Throttle Body options...

Performance mods and Advanced Stroker discussion.
jeep_naked
Posts: 8
Joined: February 29th, 2008, 5:48 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.8L

Throttle Body options...

Post by jeep_naked »

Ok after searching the forums and reading a ton of posts I am going to have to ask this question. What are the options for DIY throttle bodies. I have seen people talk about 68mm from a Dakota 4.7L, I read about a Viper throttle body (as in the dodge car or is that the name of it) and then there is the Dino(tm) Mustang trick. I see how to make the Mustang tb work, but can't find how to adapt a Dakota or Viper tb to our beloved 4.0 (4.8 in my case) so I am still running the stock one until I can figure this all our and make a choice. Anyone have a write up on what needs to be modded to make them fit? Or at least want to share pics so I can see what needs to be done?
kf_chris
Where's the "any" key?
Where's the "any" key?
Posts: 22
Joined: October 31st, 2009, 4:15 am
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by kf_chris »

I had my stock TB bored out to 62mm
I haven't had the opportunity to swap it to a stocker, but I think that with the bigger TB, the snappier the throttle. So with my particular build, it's almost too touch, it really jumps off idle, which is nice, but my fiance can't drive it too well and I'd like something a little tamer. This is just my opinion. I do like the power and response no matter what though it's nice.
racing89
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 117
Joined: September 17th, 2010, 4:15 am
Stroker Displacement: 306 ci
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: comanche
Location: Barrington N.S.

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by racing89 »

Used to run the 72mm off the chevy central port injected v-8 or v-6( simple spacer plate required) Untill I made my own intake with 3x 52mm tbs off 3.5l intrepid
I6FAN
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 172
Joined: March 28th, 2010, 9:31 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.2
Vehicle Year: 1987
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: wrangler

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by I6FAN »

racing89 wrote:
Untill I made my own intake with 3x 52mm tbs off 3.5l intrepid
That sounds interesting, as we don't see very many custom intakes for these engines. 8-) Do you have any pictures you could share? :cheers:
User avatar
IH 392
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 725
Joined: October 4th, 2008, 11:15 am
Location: Eugene ORYGUN
Contact:

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by IH 392 »

kf_chris wrote: it's almost too touch, it really jumps off idle, which is nice, but my fiance can't drive it too well and I'd like something a little tamer.
Mine did have a similar reaction but it was the throttle plate sticking in the bore, I turned the closed position stop screw in to open the throttle plate some and it went away and drive just like the stock throttle body.
You can get more power out of ANY engine!!!
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
AlexTJ
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 126
Joined: July 9th, 2008, 11:07 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by AlexTJ »

Is the difference from a stock throttle body noticeable? I.e. Is it worth the trouble?
97 TJ - 4.7L - Lunati 63502 ftw
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3251
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by Cheromaniac »

Stick with a 62mm TB. It's all you need on a mild 4.6 stroker. My modified Mustang 65mm TB is overkill but I love the very sharp throttle response.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
aurichbb7
Where's the "any" key?
Where's the "any" key?
Posts: 23
Joined: September 20th, 2010, 12:09 pm
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: xj

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by aurichbb7 »

I am building a 4.5 with stock cam is 62mm where I want to be?
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by SilverXJ »

I ran my 63mm TB on my stock engine and it did fine. It does fine on my stroker as well. I got it from www.strokedjeep.com
racing89
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 117
Joined: September 17th, 2010, 4:15 am
Stroker Displacement: 306 ci
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: comanche
Location: Barrington N.S.

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by racing89 »

89 010.jpg
Sorry I forgot. This is a pic after the end of last season. The t.b.s are snorkled to an aluminum box containing 2x big a** K&N's
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
racing89
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 117
Joined: September 17th, 2010, 4:15 am
Stroker Displacement: 306 ci
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: comanche
Location: Barrington N.S.

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by racing89 »

Also rounded- up some old race pieces. stock (renix) , 62mm( homemade w/ ranger throttle plate), 72mm(chevy c.p.i. and adapter plate)
89 003.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
TJ9999
Noob
Noob
Posts: 11
Joined: September 30th, 2011, 6:49 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: TJ
Location: France

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by TJ9999 »

Cheromaniac wrote:Stick with a 62mm TB. It's all you need on a mild 4.6 stroker. My modified Mustang 65mm TB is overkill but I love the very sharp throttle response.
I had an Edge Performance 62mm TB on my 4.7 stroker during 2 months. It was great on the road, very responsive. But it was way too touchy in the dirt, it was impossible to keep constant (low) speed or to crawl up a hill without the jeep jerking forward on/off. So I removed it and sold it.
Now a year later I want to try a Hesco 62mm TB in combination with a ported manifold and 24 lb/s injectors (instead of the stock 19 lb/s) and see if the offroad drivability is better. (power will be better for sure).
TJ Rubicon 4.7L stroker 2004 *** Willys M201 ex french army 1957
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by SilverXJ »

You must have money to burn. A 62mm throttle body is a 62mm throttle body. Edge and Hesco are nothing special. Try www.strokedjeep.com
User avatar
TJ9999
Noob
Noob
Posts: 11
Joined: September 30th, 2011, 6:49 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: TJ
Location: France

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by TJ9999 »

SilverXJ wrote:You must have money to burn. A 62mm throttle body is a 62mm throttle body. Edge and Hesco are nothing special. Try http://www.strokedjeep.com
Not really burning money as I bought these parts secondhand. ;)
TJ Rubicon 4.7L stroker 2004 *** Willys M201 ex french army 1957
tequila mike
Learning to use the board
Learning to use the board
Posts: 37
Joined: September 22nd, 2011, 9:17 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6?
Vehicle Year: 1991
Vehicle Make: heep
Vehicle Model: wrangler
Location: san leandro ca. sf bay area

Re: Throttle Body options...

Post by tequila mike »

My 4.6 something started with 60 mm, worked good. Went to 62mm and low end torque increased (felt unstoppable) freeway speed came easier.
Went to the ford 65mm and freeway still great, but low end torque seemed to drop off some.
Heard it has to do with velocity as opposed to volume.
At some point i will go back to 62mm, works really well for my setup..
M
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests