99 intake

For all non stroker / performance related problems and discussion.
92tank
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 188
Joined: August 21st, 2010, 6:32 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.5
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

99 intake

Post by 92tank »

ok so now that i have a 2000 intake i have some questions.

1. what throttle body/sensors do i use?
2. its going on a 92 cherokee, what power steering pump and ther stuff i use?
3. anything else you can think of would be appreiciated

BTW: i have the 2000 sitting here so the parts are avail. thanks to my brother who totaled it yesterday :doh:
and i plan on using the 92 fuel rail
BADASYJ
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 164
Joined: December 7th, 2008, 10:21 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7

Re: 99 intake

Post by BADASYJ »

Sounds like you have all you need for the swap. Use the throttle body from your 92 and the power steering pump from the 2000 your bro totaled.
92tank
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 188
Joined: August 21st, 2010, 6:32 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.5
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: 99 intake

Post by 92tank »

ok thanks. i havent looked at it all that close yet, but in a pic that somone posted it looked like the 2000 intake used 3 bolts to hold the throttle body on. the 92 uses 4. but like i said i havent looked at the parts that close yet. (but i will today :banana: )
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: 99 intake

Post by SilverXJ »

All 91+ (non -renix) use 4 bolts to hold the throttle body down. They are pretty much all interchangeable with the exception of the later ones having the MAP sensor bolted to the throttle body.
92tank
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 188
Joined: August 21st, 2010, 6:32 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.5
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: 99 intake

Post by 92tank »

yeah i looked at it closer and see that know, thanks for the info
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3258
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: 99 intake

Post by Cheromaniac »

92tank wrote:ok so now that i have a 2000 intake i have some questions.

1. what throttle body/sensors do i use?
2. its going on a 92 cherokee, what power steering pump and ther stuff i use?
3. anything else you can think of would be appreiciated

BTW: i have the 2000 sitting here so the parts are avail. thanks to my brother who totaled it yesterday :doh:
and i plan on using the 92 fuel rail
I did the same swap nearly 2 years ago. The parts I swapped in were the '01 XJ intake manifold, PS pump, and mounting bracket with tensioner pulley. I reused the existing TB, injector rail/regulator, fuel lines, and injectors.
It was a straightforward swap except for needing to extend the wires to the IAT sensor and reroute a couple of vacuum lines.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
92tank
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 188
Joined: August 21st, 2010, 6:32 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.5
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: 99 intake

Post by 92tank »

ok thanks, the IAT is the temp sensor right?
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3258
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: 99 intake

Post by Cheromaniac »

Yup. IAT = Intake Air Temp.
92tank
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 188
Joined: August 21st, 2010, 6:32 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.5
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: 99 intake

Post by 92tank »

ok so i finally got around to putting the new intake and power steering on. probly woulnt have gotten to it yet but i had to change the motor mount on the intake side so well it was out i did the swap. well im not supper impressed with it. its not got any more power, unless the computer needs to relearn it. cause i lined mine up next to a stock 93 cherokee that my cousin has and he stayed right with me :oops: i dont know if it was cause i have 31s or all the extra weight in bumpers and being taller, but it was just sickening
User avatar
IH 392
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 725
Joined: October 4th, 2008, 11:15 am
Location: Eugene ORYGUN
Contact:

Re: 99 intake

Post by IH 392 »

When I installed mine I also installed a 62mm TB, I could feel in the "seat of the pants", but I believe the main benefit of the '99+ is that it lowers the power band a couple hundred RPM to more user friendly range.
You can get more power out of ANY engine!!!
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3258
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: 99 intake

Post by Cheromaniac »

IH 392 wrote:I believe the main benefit of the '99+ is that it lowers the power band a couple hundred RPM to more user friendly range.
Almost. These are my dyno numbers before and after my '01 intake swap:

HP
Before: 199.8rwhp @ 4750rpm
After: 201.7rwhp @ 4700rpm

TQ
Before: 253.7rwtq @ 3500rpm
After: 258.2rwtq @ 3400rpm

I also gained ~1mpg in fuel economy so that was the greatest benefit of all, and that was after I'd raised the MAP voltage to correct a lean condition immediately after the manifold swap.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
92tank
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 188
Joined: August 21st, 2010, 6:32 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.5
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: 99 intake

Post by 92tank »

yea the power band moved a little and fuel milage went up but im aslo running 92 oct in it i figure there robbing us anyways so why not spend the extra $4 a tank and have a happier jeep. but it still is sad that a stocker kept up with me.
User avatar
1bolt
Donator
Donator
Posts: 545
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 4:06 pm
Location: Culpeper Virginia

Re: 99 intake

Post by 1bolt »

92tank wrote:yea the power band moved a little and fuel milage went up but im aslo running 92 oct in it i figure there robbing us anyways so why not spend the extra $4 a tank and have a happier jeep. but it still is sad that a stocker kept up with me.
What gears did you upgrade to when you put the larger than stock tires on?
--
Simon
Looking for a 232 crankshaft see my want ad: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1292
http://www.jeepstrokers.com 94 XJ Stroked lifted locked. 89 MJ restored Work truck, 88 YJ going on third build up and second Stroker.
92tank
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 188
Joined: August 21st, 2010, 6:32 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.5
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: 99 intake

Post by 92tank »

i didnt upgrade the gears they are still the 3.55s
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3258
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: 99 intake

Post by Cheromaniac »

92tank wrote:yea the power band moved a little and fuel milage went up but im aslo running 92 oct in it i figure there robbing us anyways so why not spend the extra $4 a tank and have a happier jeep. but it still is sad that a stocker kept up with me.
Check the color of your plugs. My engine ran lean after the manifold swap (plugs were white) and I needed to raise the MAP sensor input voltage to compensate. The performance improvement wasn't great but I could feel a subtle difference by the SOTP, and gas mileage is still ~1mpg better than before even with the raised MAP voltage.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests