Hey all,
I've browsed through the chats but am still not clear if my situation is correct. I'm running a 3727 crank in an '01 block with what I assumed were stock 4.0L rods. Is this normal to be around 1/4" off piston to deck height at TDC?
Piston to deck height
-
SNUBBERMIKE
- Posts: 1
- Joined: December 20th, 2020, 10:38 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7
- Vehicle Year: 2001
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: TJ Sport
-
mpgMike
- I think I'll order a "tab"
- Posts: 48
- Joined: October 14th, 2022, 3:34 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6
- Vehicle Year: 1995
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: ZJ
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: Piston to deck height
Absolutely not! You shouldn't be more than -0.035" or so at the most. Looks like you either got pistons spec'd for the wrong rods, or the wrong rods for the pistons. What a shame!
-
Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: Piston to deck height
It sounds like you have the 1/4" shorter 4.2L connecting rods by mistake.SNUBBERMIKE wrote: ↑October 13th, 2022, 8:46 pm Hey all,
I've browsed through the chats but am still not clear if my situation is correct. I'm running a 3727 crank in an '01 block with what I assumed were stock 4.0L rods. Is this normal to be around 1/4" off piston to deck height at TDC?
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests