So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
amceaglesx4
Movin on up ^
Movin on up ^
Posts: 324
Joined: December 5th, 2015, 5:26 pm
Vehicle Year: 1981
Vehicle Make: amc
Vehicle Model: eaglesx4

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by amceaglesx4 »

Umm... yea you're a dick. Anyways thanks Cheromaniac for that reply. Now I understand better what octane fuels means with quench height. Since I have a complete 258 block I'm going with the rods and crank because I already have them and they are free lol. So this 80 +/- quench height thing now, If my quench height is lets say 80 nad I take ten off the block and ten off the head does that drop quench height to 60 ? I don't mind running 89 octane or so. Shit that's a 10 cent difference on a gallon big deal. Even if you drop a few hundred more to get a 43 quench and run 87 octane how many gallons of gas do you need to buy to make up the difference of cost and start coming ahead ? Answer is a fricking lot !!!
amceaglesx4
Movin on up ^
Movin on up ^
Posts: 324
Joined: December 5th, 2015, 5:26 pm
Vehicle Year: 1981
Vehicle Make: amc
Vehicle Model: eaglesx4

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by amceaglesx4 »

Sock 4.0 is around an 80 quench if I remember reading right. Hell I always run mine on 87 with no issues.
jsawduste
My keyboard is getting warn out
My keyboard is getting warn out
Posts: 1032
Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.9
Location: Michigan

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by jsawduste »

So your going with the painted VC's, cool.
:deadhorse:
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3258
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by Cheromaniac »

The stock 4.0 has an 8.8:1 CR and a 0.073" quench height.
If my quench height is lets say 80 and I take ten off the block and ten off the head does that drop quench height to 60 ?
The quench height is the clearance between the head surface and the flat portion of the piston crown when the piston is at TDC. Shaving the head won't change that but shaving the block deck definitely will.
The original poor man's stroker has a 9.25:1 CR and a 0.088" quench. Taking 0.010" off the block will reduce the quench to 0.078" (closer to stock) but it'll also raise the CR to 9.43:1. Smoothening and polishing the combustion chambers in the head will add a little volume, bring the CR down again slightly, and increase the engine's resistance to detonation so it's a detail that's definitely worth your attention. You could also do the same to the piston dishes.
jsawduste wrote:So your going with the painted VC's, cool.
:deadhorse:
You're cracking me up! ;)
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
User avatar
IH 392
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 725
Joined: October 4th, 2008, 11:15 am
Location: Eugene ORYGUN
Contact:

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by IH 392 »

Russ Pottenger wrote:He just has to decide he wants to shop at Walmart or Macy's
jsawduste wrote:So your going with the painted VC's, cool.
Maybe he's going to get the paint at Wally World? :huh:
You can get more power out of ANY engine!!!
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
amceaglesx4
Movin on up ^
Movin on up ^
Posts: 324
Joined: December 5th, 2015, 5:26 pm
Vehicle Year: 1981
Vehicle Make: amc
Vehicle Model: eaglesx4

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by amceaglesx4 »

Man you just don't give up. I can paint a room right or left handed without tape or drop cloths. Can you ??? No so I won't start on you being an idiot then. Anyways.... Making more sense now with 10 off the block 10 is lower on quench. I'm learning more here. As of now my block is at the shop as well as my 720 rods and crank from the 81' 258 block. My 682324 is on its way here and things are moving along. Hopefully with ten off the head and a little more porting I should be less than 80 quench putting me close to 87 versus 89 octane but either way is fine. With the whole per ignition thing if I upgraded the ignition and a hotter spark plug maybe that will help pre ignition idk
jsawduste
My keyboard is getting warn out
My keyboard is getting warn out
Posts: 1032
Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.9
Location: Michigan

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by jsawduste »

Ok, you win.
Let us know how it all works out.
User avatar
IH 392
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 725
Joined: October 4th, 2008, 11:15 am
Location: Eugene ORYGUN
Contact:

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by IH 392 »

amceaglesx4 wrote:With the whole per ignition thing if I upgraded the ignition and a hotter spark plug maybe that will help pre ignition idk
Yep, hotter spark plugs PROMOTE preignition, but tightening the quench will help eliminate Detonation.
You can get more power out of ANY engine!!!
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
amceaglesx4
Movin on up ^
Movin on up ^
Posts: 324
Joined: December 5th, 2015, 5:26 pm
Vehicle Year: 1981
Vehicle Make: amc
Vehicle Model: eaglesx4

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by amceaglesx4 »

Alright thanks
amceaglesx4
Movin on up ^
Movin on up ^
Posts: 324
Joined: December 5th, 2015, 5:26 pm
Vehicle Year: 1981
Vehicle Make: amc
Vehicle Model: eaglesx4

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by amceaglesx4 »

Hey jsawduste maybe is spring we will hold hands on a sunny day and skip through a junkyard . Lmao
jsawduste
My keyboard is getting warn out
My keyboard is getting warn out
Posts: 1032
Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.9
Location: Michigan

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by jsawduste »

Sure thing, dawg.
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3258
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by Cheromaniac »

amceaglesx4 wrote:Hey jsawduste maybe is spring we will hold hands on a sunny day and skip through a junkyard . Lmao
I've got a better idea.
We should meet up with Russ and have a Bishop Buehl beerfest. :cheers:
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
jsawduste
My keyboard is getting warn out
My keyboard is getting warn out
Posts: 1032
Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.9
Location: Michigan

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by jsawduste »

That's a good thought Dino. However I'd hate to waste good beer.
jeepxj3
Movin on up ^
Movin on up ^
Posts: 370
Joined: December 5th, 2013, 1:55 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6
Vehicle Year: 1998
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: xj

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by jeepxj3 »

If the machine shop is going to deck the block 0.010", why not have them deck it 0.030 or 0.040" and get it right.
Either way, you will probably need new length push rods.
Russ Pottenger
Strong Poster
Strong Poster
Posts: 922
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 1:27 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: So this whole poor man stroker thing......

Post by Russ Pottenger »

IH 392 wrote:
amceaglesx4 wrote:With the whole per ignition thing if I upgraded the ignition and a hotter spark plug maybe that will help pre ignition idk
Yep, hotter spark plugs PROMOTE preignition, but tightening the quench will help eliminate Detonation.
X2,

Also wanted to add that decking your block does help your quench but surfacing your head does not.
It will decrease the chamber volume and increase your static compression ratio. That's assuming I read and understood your thread correctly.

Also keep in mind past a certain point the quench becomes less efficient.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest