composite lifters

Performance mods and Advanced Stroker discussion.
Post Reply
jcsj
Where's the "any" key?
Where's the "any" key?
Posts: 25
Joined: April 3rd, 2009, 5:55 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.7
Vehicle Year: 1978
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: cj-5
Location: Maine

composite lifters

Post by jcsj »

I did a search found some info and was wondering if any one had tried them or had more info. thanks
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: composite lifters

Post by SilverXJ »

I looked into the Schubeck (sp?) lifters. They need a higher rate spring and they cost too much. IIRC it was around $400 for a set. They are interesting, an wouldn't mind trying them if they really stop cam failures.. but I haven't heard enough info on them

http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... ?f=5&t=314

http://www.4secondsflat.com/Composite%20lifters.htm
SIXPAK
Consistent
Consistent
Posts: 218
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 5:34 am
Stroker Displacement: 280

Re: composite lifters

Post by SIXPAK »

I have a set of full ceramics Schubecks in mine, not composite. Bought them to reduce valvetrain weight and have the ability to change cams and NOT change lifters. They can be used over and over from cam to cam. Running 205 seat and 505 open. If I ever need to buy another set I will buy the ones from Four seconds flat. Talked with the man who actually makes them and he used to work for Schubeck. Most of the problems with the original composite Schubecks were a lack of quality control when it comes to tolerances. New ones out, are golden IMO.
tirod
Learning to use the board
Learning to use the board
Posts: 34
Joined: March 6th, 2008, 9:39 am
Vehicle Year: 1990
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: composite lifters

Post by tirod »

Roller versions now available.

Yes, the price is high - for street lifters. The benefits are almost unbelievable considering the tappet problems the last few years. Reusable on any lobe, any cam, no ZDDP necessary, and on the rollers, no needle bearings.

I wonder which factory will use them stock first.

A set of these on a reground stock cam could almost be affordable compared to a custom billet roller - and you have less problems long term. Long run, they will get cheaper. Racers will move this way to reduce engine failure.

I'm sold. :banana:

I'm also looking into DLC coating stock lifters. Reputed to be the similar stuff, same results.
jcsj
Where's the "any" key?
Where's the "any" key?
Posts: 25
Joined: April 3rd, 2009, 5:55 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.7
Vehicle Year: 1978
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: cj-5
Location: Maine

Re: composite lifters

Post by jcsj »

SIXPAK what is your installed spring height? thanks
SIXPAK
Consistent
Consistent
Posts: 218
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 5:34 am
Stroker Displacement: 280

Re: composite lifters

Post by SIXPAK »

Not exactly sure on the number but it should be close to 1.650. Coil bind by the book was 1.115,+ .500 lift, = 1.615, turns out around .035 before coil bind. This gave use what we wanted for pressure very close to coil bind, just what the doctor ordered! Actual numbers from what the book said varied slightly on the springs as normal.
jcsj
Where's the "any" key?
Where's the "any" key?
Posts: 25
Joined: April 3rd, 2009, 5:55 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.7
Vehicle Year: 1978
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: cj-5
Location: Maine

Re: composite lifters

Post by jcsj »

thank you SIXPAK there is a post on the hesco forum under '' another worn out distributer gear'' page five Lee Hurly as some insight on lobe width stock and after market. Also some info on the stock valve springs and their limitations. I think I will start a FAQ on springs I have some info and will try to put something togather in the next few days and I'm sure some of you have much more info to add.
User avatar
PolloLoco
Donator
Donator
Posts: 212
Joined: March 8th, 2009, 6:39 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: TJ
Location: DeRidder, LA

Re: composite lifters

Post by PolloLoco »

jcsj wrote:thank you SIXPAK there is a post on the hesco forum under '' another worn out distributer gear'' page five Lee Hurly as some insight on lobe width stock and after market. Also some info on the stock valve springs and their limitations. I think I will start a FAQ on springs I have some info and will try to put something togather in the next few days and I'm sure some of you have much more info to add.
Can you please post a link? I don't go to the Hesco forum but I want to read the discussion about cam lobe width.
4.7L Stroker, 4.88 Ford 8.8 w/Auburn ECTED, HP30 w/ARB, AX-15, NP231 w/RR SYE, 33x10.50 BFG A/T, 4" Skyjacker, 1" body lift, 1" MORE motor mounts, Kilby fuel tank skid, UCF ultra-high clearance 1/4" skid, HMMWV-style snorkel, 63mm TB
User avatar
gradon
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1353
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: DC

Re: composite lifters

Post by gradon »

Hesco has some good info and should be used for research on stroker/jeep mods.
User avatar
John
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 709
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 8:35 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6
Location: West Virginia

Re: composite lifters

Post by John »

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], mpgMike and 7 guests