Hey guys, although I'm new to the forum, I've been lurking the site for months.
I'm a xj Cherokee owner in South Africa and I recently fitted 31s to my jeep. The increase in tire size has had a huge effect on the auto transmission, so much so that I'm considering an expensive ratio swop. However, before I do that, I was wondering what everyone's thoughts are on a ratio change versus the stroker route.
In other words, will the stroker conversion solve my inadequate 3.55 ratio problem, or will I still have to perform the ratio change even with a stroker motor? I can't afford to do both mods, so I'd like to pick the most effective. Personally, I'd rather spend the bucks on more torque than diff gears.
Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Stroker vs ratio change
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: June 23rd, 2013, 11:38 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.0
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
-
- Making Progress
- Posts: 85
- Joined: August 23rd, 2012, 3:33 am
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Re: Stroker vs ratio change
I am in the same situation, but I was going to build a stroker anyway. It will be interesting to here some opinions. I am not going to do a gear change until I see how the extra torque helps the situation out.
- IH 392
- I love JeepStrokers.com!!
- Posts: 725
- Joined: October 4th, 2008, 11:15 am
- Location: Eugene ORYGUN
- Contact:
Re: Stroker vs ratio change
My Wrangler has 31's on it with the 4.0, it had 3.55's, I swapped in 3.73's and the only reason I'm not dissatisfied with the gear swap is my mileage stayed exactly the same. 

You can get more power out of ANY engine!!!
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
- cruiser54
- Donator
- Posts: 204
- Joined: November 3rd, 2009, 4:38 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Comanche
- Contact:
Re: Stroker vs ratio change
My 88 XJ with a 4.0 and 31s works great. Runs as strong as my 90 MJ with stock sized tires here at 5,000 foot elevation.
Cruiser's Mostly Renix Tips can be found here :
www.cruiser54.com
Wanna view my technical photos? WARNING: Renix heavy!!
http://www.cherokeeforum.com/g/album/1725214
www.cruiser54.com
Wanna view my technical photos? WARNING: Renix heavy!!
http://www.cherokeeforum.com/g/album/1725214
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: Stroker vs ratio change
Going from 3.55 to 4.10 axle gears will increase torque multiplication at the wheels by ~15%.
Going from a stock 4.0L displacement to a 4.6L stroker displacement will also increase average torque by ~15% (bigger increase at lower rpm, smaller increase at higher rpm). If your existing engine's tired, a stroker rebuild would make more sense than swapping axle gears.
Going from a stock 4.0L displacement to a 4.6L stroker displacement will also increase average torque by ~15% (bigger increase at lower rpm, smaller increase at higher rpm). If your existing engine's tired, a stroker rebuild would make more sense than swapping axle gears.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car

-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: June 23rd, 2013, 11:38 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.0
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Re: Stroker vs ratio change
Thanks cheromaniac. Those are interesting figures. That's pretty much what I was thinking. The great thing about a stroker motor conversion is that you get a brand new motor with the stroker. It seems like better value for money that a ratio change.
-
- I love this board
- Posts: 413
- Joined: March 30th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1988
- Vehicle Make: jeep
- Vehicle Model: cherokee
- Location: portland, tx
Re: Stroker vs ratio change
well my stroker seems to like the 4.10's and 35's. i was thinking about doing 4.56's but there's no need
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: Stroker vs ratio change
Yup, that makes sense, and the OP's 3.55s and 31s should work well with a stroker.shawnxj wrote:well my stroker seems to like the 4.10's and 35's. i was thinking about doing 4.56's but there's no need
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 7 guests