4.0 crank bolt threads
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: July 14th, 2011, 12:44 pm
- Vehicle Year: 2006
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Wrangler
4.0 crank bolt threads
Ok, so I searched around and I found that 4.0 cranks have 1/2-20 threads. With all the changes the 4.0 engine saw over the las 7 year of it production, I wanted to confirm that they did not change the threads on it along the way?
-
- I made it to triple digits!
- Posts: 163
- Joined: February 19th, 2008, 9:16 pm
- Location: Hammerspace
- Contact:
Re: 4.0 crank bolt threads
I'm reasonably sure they did not - that would have required a change to tooling. The head & main cap screws are probably still 1/2"-13, the manifold screws are probably still 3/8"-16, and the like as well.
For instance, the Small Block Chevvy didn't really "go metric" until, I believe, the fourth-gen SB350 came out - since they made other changes to the engine design as well, it was a good time to change tooling over while they were about it.
ChryCo was building a legacy AMC design, and Dr. Z had probably been planning to EOL it for some time before the end of MY2006. So, I doubt the tooling would have been changed (part of this reasoning for EOL-ing the 6-242 was that it would have cost more to renew the tooling than to refit to produce another engine. As well as complaining about meeting emissions standards, and crash safety standards, and all that rot.
(If the inline six is so bad for crash safety and for emissions, why has BMW been using the thing for the last fifty or sixty years, and why did GM bring it back in Vortec trim - coincidentally, with a 242ci displacement?)
For instance, the Small Block Chevvy didn't really "go metric" until, I believe, the fourth-gen SB350 came out - since they made other changes to the engine design as well, it was a good time to change tooling over while they were about it.
ChryCo was building a legacy AMC design, and Dr. Z had probably been planning to EOL it for some time before the end of MY2006. So, I doubt the tooling would have been changed (part of this reasoning for EOL-ing the 6-242 was that it would have cost more to renew the tooling than to refit to produce another engine. As well as complaining about meeting emissions standards, and crash safety standards, and all that rot.
(If the inline six is so bad for crash safety and for emissions, why has BMW been using the thing for the last fifty or sixty years, and why did GM bring it back in Vortec trim - coincidentally, with a 242ci displacement?)
Kelley's Works in Progress - http://www.kelleyswip.com
KWiP Parts Exchange - http://www.kelleyswip.com/exchange.html
"I don't think any of us will ever forget Louie. Ever since the explosion, there's been a little piece of him on all of us..."
KWiP Parts Exchange - http://www.kelleyswip.com/exchange.html
"I don't think any of us will ever forget Louie. Ever since the explosion, there's been a little piece of him on all of us..."
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: July 14th, 2011, 12:44 pm
- Vehicle Year: 2006
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Wrangler
Re: 4.0 crank bolt threads
Ok well I confirmed it last night the crank/harmonic bal. bolt is 1/2-20.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests