Tight Quench can help with cooling as well as the Air/Fuel Mixture to promote an even burn. If you have an uneven burn you could potentially create a hotspot in the combustion chamber which could result in Detonation. The cooling effect also helps keep these potential hotspots from detonating.
Our Compression Ratio FAQ is also worth a read and covers the above:
http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... ?f=34&t=73
New build from central Maine
- Muad'Dib
- Site Admin / Owner
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: January 8th, 2008, 10:55 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
Re: New build from central Maine
If it feels right, then STROKE it!
-
- Making Progress
- Posts: 60
- Joined: January 15th, 2012, 7:04 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: ZJ
- Location: Butte Montana
Re: New build from central Maine
All being equal and unlimited money it makes sense to insure your quench height is around 0.040" then build your engine around this dimension. Here's a link that will shed some light on the topic but as you would expect does not give a defined answer. Unfortunately I've only found directional data and information but no magic formula. Some examples that work are
Stock 4.0 liter SCR 8.8, DCR 7.47, Quench 0.073" - No ping
4.7 liter stroker SCR 9.9, DCR 8.5, Quench 0.043", Elevation 5500 ft - No ping
DCR 8.5, Quench ~0.043", under load climbing elevation >500ft - slight ping (example from Muad'Dib)
http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... ?f=27&t=73
Careful, you are standing on the edge of the Jeep Stroker Vortex, one step closer and your inexpensive build just got expensive.
Stock 4.0 liter SCR 8.8, DCR 7.47, Quench 0.073" - No ping
4.7 liter stroker SCR 9.9, DCR 8.5, Quench 0.043", Elevation 5500 ft - No ping
DCR 8.5, Quench ~0.043", under load climbing elevation >500ft - slight ping (example from Muad'Dib)
http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... ?f=27&t=73
Careful, you are standing on the edge of the Jeep Stroker Vortex, one step closer and your inexpensive build just got expensive.
JeepFamily (Rob)
1997 ZJ 4.7 Stroker
2000 WJ Limited (Totaled)
2002 WJ Limited 4.7HO (Sold)
2003 WJ Overland 4.7HO
2005 WK Limited (sold)
1997 ZJ Orvis 5.2 Up Country(48K miles)
1997 ZJ Laredo (parting out)
1998 ZJ Limited 5.9
Wrangler Want-ta-get-one
1997 ZJ 4.7 Stroker
2000 WJ Limited (Totaled)
2002 WJ Limited 4.7HO (Sold)
2003 WJ Overland 4.7HO
2005 WK Limited (sold)
1997 ZJ Orvis 5.2 Up Country(48K miles)
1997 ZJ Laredo (parting out)
1998 ZJ Limited 5.9
Wrangler Want-ta-get-one
-
- Donator
- Posts: 18
- Joined: October 16th, 2010, 5:59 am
- Vehicle Year: 1988
- Vehicle Make: jeep
- Vehicle Model: YJ
Re: New build from central Maine
Ok, I see the importance of both. I'm going to wait till i talk to the machinest thats doing the work for me to decide what to do. I still don't know if he has to shave the head or block. I realize that i'm on the edge of getting a good running engine and may have to do something to relieve some of the compression to get it. Even tho i'm limited on money there's no sence putting it together if it's not going to run right.
-
- Making Progress
- Posts: 60
- Joined: January 15th, 2012, 7:04 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: ZJ
- Location: Butte Montana
Re: New build from central Maine
Good, let me know where you end up going and ultimately, how your engine performs!
JeepFamily (Rob)
1997 ZJ 4.7 Stroker
2000 WJ Limited (Totaled)
2002 WJ Limited 4.7HO (Sold)
2003 WJ Overland 4.7HO
2005 WK Limited (sold)
1997 ZJ Orvis 5.2 Up Country(48K miles)
1997 ZJ Laredo (parting out)
1998 ZJ Limited 5.9
Wrangler Want-ta-get-one
1997 ZJ 4.7 Stroker
2000 WJ Limited (Totaled)
2002 WJ Limited 4.7HO (Sold)
2003 WJ Overland 4.7HO
2005 WK Limited (sold)
1997 ZJ Orvis 5.2 Up Country(48K miles)
1997 ZJ Laredo (parting out)
1998 ZJ Limited 5.9
Wrangler Want-ta-get-one
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 1 guest