Hi I found this stroker kit for 2.8L GM engines and I was wondering if it was worth the money. I was also wondering what kind of power I should get out of this kit. I have a 1986 Jeep Comanche and 289,XXX miles so the hills are getting hard to climb. My other concern is gas mileage. The link is here and it is a complete rebuild kit with a stroker cam... Any help would be great.
http://www.engine-parts.com/GMV6/gmv6ps1.html
Thanks
frankthetank07
2.8 to 3.1 A.R.I. stroker kit questions
- Flash
- I love JeepStrokers.com!!
- Posts: 693
- Joined: February 17th, 2008, 10:45 pm
Re: 2.8 to 3.1 A.R.I. stroker kit questions
That's a vary interesting idea, for those that have the 2.8 v6 in there jeep. and stroking that gutless 2.8, is a Grate concept
Unfortunately, i don't thing there is many of us that have dabbled with this Type of stroker.
Our knowledge around here is with the 4.0/258.
If you decide to go this route, let us know how it turns out.
Flash

Unfortunately, i don't thing there is many of us that have dabbled with this Type of stroker.
Our knowledge around here is with the 4.0/258.
If you decide to go this route, let us know how it turns out.
Flash
89 XJ with 300,000 on the original eng
"I've also never completed a motor, yet. My mouth (fingers) is also writing checks my ass can't cash."
"I've also never completed a motor, yet. My mouth (fingers) is also writing checks my ass can't cash."
- Muad'Dib
- Site Admin / Owner
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: January 8th, 2008, 10:55 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
Re: 2.8 to 3.1 A.R.I. stroker kit questions
Wouldnt it be cheaper to just swap in a stock 4.0? Wouldnt you get the same or more power out of the stock i6 then a stroked v6?
I would assume the reason why most people havent done this is because its cheaper and better to just swap in a 4.0... stock or stroked either way.
I would assume the reason why most people havent done this is because its cheaper and better to just swap in a 4.0... stock or stroked either way.
If it feels right, then STROKE it!
- Shark
- Consistent
- Posts: 268
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 8:51 pm
- Location: Tampa Bay
Re: 2.8 to 3.1 A.R.I. stroker kit questions
i totally agree.Muad'Dib wrote:Wouldnt it be cheaper to just swap in a stock 4.0? Wouldnt you get the same or more power out of the stock i6 then a stroked v6?
I would assume the reason why most people havent done this is because its cheaper and better to just swap in a 4.0... stock or stroked either way.
'91 MJ 4.0 ax15 Resto-mod street truck project, stroker candidate
'93 XJ 2door 4.0 aw4 np231 7" lift 33's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 2" 31's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 np231 4" lift 31's RIP
'93 XJ 2door 4.0 aw4 np231 7" lift 33's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 2" 31's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 np231 4" lift 31's RIP
- gradon
- Donator
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
- Vehicle Year: 1996
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: DC
Re: 2.8 to 3.1 A.R.I. stroker kit questions
You'd be better off finding a 3.4 or 3.8 v6 out of a camaro/firebird than paying $1500-3300 on a stroker kit for the 2.8. If you go the 4.0 route, you'll need to modify the engine bay/firewall and make sure you get it complete with wiring and ecu.
Last edited by gradon on June 3rd, 2008, 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Shark
- Consistent
- Posts: 268
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 8:51 pm
- Location: Tampa Bay
Re: 2.8 to 3.1 A.R.I. stroker kit questions
what tranny do those '86 'manches have? you might even be able to swap in 4.3.
'91 MJ 4.0 ax15 Resto-mod street truck project, stroker candidate
'93 XJ 2door 4.0 aw4 np231 7" lift 33's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 2" 31's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 np231 4" lift 31's RIP
'93 XJ 2door 4.0 aw4 np231 7" lift 33's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 2" 31's
'95 XJ 4door 4.0 aw4 np231 4" lift 31's RIP
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot] and 3 guests