Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Performance mods and Advanced Stroker discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
ruffy01
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 55
Joined: February 4th, 2013, 6:28 pm
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Post by ruffy01 »

I refined my methods a little & updated head flow spec's with SilverXJ's recommendation.
With each sim' run SCR was altered (cam specific) to achieve a DCR ~8.3:1.

1st up: Comp cams
COMP CAMS.jpg
2ndly: 505Performance Cams & Comp Cams 239-4
COMP 239 & 505P CAMS.jpg
Interestingly, Comp Cams 239-4 & 505Perf Cams 263-265 14H are almost identical with this sim.
From a user POV the 505 cam could be run with stock valve springs (0.427/0.438 Lift) Vs the 239-4 (0.493/0.512 Lift) which definitely needs aftermarket.
The other spec's on these two are:
263/265: IVC=65.5*, LSA=114*, Overlap=36*
239-4: IVC=58.0*,LSA=111*, Overlap=44*
So a higher SCR with the 263/265 cam's late IVC also.

The 505Perf 272/280 14H sacrifices a little low down torque but catches very quickly with a very flat early curve. Nice HP too.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
CobraMarty
BANNED
BANNED
Posts: 297
Joined: December 3rd, 2011, 2:01 am
Vehicle Year: 1998
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Post by CobraMarty »

The gains are mostly between 4000-5000rpm. How often are you in that rpm range? If you have an auto that shifts at 4800-4850rpm, whats the point?
1998 XJ 2D AW4 32"MTR 3.55 4.5"RC JCR Slider Magnaflow 150rwHP/174rwTQ=> Sprintex SC Gibson Header 6lb 120-140*IAT 211rwHP/274rwTQ WasherFluid Inj 70mmTB 7.5lb 100-120*IAT=>Now 12 pounds Boost=> +BV ported head
99 XJ M62 S/C
FlyinRyan
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 157
Joined: October 5th, 2012, 9:00 pm
Location: Houston area, Texas
Contact:

Re: Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Post by FlyinRyan »

I would avoid ANYTHING from 505.....
Flyin' Ryan Performance
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Post by SilverXJ »

You would get a better view if your limit the plot RPM to 5000. Enter ALL the data for the camshaft, seat to seat and .050" numbers. Then compare between the two. This will also help DD calculate the ramp rates
BDD
I think I'll order a "tab"
I think I'll order a "tab"
Posts: 42
Joined: February 11th, 2011, 6:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6
Vehicle Year: 1998
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: tj

Re: Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Post by BDD »

FlyinRyan wrote:I would avoid ANYTHING from 505.....
Care to elaborate?
I havn't been on the site for awhile. I have used 505 and had nothing but great service and six cylinders that beat up v8s. Am I missing something?

I am really interested to hear what you have to say as I was concidering your tuning services. Thanks
User avatar
ruffy01
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 55
Joined: February 4th, 2013, 6:28 pm
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Post by ruffy01 »

CobraMarty wrote:The gains are mostly between 4000-5000rpm. How often are you in that rpm range? If you have an auto that shifts at 4800-4850rpm, whats the point?
It was simply a 'have a look & see' exercise Marty :D
No good for my needs.
User avatar
ruffy01
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 55
Joined: February 4th, 2013, 6:28 pm
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Post by ruffy01 »

SilverXJ wrote:You would get a better view if your limit the plot RPM to 5000. Enter ALL the data for the camshaft, seat to seat and .050" numbers. Then compare between the two. This will also help DD calculate the ramp rates
Thanks Silver, I did enter all the .050" data but it disappears after saving, not on all cams though :?
I shall narrow down the RPM range.
User avatar
ruffy01
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 55
Joined: February 4th, 2013, 6:28 pm
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Post by ruffy01 »

FlyinRyan wrote:I would avoid ANYTHING from 505.....
As BDD asked, I'm also curious.
I've read negatives about their rollers but not their other profiles.
I'm still checking out other cams but I quite like 505's 263/265-14H vs Comp's 239-4:
239-4 vs 263-265.jpg
They appear almost identical (according to the Sim' of course, real world may be different)
I could run factory valve springs with the 505 cam but not Comp's 239-4.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Post by SilverXJ »

Search on here for 505 issues. Bad service, bad packaging, failures, etc.

As for DD not saving both the seat to seat and .050 figures I ran into that problem as well. I believe something else changes in the cam manager that has to match when you do the other figures. I can't recall exactly though.
User avatar
ruffy01
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 55
Joined: February 4th, 2013, 6:28 pm
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Post by ruffy01 »

SilverXJ wrote:Search on here for 505 issues. Bad service, bad packaging, failures, etc.

As for DD not saving both the seat to seat and .050 figures I ran into that problem as well. I believe something else changes in the cam manager that has to match when you do the other figures. I can't recall exactly though.
Thanks mate.
I just re-entered the .050" data, saved, closed & re-opened; gone!
It holds the data as long as the session is open.

I've found a few negatives on 505, damn shame, I do like their profiles.
I'll look a bit closer at Erson, Hesco & Crane too.
scalper
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 61
Joined: June 20th, 2009, 9:07 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.7l
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: cherokee
Location: santa fe tx

Re: Refined Cam Sim comparisons

Post by scalper »

FlyinRyan wrote:I would avoid ANYTHING from 505.....
x2
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cheromaniac, Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 4 guests