So this whole poor man stroker thing......
-
- Movin on up ^
- Posts: 324
- Joined: December 5th, 2015, 5:26 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1981
- Vehicle Make: amc
- Vehicle Model: eaglesx4
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
Umm... yea you're a dick. Anyways thanks Cheromaniac for that reply. Now I understand better what octane fuels means with quench height. Since I have a complete 258 block I'm going with the rods and crank because I already have them and they are free lol. So this 80 +/- quench height thing now, If my quench height is lets say 80 nad I take ten off the block and ten off the head does that drop quench height to 60 ? I don't mind running 89 octane or so. Shit that's a 10 cent difference on a gallon big deal. Even if you drop a few hundred more to get a 43 quench and run 87 octane how many gallons of gas do you need to buy to make up the difference of cost and start coming ahead ? Answer is a fricking lot !!!
-
- Movin on up ^
- Posts: 324
- Joined: December 5th, 2015, 5:26 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1981
- Vehicle Make: amc
- Vehicle Model: eaglesx4
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
Sock 4.0 is around an 80 quench if I remember reading right. Hell I always run mine on 87 with no issues.
-
- My keyboard is getting warn out
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.9
- Location: Michigan
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
So your going with the painted VC's, cool.


- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
The stock 4.0 has an 8.8:1 CR and a 0.073" quench height.
The original poor man's stroker has a 9.25:1 CR and a 0.088" quench. Taking 0.010" off the block will reduce the quench to 0.078" (closer to stock) but it'll also raise the CR to 9.43:1. Smoothening and polishing the combustion chambers in the head will add a little volume, bring the CR down again slightly, and increase the engine's resistance to detonation so it's a detail that's definitely worth your attention. You could also do the same to the piston dishes.

The quench height is the clearance between the head surface and the flat portion of the piston crown when the piston is at TDC. Shaving the head won't change that but shaving the block deck definitely will.If my quench height is lets say 80 and I take ten off the block and ten off the head does that drop quench height to 60 ?
The original poor man's stroker has a 9.25:1 CR and a 0.088" quench. Taking 0.010" off the block will reduce the quench to 0.078" (closer to stock) but it'll also raise the CR to 9.43:1. Smoothening and polishing the combustion chambers in the head will add a little volume, bring the CR down again slightly, and increase the engine's resistance to detonation so it's a detail that's definitely worth your attention. You could also do the same to the piston dishes.
You're cracking me up!jsawduste wrote:So your going with the painted VC's, cool.

1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car

- IH 392
- I love JeepStrokers.com!!
- Posts: 725
- Joined: October 4th, 2008, 11:15 am
- Location: Eugene ORYGUN
- Contact:
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
Russ Pottenger wrote:He just has to decide he wants to shop at Walmart or Macy's
Maybe he's going to get the paint at Wally World?jsawduste wrote:So your going with the painted VC's, cool.

You can get more power out of ANY engine!!!
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
-
- Movin on up ^
- Posts: 324
- Joined: December 5th, 2015, 5:26 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1981
- Vehicle Make: amc
- Vehicle Model: eaglesx4
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
Man you just don't give up. I can paint a room right or left handed without tape or drop cloths. Can you ??? No so I won't start on you being an idiot then. Anyways.... Making more sense now with 10 off the block 10 is lower on quench. I'm learning more here. As of now my block is at the shop as well as my 720 rods and crank from the 81' 258 block. My 682324 is on its way here and things are moving along. Hopefully with ten off the head and a little more porting I should be less than 80 quench putting me close to 87 versus 89 octane but either way is fine. With the whole per ignition thing if I upgraded the ignition and a hotter spark plug maybe that will help pre ignition idk
-
- My keyboard is getting warn out
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.9
- Location: Michigan
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
Ok, you win.
Let us know how it all works out.
Let us know how it all works out.
- IH 392
- I love JeepStrokers.com!!
- Posts: 725
- Joined: October 4th, 2008, 11:15 am
- Location: Eugene ORYGUN
- Contact:
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
Yep, hotter spark plugs PROMOTE preignition, but tightening the quench will help eliminate Detonation.amceaglesx4 wrote:With the whole per ignition thing if I upgraded the ignition and a hotter spark plug maybe that will help pre ignition idk
You can get more power out of ANY engine!!!
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
-
- Movin on up ^
- Posts: 324
- Joined: December 5th, 2015, 5:26 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1981
- Vehicle Make: amc
- Vehicle Model: eaglesx4
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
Alright thanks
-
- Movin on up ^
- Posts: 324
- Joined: December 5th, 2015, 5:26 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1981
- Vehicle Make: amc
- Vehicle Model: eaglesx4
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
Hey jsawduste maybe is spring we will hold hands on a sunny day and skip through a junkyard . Lmao
-
- My keyboard is getting warn out
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.9
- Location: Michigan
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
Sure thing, dawg.
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
I've got a better idea.amceaglesx4 wrote:Hey jsawduste maybe is spring we will hold hands on a sunny day and skip through a junkyard . Lmao
We should meet up with Russ and have a Bishop Buehl beerfest.

1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car

-
- My keyboard is getting warn out
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.9
- Location: Michigan
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
That's a good thought Dino. However I'd hate to waste good beer.
-
- Movin on up ^
- Posts: 370
- Joined: December 5th, 2013, 1:55 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6
- Vehicle Year: 1998
- Vehicle Make: jeep
- Vehicle Model: xj
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
If the machine shop is going to deck the block 0.010", why not have them deck it 0.030 or 0.040" and get it right.
Either way, you will probably need new length push rods.
Either way, you will probably need new length push rods.
-
- Strong Poster
- Posts: 922
- Joined: August 15th, 2009, 1:27 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......
X2,IH 392 wrote:Yep, hotter spark plugs PROMOTE preignition, but tightening the quench will help eliminate Detonation.amceaglesx4 wrote:With the whole per ignition thing if I upgraded the ignition and a hotter spark plug maybe that will help pre ignition idk
Also wanted to add that decking your block does help your quench but surfacing your head does not.
It will decrease the chamber volume and increase your static compression ratio. That's assuming I read and understood your thread correctly.
Also keep in mind past a certain point the quench becomes less efficient.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests