Cam failure, partial rebuild. What intake / exhaust gasket?

For all non stroker / performance related problems and discussion.
Post Reply

Victor Reinz MLS or Felpro fiber laminated?

Victor Reinz MLS (MS16120)
3
75%
Felpro fiber laminated (MS94970)
1
25%
 
Total votes: 4

Brandon_K
I think I'll order a "tab"
I think I'll order a "tab"
Posts: 40
Joined: February 24th, 2009, 3:18 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1999
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Cam failure, partial rebuild. What intake / exhaust gasket?

Post by Brandon_K »

So, I built my 4.6L stroker back in July of 09 after I grenaded a piston in February. It ran ok for ~2.5 years. I wasn't particularly impressed with it, but it was built and what was done was done. It ran ok, but this past summer my fuel economy had gone down big time and I thought I felt a loss in power. There were times I could barely hit 80 on the interstate. I just chalked it up to big tires, big lift, etc. It's not exactly a sports car. Fast forward to November of this past year. The engine went from "normal" to shuddering and shaking. I drove it home 2 miles, HUGE power loss. I did some basic troubleshooting, it was certainly dropping a cylinder or two. It spit out a few codes, injector control failure on #4, injector control failure on #5 and misfire on #5. So I did some more trouble shooting, convinced it had to be an injector or PCM issue. I even ripped the fuel rail off, all 6 injectors squirted happily away. It sat until last week (I have a second car and besides, wheeling season was about done for me). I miss the Jeep, so I started tearing into it again. For shits and grins, did a cap, rotor, plugs and wires. Ran smoother (maybe attributed to running one range cooler and going from Champions to Autolites), but still was certainly pounding away and still dropping a cylinder. Then moved on with a compression check. Holes 1,2 3, 4 and 6 came up with ~200 psi. Bore 5 left me with 120 and her plug was wet. Certainly not right. Pulled the valve cover, nothing looked mangled. Pulled the coil wire, had a buddy bump it over while I watched the valvetrain. Yup, found the problem, #5 intake rocker and valve weren't moving, at all. Blah.

Pulled the accessories, front grill, etc. Pulled the head, pulled the lifters out. #5 intake lifter was destroyed. A hole basically clean through it and the cam side was actually ground at a pretty good angle. The other 11 looked beautiful. Pulled the cam out. No scoring on any of the journals, #5 lobe was trashed, all 11 other lobes were perfect.

So, with that said and all of the other research I've done, I've really lost a lot of trust in my motor. Maybe my build was off, maybe it was just a bad $5 lifter, but regardless, I'm not going to dump a ton of money back into it. My header (cheap, "accordion" style) is cracked, again. I was going to put a Borla on it, but going back to not trusting the motor.. That $480 Borla header basically buys me a 5.3L GM LM7 dropout.

I already have a 68-231-4 CompCam that I'm going to throw in it (it was from the original build, I neglected to realize at the time that I needed the old 4.2L timing kit to run the cam, so I slid the OEM bumpstick back in to get it back together. It was the middle of wheeling season after all! For the record for anyone that may search and come across this thread; the valves were stock, Mopar Performance springs, retainers and locks were used. Originally I suspected that the OEM cam may not have liked the higher spring pressure from the MP springs, but I would have expected to see some kind of wear on the other lobes of the cam, which I didn't, so I believe it was a bad lifter that wiped the cam out, not the other way around).

With my massive tangent out of the way, on to the real question;

When I originally built the motor, I ordered a full Victor Reinz gasket kit for it. Every gasket was correct, except for the intake \ exhaust gasket. Apparently, my 99 block / head is a bit of a Chrysler bastard child. The gasket that it came with fits the intake ports mostly properly, but the exhaust is way off. The holes are square or "D" shaped and actually blocks off a solid 3/8 of the bottom of the exhaust port on the head. I ran into this problem once before when I installed an aftermarket header. It came with one of those ultra cheap pressed gaskets, I didn't like it, ran up to the parts store and got a Felpro gasket for a 99 Wrangler. The one I bought didn't fit right and of course the parts store was closed. So I used the cheap one that actually fit properly.

On this build, same deal. The VR gasket (stamped 17941S) covers up the exhaust ports. I ended up with a Felpro MS94970. It has round exhaust holes that don't restrict the exhaust ports. According to Rock Auto, that gasket is used on 91-98 4.0L motors. Doing a little detective work, I pulled up the P\N for a 1998 Victor Reinz exhaust manifold; MS16120. A Google image search shows the MS16120 looks just like the Felpro MS94970. The P\N reported for a 1999 Victor Reinz gasket is MS16315, Google shows that as being the "square" holed gasket that my kit came with.

The Victor gasket is a MLS gasket, with the intake portion being a single layer of steel. The exhaust portion of the gasket is made up of two layers of steel. Each section is cut to fit around the other and riveted to each other. Each of the intake and exhaust ports are "beaded", IE they have a ridge that runs around them. The Felpro gasket is a steel core with some sort of fiber laminate on each side. I have always had bad luck with exhaust leaks, both at the header as well as at the gasket on my 6cyl Jeeps. Even after following careful FSM torque procedures, they still leak. My question is, what gasket type do you prefer for intake and exhaust? The multi layer steel Victor gasket, or the fiber laminated Felpro? I'm ordering a full gasket kit, again for my rebuild and I have to order the intake /exhaust gasket separately, so I can go either way. Opinions?

Pictures make everything better, right?

Felpro MS94970 (91-98 4.0L, also 99 in my case)
Image

Victor Reinz MS16120 (91-98 4.0L, again also 99 in my case)
Image

Victor Reinz MS16315 (99-06 4.0L, does not fit my 99. You can see how much higher the exhaust ports sit vs that of 91-98 gasket ports)
Image


(Sorry for all of the extra info for such a simple question, but I thought it might come in handy for someone searching in the future)
User avatar
jeepman
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 76
Joined: April 26th, 2010, 8:23 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7
Vehicle Year: 1989
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: MJ
Location: Hamilton ON CANADA

Re: Cam failure, partial rebuild. What intake / exhaust gas

Post by jeepman »

I have ran into this alot and MOPAR screwed up for some reason or another with the 99's and used the wrong (00+ intake/exhaust) gasket when they should have used the Proper 91-98 gasket...

I would say go with the Felpro Gasket as that is what I use most and find it to be better or get a custom MLS Gasket made which is what I will be doing for my Storker...
User avatar
IH 392
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 725
Joined: October 4th, 2008, 11:15 am
Location: Eugene ORYGUN
Contact:

Re: Cam failure, partial rebuild. What intake / exhaust gas

Post by IH 392 »

Use the correct VICTOR gasket, I throw the cardboard Felpro's in the trash!
You can get more power out of ANY engine!!!
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Cam failure, partial rebuild. What intake / exhaust gas

Post by SilverXJ »

I always used the Felpro and never had an issue with it. I'd do with that as there is a bit more meat to it than just simple steel. Plus it has large rings on the exhaust ports. Its definitely not cardboard.
Brandon_K wrote:For the record for anyone that may search and come across this thread; the valves were stock, Mopar Performance springs, retainers and locks were used. Originally I suspected that the OEM cam may not have liked the higher spring pressure from the MP springs, but I would have expected to see some kind of wear on the other lobes of the cam, which I didn't, so I believe it was a bad lifter that wiped the cam out, not the other way around).
I don't think you did that right. IIRC the 99 valve has the 3 bead groove stems. The Mopar performance locks are a single bead groove. They aren't compatible.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests