Why not use Mopar valves?

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
Post Reply
User avatar
jeep7081
Learning to use the board
Learning to use the board
Posts: 34
Joined: January 29th, 2010, 10:15 pm
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ

Why not use Mopar valves?

Post by jeep7081 »

Stock jeep 4.0 valves are, 1.91" dia, valve length 4.912", Stem dia .312", single grooved (not confirmed)

Why not use Mopar valves from magnum? Too long?

Valve Head Diameter (in):1.970 in.
Valve Head Diameter (mm):50.038mm
Undercut Stem:No
Swirl-Polished:Yes
Overall Valve Length (in):4.910 in.
Overall Valve Length (mm):124.714mm
Valve Stem Diameter (in):0.315 in.
Valve Stem Diameter (mm):8.001mm
Valve Material:Stainless steel
Lock Groove Quantity:1-groove
Lock Groove Style:Conventional
Quantity:Sold individually.
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3254
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: Why not use Mopar valves?

Post by Cheromaniac »

The Mopar valves CAN be used but there are two main reasons why they're not. Firstly, there's little to gain from using oversize valves in the Jeep 4.0 head. Secondly, LS1 valves and valve springs are much cheaper and have become a more popular choice.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
User avatar
jeep7081
Learning to use the board
Learning to use the board
Posts: 34
Joined: January 29th, 2010, 10:15 pm
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ

Re: Why not use Mopar valves?

Post by jeep7081 »

Not worth doing the bigger valves then huh? Why everyone doing it then? Sheep?
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3254
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: Why not use Mopar valves?

Post by Cheromaniac »

jeep7081 wrote:Not worth doing the bigger valves then huh? Why everyone doing it then? Sheep?
Bah! :lol:
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
User avatar
jeep7081
Learning to use the board
Learning to use the board
Posts: 34
Joined: January 29th, 2010, 10:15 pm
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ

Re: Why not use Mopar valves?

Post by jeep7081 »

Anyone else with an input? I was hoping this forum wasn't all show and no tell (help).

Thanks
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Why not use Mopar valves?

Post by SilverXJ »

What else do you want? Mopar valves are over priced to begin with. If you are talking some other valve like from SI valves, then it wouldn't be a bad idea. Just don't get crazy with an over sized head as larger valves don't help flow due to cylinder and combustion chamber valve shrouding. I am using SI stainless and swirl polished on my intake valves, but only a tiny bit larger than stock.
User avatar
jeep7081
Learning to use the board
Learning to use the board
Posts: 34
Joined: January 29th, 2010, 10:15 pm
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ

Re: Why not use Mopar valves?

Post by jeep7081 »

Not sure how to read that.

Anyway, sounds like larger valves only come into play above 4000 rpm's from my reading. I didn't buy the jeep to race. So, might pass.
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Why not use Mopar valves?

Post by SilverXJ »

There isn't that much to read.

4000 or not, there is no benefit to larger valves in the Jeep engine due to cylinder and combustion chamber shrouding. Hesco doesn't even sell larger valves in its aluminum head.

I went with the SI SEV-3954 swirl polished stainless intake Magnum valves. Those valves are 1.92" vs the 1.915" stock size. Not much to even sneeze about. I went with them because they are stainless and swirl polishes. I also added a 30* back cut.
User avatar
jeep7081
Learning to use the board
Learning to use the board
Posts: 34
Joined: January 29th, 2010, 10:15 pm
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ

Re: Why not use Mopar valves?

Post by jeep7081 »

Internet posts are hard to read tone.

Fair enough. Sounds like Ill stick with cam and some roller rockers.
I6FAN
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 172
Joined: March 28th, 2010, 9:31 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.2
Vehicle Year: 1987
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: wrangler

Re: Why not use Mopar valves?

Post by I6FAN »

SilverXJ wrote:larger valves don't help flow due to cylinder and combustion chamber valve shrouding
x2...I think I saw a post on HESCO's site that said those were the absolute largest valves to use (with little gained), and going up in size, beyond those, gave diminishing returns unless you offset the valves in towards the cylinder's center which unshrouds them. For the rpm operating range of a jeep engine, the stock valves are about optimum. Some have gotten real good flow numbers with larger valves, but it's not only about quantity of flow, but quality as well; i.e. cleaned up ports and good valve job.
User avatar
jeep7081
Learning to use the board
Learning to use the board
Posts: 34
Joined: January 29th, 2010, 10:15 pm
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ

Re: Why not use Mopar valves?

Post by jeep7081 »

Since i have a cam "231" stick with roller rockers 1.6 correct?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Yella-Terra-Rol ... d3&vxp=mtr
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests