importance of LSA?
-
- Noob
- Posts: 14
- Joined: February 8th, 2025, 11:54 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4,7
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Nissan
- Vehicle Model: Patrol 260
importance of LSA?
I often see that camshafts with LSA 113 or 114 are recommended for EFI engines.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of these compared to lower LSA?
Factory Jeep 4.0 engines used LSA 112 and even 107.5 camshafts, and they work fine with stock ECUs.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of these compared to lower LSA?
Factory Jeep 4.0 engines used LSA 112 and even 107.5 camshafts, and they work fine with stock ECUs.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: importance of LSA?
A wider LSA tends to produce a smaller valve overlap, more vacuum at idle, a smoother idle, and a flatter wider torque curve whereas a tighter LSA tends to produce more valve overlap, a lopier idle, and a peakier torque curve. Despite the tight LSA, the later OEM camshaft still has a smooth idle due to the shorter duration.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car

-
- Noob
- Posts: 14
- Joined: February 8th, 2025, 11:54 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4,7
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Nissan
- Vehicle Model: Patrol 260
Re: importance of LSA?
Thanks for your reply. I was wondering whether to buy a Comp Cams 68-231-4 with LSA 111 or a 68-301-5 with LSA 113. I don't see the .050 valve opening and closing specifications for the 301.Cheromaniac wrote: ↑May 1st, 2025, 1:56 pm A wider LSA tends to produce a smaller valve overlap, more vacuum at idle, a smoother idle, and a flatter wider torque curve whereas a tighter LSA tends to produce more valve overlap, a lopier idle, and a peakier torque curve. Despite the tight LSA, the later OEM camshaft still has a smooth idle due to the shorter duration.
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: importance of LSA?
Both are good all-round cams but the 68-301-5 is designed for the '99 and later blocks where the cam is held in place by a thrust plate rather than the older spring/pin set up. That cam has a 113* LSA and is installed at a 109* ICA.
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: importance of LSA?
Here are the seat to seat valve timing events for the 68-301-5 camshaft:
Intake Centerline: 109.00° ATDC
Exhaust Centerline: 117.00° BTDC
Intake Open: 16.00° BTDC
Intake Close: 54.00° ABDC
Exhaust Open: 66.00° BBDC
Exhaust Close: 12.00° ATDC
Overlap: 28.00°
and the 0.050" lift valve timing events:
Intake Centerline: 109.00° ATDC
Exhaust Centerline: 117.00° BTDC
Intake Open: -6.50° BTDC
Intake Close: 31.50° ABDC
Exhaust Open: 43.50° BBDC
Exhaust Close: -10.50° ATDC
Overlap: -17.00°
Intake Centerline: 109.00° ATDC
Exhaust Centerline: 117.00° BTDC
Intake Open: 16.00° BTDC
Intake Close: 54.00° ABDC
Exhaust Open: 66.00° BBDC
Exhaust Close: 12.00° ATDC
Overlap: 28.00°
and the 0.050" lift valve timing events:
Intake Centerline: 109.00° ATDC
Exhaust Centerline: 117.00° BTDC
Intake Open: -6.50° BTDC
Intake Close: 31.50° ABDC
Exhaust Open: 43.50° BBDC
Exhaust Close: -10.50° ATDC
Overlap: -17.00°
-
- Noob
- Posts: 14
- Joined: February 8th, 2025, 11:54 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4,7
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Nissan
- Vehicle Model: Patrol 260
Re: importance of LSA?
Are you sure of what you're saying? Aren't you confusing it with the 163-301-5 cam?Cheromaniac wrote: ↑May 3rd, 2025, 12:31 am Both are good all-round cams but the 68-301-5 is designed for the '99 and later blocks where the cam is held in place by a thrust plate rather than the older spring/pin set up. That cam has a 113* LSA and is installed at a 109* ICA.
My preference leans slightly more toward the 68-301-5 because it has LSA113 and, according to the Comp Cams website, it's nitride-coated. It also specifies that it's for pre-1998 engines.
Here's the link.
https://www.compcams.com/xtreme-4x4-205 ... 8-cpg.html
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
-
- Noob
- Posts: 14
- Joined: February 8th, 2025, 11:54 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4,7
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Nissan
- Vehicle Model: Patrol 260
Re: importance of LSA?
The decision is made then. I'm going to buy the 68-301-5.
Thanks for the information, you've helped me a lot.
Thanks for the information, you've helped me a lot.
-
- Noob
- Posts: 14
- Joined: February 8th, 2025, 11:54 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4,7
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Nissan
- Vehicle Model: Patrol 260
Re: importance of LSA?
I'd like to take this opportunity to point out a possible error.Cheromaniac wrote: ↑May 3rd, 2025, 5:34 am Here's my updated spreadsheet:
https://www.angelfire.com/my/fan/Jeep4.0Camshafts.htm
When I enter the data into the calculator to find the DCR, if I select the 1999/2004 OEM camshaft (mine is 97' but I understand it has the same degrees and advance), the calculator shows an intake closure angle of 53.95 degrees, resulting in 8.24 DCR. If I do the calculation using the degrees of closure indicated in the camshaft list, i.e. 60.9 degrees, it calculates 7.88 DCR. What would be the correct result?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: importance of LSA?
The second picture is correct. In the first picture you entered an advance or retard of 0 degrees when you should have actually entered -2.5 degrees.
-
- Noob
- Posts: 14
- Joined: February 8th, 2025, 11:54 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4,7
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Nissan
- Vehicle Model: Patrol 260
Re: importance of LSA?
To get the same result as the second image, I have to put -7 degrees in the advance or delay box.
-
- Noob
- Posts: 14
- Joined: February 8th, 2025, 11:54 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4,7
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Nissan
- Vehicle Model: Patrol 260
Re: importance of LSA?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: importance of LSA?
Yeah I get the same result when I enter the seat to seat valve timing events: 107.3* LSA and 114.3* ICA or 7 degrees of retard. When I enter the 0.050" lift events I get 107.5 & 110 respectively or 2.5 degrees of retard. I'm not sure which I should believe.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 3 guests