New guy from MI Stroker Questions

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
Post Reply
User avatar
ajmorell
Donator
Donator
Posts: 81
Joined: March 16th, 2009, 11:49 am
Vehicle Year: 1998
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: ZJ
Location: Houghton, MI

New guy from MI Stroker Questions

Post by ajmorell »

Continued from:

viewtopic.php?p=8697#p8697

I'm working on putting together a mild stroker for it. I'm trying to keep the CR as close to stock as possible, certainly not much more than 9:1. Here is my thoughts/progress so far:

-Purchased 4.2 Crank & Rods (had to settle for 4CW crank, couldn't find 12CW)
-0.010" decking of block
-0.010" head planing
-Stock thickness head gasket

This should result in a CR of about 8.9:1 and quench of around 0.018 below stock. I'm not real familiar with the quench value, what is desireable and if 0.018" below stock is good, bad or otherwise. I could also use some recommendations for cams.
-Andy-
MichiganTech Mechanical Engineering
BSME '09
MSME '10
User avatar
ajmorell
Donator
Donator
Posts: 81
Joined: March 16th, 2009, 11:49 am
Vehicle Year: 1998
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: ZJ
Location: Houghton, MI

Re: New guy from MI Stroker Questions

Post by ajmorell »

Well, I'm pretty sure I didn't calculate something quite right. The combo I listed above will result in more like 9.5:1 from what I've figured. I'm a little unsure about aftermarket piston dish volumes for calculating so I presume there is some variation there. More than likely going to be using the standard Speed-Pro pistons
-Andy-
MichiganTech Mechanical Engineering
BSME '09
MSME '10
User avatar
PolloLoco
Donator
Donator
Posts: 212
Joined: March 8th, 2009, 6:39 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: TJ
Location: DeRidder, LA

Re: New guy from MI Stroker Questions

Post by PolloLoco »

Why don't you go with a Mopar performance gasket? It'll give you a lower quench value which will help reduce chance of ping.

Off subject:
I'm from Ann Arbor myself, graduated form University of Michigan on December 06, Mechanical Engineering. I did ROTC so now I'm deployed to Iraq.
4.7L Stroker, 4.88 Ford 8.8 w/Auburn ECTED, HP30 w/ARB, AX-15, NP231 w/RR SYE, 33x10.50 BFG A/T, 4" Skyjacker, 1" body lift, 1" MORE motor mounts, Kilby fuel tank skid, UCF ultra-high clearance 1/4" skid, HMMWV-style snorkel, 63mm TB
User avatar
ajmorell
Donator
Donator
Posts: 81
Joined: March 16th, 2009, 11:49 am
Vehicle Year: 1998
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: ZJ
Location: Houghton, MI

Re: New guy from MI Stroker Questions

Post by ajmorell »

I've decided to go an alternate route altogether. The combo I was looking at just couldn't get good quench numbers. Here is what I've settled on:

-258 4CW crank
-stock 4.0 connecting rods
-KB944 pistons (21.7 cc dish & 1.353 comp. height), no more than 0.030" over depending on what the shop says upon gaging the block
-0.020" decking of block
-Comp Cams X4250H-13 cam


This should result in good CR and quench numbers

CR: 9.35:1
Quench: 0.0605" (0.012" above stock)

This is going to cost me a bit more since the forged pistons are about $75 each but in the end I think it will be more reliable and run better with less worry of knock.
-Andy-
MichiganTech Mechanical Engineering
BSME '09
MSME '10
User avatar
PolloLoco
Donator
Donator
Posts: 212
Joined: March 8th, 2009, 6:39 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: TJ
Location: DeRidder, LA

Re: New guy from MI Stroker Questions

Post by PolloLoco »

So I'm trying to find a little more info on using the 4.0 connecting rods. They are longer so custom pistons are needed. I was already planning on boring 0.060" so I'd need new pistons anyway. Any benefit to either the 4.0 or 4.2 connecting rods when going 0.060" over?
4.7L Stroker, 4.88 Ford 8.8 w/Auburn ECTED, HP30 w/ARB, AX-15, NP231 w/RR SYE, 33x10.50 BFG A/T, 4" Skyjacker, 1" body lift, 1" MORE motor mounts, Kilby fuel tank skid, UCF ultra-high clearance 1/4" skid, HMMWV-style snorkel, 63mm TB
dwg86
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1245
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 6:20 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6
Vehicle Year: 2003
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: New guy from MI Stroker Questions

Post by dwg86 »

PolloLoco wrote:So I'm trying to find a little more info on using the 4.0 connecting rods. They are longer so custom pistons are needed. I was already planning on boring 0.060" so I'd need new pistons anyway. Any benefit to either the 4.0 or 4.2 connecting rods when going 0.060" over?

Keith Black makes a forged stroker piston using the 4.0 rod(kb944 and kb945), so you don't have to have a piston made. The 4.0 is a longer rod, so it would be better to use. A longer rod puts less piston side load on the cylinder and longer dwell at TDC.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 5 guests