 4:51 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1991
Vehicle Make: JeeP
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Sweet Home Alabama

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by Comanche91 »

Cheromaniac wrote:DJJordache's 4.0 was down on power with the old injectors and probably most of the HP gain was from swapping in newer injectors as well as the manifold. Comanche91's 12rwhp/12rwtq gain does look genuine though but I don't think that'll be representative of a stockish 4.0. I know Mr. Shoeboy (Aaron) dyno'd his 4.6 stroker before and after installing the newer manifold with no other changes. The difference was only 3rwhp/5rwtq.
That said, you've got to wonder why the '00-'01 4.0 XJ with the newer manifold was only rated 3hp/6lbft higher than it's predecessor, especially when DC claimed 2hp of that gain was from the new water pump. The only other change apart from the ignition system (no HP gain there) was the 0331 head. If the 12hp gain really was representative of what the newer manifold achieves, then the 0331 head must produce an 11hp loss. Somehow I seriously doubt that and that's the reason for my skepticism.
I didn't know you were Cheromaniac Dino. Your handle fits. :D I have the 0630 head and did some slight polishing around the manifold intake ports (just to take out the casting bumps), so maybe that helped. Plus the old dyno readings were with the mechanical fan, I now have two electrics (as you know), so maybe that helped a bit too. Don
91 Comanche LWB, AW4, Hesco 4.6L, D44 Trac-lok, CHROME freak, ROLL TIDE
User avatar
gradon
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1353
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: DC

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by gradon »

Regardless of the diff #'s posted, it's a worthwhile upgrade and will contribute to power across the band. If you look at the two side by side, you can clearly see that the newer design promotes smoother, more equal flow to all cylinders--not the inside cylinders getting the most direct flow and the outsides having to travel farther and hit a 90* bend, not to mention the volume diffs(2.6l vs 4.3l). The 0331 head w/ the precat manifold lost power and the intake made up for that plus some.
User avatar
IH 392
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 725
Joined: October 4th, 2008, 11:15 am
Location: Eugene ORYGUN
Contact:

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by IH 392 »

I slapped a 62mm TB on mine at the same time and the "seat of the pants" dyno showed a noticeable improvement on my 137,000 4.0. :cheers:
You can get more power out of ANY engine!!!
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3263
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by Cheromaniac »

gradon wrote:Regardless of the diff #'s posted, it's a worthwhile upgrade and will contribute to power across the band. If you look at the two side by side, you can clearly see that the newer design promotes smoother, more equal flow to all cylinders--not the inside cylinders getting the most direct flow and the outsides having to travel farther and hit a 90* bend, not to mention the volume diffs(2.6l vs 4.3l). The 0331 head w/ the precat manifold lost power and the intake made up for that plus some.
OK, the '00 0331 head lost 4hp compared to the '99 0630 head but the '00+ water pump gained 2hp. The camshafts were the same in both the '99 and '00 engines. Since the '00 engine was rated at 193hp compared to 190hp for the '99 engine, that's a net 5hp gain from the '00+ intake manifold (1hp more than the head lost).
Sounds about right since Comanche91's 12hp gain included port-matching the head and the electric fan conversion. Is it worth it? I'd still say yes for the reasons I mentioned in my first post.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3263
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: parts for '99-newer intake upgrade

Post by Cheromaniac »

My long search for a '99+ intake manifold is over. I scored a bare manifold from a junkyard today for a mere $54 so I'm very happy. I just need to find a '97+ XJ PS pump and I'll be ready to go with the conversion. I'll be reusing my existing Ford Racing 24lb injectors and the stock '92 injector rail/fuel lines.
I'm going to gasket match the runners and port them around the injector bosses (especially runners 2-5) to improve airflow. Hopefully this thing will rock.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 84 guests