Opinions on These Strokers?

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
ech0sh4y
Noob
Noob
Posts: 10
Joined: June 22nd, 2009, 6:44 pm
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by ech0sh4y »

Hey guys, long story short, I'm in need of a new 4.0... my blew a rod and grenaded the innards. I have a Gm 350 v8 (carb) sitting in the garage with 14,000 miles on it that is itching to go in, but I am thinking that stroker is the smart of the two choices. I really don't know much about building motors and figured on buying a long block. I've seen the Golen is top of the line, but I think I could do a v8 for less then the cost of that motor. I found these two today, any opinions?


Hammerhead motors?:http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayI ... 0266091713

Or the titan: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/TITAN-25 ... 240%3A1318

I guess right now, I am stuck on which route to go. So I figured if you fellas don't care for either one of these motors I might as go the v8 route. I don't care to rebuild the stock motor into a stroker as I really am not to sure on engine building. I can do everything else (v8 swaps). Just not to sure on machining. Please share your thoughts! Thanks!

Brian
dwg86
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1245
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 6:20 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6
Vehicle Year: 2003
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by dwg86 »

From what I've heard, DO NOT buy a Titan. If I were going to buy a stroker, I would buy one from Hesco. They may be more expensive, but as the old saying goes "you get what you pay for". Hesco also comes with a warranty.
User avatar
PolloLoco
Donator
Donator
Posts: 212
Joined: March 8th, 2009, 6:39 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: TJ
Location: DeRidder, LA

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by PolloLoco »

Jeep Stroker by HAMMERHEAD wrote:OE Jeep 4.2 rods 6.125" Rods have beed mag tested, reconditioned
If he can't get his facts straight then I would say no.
Jeep Stroker by HAMMERHEAD wrote:Quench Height 0.041"
...
The head gasket is a Mopar performance.
Debatable it's advertised as 0.043" but someone on the board here measured an MLS to be 0.041".
4.7L Stroker, 4.88 Ford 8.8 w/Auburn ECTED, HP30 w/ARB, AX-15, NP231 w/RR SYE, 33x10.50 BFG A/T, 4" Skyjacker, 1" body lift, 1" MORE motor mounts, Kilby fuel tank skid, UCF ultra-high clearance 1/4" skid, HMMWV-style snorkel, 63mm TB
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by SilverXJ »

Both of these engines are made by Titan.. why two separate ads with different names, I don't know. Stay far away. Do a search on here and NAXJA for Titan.
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3241
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by Cheromaniac »

I wouldn't touch a Titan stroker with a 10-foot bargepole. Golen's is much better but is it worth the cost of buying and shipping? You're better off buying a good, used junkyard 4.0 and rebuilding that into a stroker. A V8 swap will cost a lot more than you think and a lot of fabrication is needed to make it work, so it's not for the faint-hearted or the light-walleted.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
User avatar
Plechtan
Donator
Donator
Posts: 667
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 9:00 am
Stroker Displacement: 5.0L 4x4
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Woodstock, IL
Contact:

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by Plechtan »

You don't state what year you have, but if the block is shot, you should be able to get a core motor for about $200.00 Get a 92 and up so you will have a HO head.

You should be able to find a local engine shop. Ask around at the local track for a good shop. Check out the recipies at the top of this section. If you keep it simple you should be able to get away for a couple of grand.
Peter Lechtanski
The worlds Fastest Comanche Prroject
ech0sh4y
Noob
Noob
Posts: 10
Joined: June 22nd, 2009, 6:44 pm
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by ech0sh4y »

I have an '04 with the distributor-less style. I was told the blocks are not interchangeable.
User avatar
Plechtan
Donator
Donator
Posts: 667
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 9:00 am
Stroker Displacement: 5.0L 4x4
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Woodstock, IL
Contact:

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by Plechtan »

You will need a 2000 and up block.
Peter Lechtanski
The worlds Fastest Comanche Prroject
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by SilverXJ »

Also, since you have a WJ or TJ you will need a block from a WJ or TJ. I don't know if you can interchange TJ and WJ blocks though.

On the V8 engine swap you will be spending a crap load of money, fabrication, and wiring. Not to mention your stock gauges will be 100% non functional as they will not work with out the stock computer, and you will most likely not pass inspection.
ech0sh4y
Noob
Noob
Posts: 10
Joined: June 22nd, 2009, 6:44 pm
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by ech0sh4y »

Alright, well you guys convinced me to build my own stroker. I was looking at the stroker website (posted under recipies) and I'm not sure what I should even think about building. I am going to daily driver this rig and wheel is a few times a year. I guess I am looking for a reliable setup that can be easy to build (find parts for). What recipe should I shoot for? I have an 04 wrangler Rubicon that I will be putting this is. I plan to eventually run 35's with the stock auto trans (42rle). Any opinions would be much appreciated!!
ech0sh4y
Noob
Noob
Posts: 10
Joined: June 22nd, 2009, 6:44 pm
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by ech0sh4y »

I was thinking of going with this setup thanks to the stroker web page what do you think:

4.6L Low-buck stroker

Jeep 4.2L 3.895" stroke crank
Jeep 4.2L 5.875" rods
Speed Pro H825CP +0.030" bore pistons
9.6:1 CR
Comp Cams #68-231-4 206/214 degree camshaft
Ported HO 1.91"/1.50" cylinder head
Mopar/Victor 0.043" head gasket
0.081" quench height
Ford 24lb/hr injectors with adjustable FPR or MAP adjuster for '87-'95 engines, Ford 24lb/hr injectors with stock 49psi FPR for '96 and later engines
264hp @ 4900rpm, 324lbft @ 3500rpm
User avatar
gradon
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1353
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: DC

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by gradon »

Looks good. I would get the block decked to get the quench down to .060" or less. Dunno where that'll put your dcr with that cam but if you're in the low 8s or lower, you'll be good.
ech0sh4y
Noob
Noob
Posts: 10
Joined: June 22nd, 2009, 6:44 pm
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by ech0sh4y »

What is the DCR for 89 octane roughly 9 or less?
User avatar
gradon
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1353
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: DC

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by gradon »

I don't know of a definitive dcr-octane relationship, but have read that 8.5:1 is the edge of pump gas(93 octane). Mine's lightly compression pinging at 8.57:1 with 93(when cold and doesn't change when warmed, so it's not because of heat). Others should post what the lowest octane they can get away with from their dcrs. It seems like 8:1 can get by on midgrade. Others with lower dcrs and higher quenches also have to use higher grades of gas. A good quench(.040"-.060") can prevent pinging, so if I was you, I'd shoot for the good quench and have the pistons dished if the cam is making the dcr too high(cams with less overlap build compression sooner and higher).
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Opinions on These Strokers?

Post by SilverXJ »

I have a 8.25 DCR and .048" quench. If I let it run rich I can run midgrade. Getting closer to 13:1 AFR I need premium.... these were brief findings, as I haven't been able to play with it that much.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 3 guests