I have been boring out the '91 and up 4.0 throttle bodies by removing the reduction below the throttle plate.
I am wondering if the Renix TB has the same reduction, or is the throttle bore the same diameter for the entire length of the bore?
Thanks!--Peter
Renix Throttle Bodies
- Jeep-Power
- Donator
- Posts: 182
- Joined: February 13th, 2008, 7:32 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.3
- Vehicle Year: 1984
- Vehicle Make: AMC/Jeep
- Vehicle Model: CJ-7
- Location: Fort Mill, SC
Renix Throttle Bodies
-- TallPeter
'84 CJ-7 - tonned & turbo'd
'84 CJ-7 - tonned & turbo'd
- Muad'Dib
- Site Admin / Owner
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: January 8th, 2008, 10:55 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
Re: Renix Throttle Bodies
Its the same diameter the entire length of the bore. So a new butterfly valve is also needed when boring a RENIX TB.Jeep-Power wrote:I have been boring out the '91 and up 4.0 throttle bodies by removing the reduction below the throttle plate.
I am wondering if the Renix TB has the same reduction, or is the throttle bore the same diameter for the entire length of the bore?
Thanks!--Peter
If it feels right, then STROKE it!
- Jeep-Power
- Donator
- Posts: 182
- Joined: February 13th, 2008, 7:32 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.3
- Vehicle Year: 1984
- Vehicle Make: AMC/Jeep
- Vehicle Model: CJ-7
- Location: Fort Mill, SC
Re: Renix Throttle Bodies
Thanks for the confirmation.
How extra oomph is had from a larger Renix TB bore? I know it makes a difference opening the 91-06 TB's up to 60mm straight through...
How extra oomph is had from a larger Renix TB bore? I know it makes a difference opening the 91-06 TB's up to 60mm straight through...
-- TallPeter
'84 CJ-7 - tonned & turbo'd
'84 CJ-7 - tonned & turbo'd
-
- Donator
- Posts: 319
- Joined: February 13th, 2008, 7:31 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.5 needs assembly
- Location: Fredercksburg VA (land of nothing)
Re: Renix Throttle Bodies
Oletshot punched out my renix TB (61mm, i think), and the wife dyno asked if I "tuned up" the Heep.
She's about as non car savvy as you can get.
I did notice a very noticeable change in tip in and it picked up .5-1 MPG over 4 tanks (probably due to not having to floor it and waste a bunch fuel on a downshift)
She's about as non car savvy as you can get.
I did notice a very noticeable change in tip in and it picked up .5-1 MPG over 4 tanks (probably due to not having to floor it and waste a bunch fuel on a downshift)
TurboTom wrote:i will eat my words later if need be.
Proud owner of many stroker parts, that have not yet spontaneously assembled themselves.TurboTom wrote: Not sure of your rules...but you need to start with an engine that works best for the rules and cheat from there!
- Muad'Dib
- Site Admin / Owner
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: January 8th, 2008, 10:55 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
- Vehicle Year: 1990
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
Re: Renix Throttle Bodies
Its fairly significant as far as throttle response is concerned. I had to install a spacer to help even it out... it just was way to sensitive.Jeep-Power wrote:Thanks for the confirmation.
How extra oomph is had from a larger Renix TB bore? I know it makes a difference opening the 91-06 TB's up to 60mm straight through...
No numbers, just ass dyno.
If it feels right, then STROKE it!
- oletshot
- Donator
- Posts: 221
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 11:47 am
- Location: Chicagoland
Re: Renix Throttle Bodies
I did both yuppiexj's and Muad'Dib's to 61mm. I don't know how much actual HP is gained, but as both have said throttle response is outstanding (maybe to good, if there is such a thing). I have found that some of the Renix casting's don't like being opened up to 61mm.
I'm not clever enough to have a clever signature. I'll just steal yours.
'98 XJ 2-door, '94 YJ.
'98 XJ 2-door, '94 YJ.
-
- I made it to triple digits!
- Posts: 163
- Joined: February 19th, 2008, 9:16 pm
- Location: Hammerspace
- Contact:
Re: Renix Throttle Bodies
It's unlikely that you've actually gotten a performance gain from the bored TB, other than by BD ("Butt Dyno") readings. Since the OEM throttle bodies are even able to support strokers, it's not strictly necessary.
What a bored throttle body (and larger throttle valve) /does/ do for you is exaggerate the rate at which the throttle opens, giving you a more crisp part-throttle response. /That/ is what you're feeling.
If part-throttle response is important to you, then that's the way to go. You're not going to really change WOT response or raw power figures, since the main choke point is in the cylinder head (and not in the throttle valve.)
What a bored throttle body (and larger throttle valve) /does/ do for you is exaggerate the rate at which the throttle opens, giving you a more crisp part-throttle response. /That/ is what you're feeling.
If part-throttle response is important to you, then that's the way to go. You're not going to really change WOT response or raw power figures, since the main choke point is in the cylinder head (and not in the throttle valve.)
Kelley's Works in Progress - http://www.kelleyswip.com
KWiP Parts Exchange - http://www.kelleyswip.com/exchange.html
"I don't think any of us will ever forget Louie. Ever since the explosion, there's been a little piece of him on all of us..."
KWiP Parts Exchange - http://www.kelleyswip.com/exchange.html
"I don't think any of us will ever forget Louie. Ever since the explosion, there's been a little piece of him on all of us..."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest