anybody running a 63502 or 63501? what's your thoughts on them? they have a lumpy idle or does 1 or both have a smooth idle. the 63502 puts me at a scr of 9.44 and a dcr of 7.9 and the 63501 puts me at scr 9.44 with a dcr of 8.05. my quench will be .043.
i'm looking for a smooth cam with good low end torque and with the issues i've been hearing about with comp cams i'm leaning towards the lunati's cause my buddy has never had a problems with them in his v8's
lunati cams
-
- I love this board
- Posts: 413
- Joined: March 30th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1988
- Vehicle Make: jeep
- Vehicle Model: cherokee
- Location: portland, tx
-
- I made it to triple digits!
- Posts: 126
- Joined: July 9th, 2008, 11:07 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Wrangler
Re: lunati cams
I have a 63502 and will be assembling my stroker over the next few weeks. I'll let you know how it works out. I really like what my desktop dyno showed me for the 63502. If you check one of my other threads I have a snapshot from my DD comparing the 63502 to a comp 201-4. The comp 201 has almost the same curve has the lunati 63501 (with the lunati being SLIGHTY higher, so slight it just looks like a thicker line).
97 TJ - 4.7L - Lunati 63502 ftw
-
- I love this board
- Posts: 413
- Joined: March 30th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1988
- Vehicle Make: jeep
- Vehicle Model: cherokee
- Location: portland, tx
Re: lunati cams
i've been considering it for awhile but your dd numbers kinda convinced me and when i ran it on my dd i liked it even more. i am still considering the 63501 though
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 3 guests