New 4.6L stroker build

Project vehicle blogs or "mod diary" specific threads only.. Pics encouraged!!
Post Reply
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by SilverXJ »

What would i be using something that can spark for?
lafrad
Movin on up ^
Movin on up ^
Posts: 357
Joined: February 25th, 2009, 10:40 am

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by lafrad »

"Put a small groove" in things that are metal often comes with high RPM spinn-y devices... thats all ;-)
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by SilverXJ »

Ahh crap. Having looked at the block from upside down for the past month or so I forgot where the stock oil hole is on the cam bearings when the block is in the correct orientation. Its already at about the 2:15 position. Its recommended that the oil hole be placed at the 2 to 3 position with the load coming at the 12 position. So.. I'm not sure if these bearings will help any.. just so I can rotate the bearings just slightly. I suppose I can still use them.. maybe put another oil hole someplace in them.. but where then?

I'll have to get a good head on picture of the actual block to illustrate.
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by SilverXJ »

lafrad wrote:"Put a small groove" in things that are metal often comes with high RPM spinn-y devices... thats all ;-)
Ahh... I understand.... it would be a dremel... haven't decided on a bit yet... and i don't think the bearing material will spark.
dwg86
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1245
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 6:20 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6
Vehicle Year: 2003
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by dwg86 »

Did you check to see if ACL makes an aluminum cam bearing for the Jeep 6, or one from another engine that will work? They make make aluminum race cam bearings for some engines.
lafrad
Movin on up ^
Movin on up ^
Posts: 357
Joined: February 25th, 2009, 10:40 am

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by lafrad »

I'm pretty sure the 'backing" on most rebuild cam bearings are steel. I wouldn't do anything with fast sanding devices. Keep it to a manual file or a REALLY SLOW spinning burr tool.

I ran into this problem through experiance. Went through 3 sets of main bearings trying to find a proper setup to 360*-oil them (in turn, to 360* oil the rods... the thought here is that 360 of oiling to the rods would sling more oil at the cam, at the expense of some main bearing surface area, which, on a 7 main I6, is at a HUGE excess....)
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by SilverXJ »

dwg86 wrote:Did you check to see if ACL makes an aluminum cam bearing for the Jeep 6, or one from another engine that will work? They make make aluminum race cam bearings for some engines.
Yeah, I already checked. They only make the standard babbit, as do all the others.
lafrad wrote:I'm pretty sure the 'backing" on most rebuild cam bearings are steel. I wouldn't do anything with fast sanding devices. Keep it to a manual file or a REALLY SLOW spinning burr tool.
I wasn't planning on using any abrasive bit as I don't want abrasives becoming embedded in the babbit.
I ran into this problem through experiance. Went through 3 sets of main bearings trying to find a proper setup to 360*-oil them (in turn, to 360* oil the rods... the thought here is that 360 of oiling to the rods would sling more oil at the cam, at the expense of some main bearing surface area, which, on a 7 main I6, is at a HUGE excess....)
How deep and wide of a groove did you go with? I've heard of people removing the locating tang on another set of top bearings and putting those in the bottom for 360* oiling.
lafrad
Movin on up ^
Movin on up ^
Posts: 357
Joined: February 25th, 2009, 10:40 am

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by lafrad »

My final (and current) solution was to use another set of top shells. i ground the locator on the main cap wider (so the tang still properly located the shell), and then got a little risky and smudged a touch of JB weld in the "Old" tang area, basically putting the filler in to still have the shell positively located in the horizontal direction. After the JB weld hardened, I pulled the bearing out and sanded the JB down a bit, so any thermal expansion differences would not interfere with bearing shell roundness.

after 14K miles I have no issues to speak of, and the HV pump has no problem keeping up with the new oiling demands... 20+ psi at Hot idle with 5W40 Synthetic oil.
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by SilverXJ »

Here is the issue I am talking about:
Image
Image

Here is the full image of the bearing alignment, taken from http://www.dura-bondbearing.com/Portals ... lletin.pdf:
Image

That is pretty much were the stock oil hole goes. I am not sure the benefit of the bearings with the OD grove unless I position the hole more clock wise, but I don't know if that is of benefit. Is it? Or if I drill another oil hole in the cam bearing. I'm not even sure why Durabond offers these bearings in this case. But it does explain why they are the only ones that offer them.
User avatar
Exos
Consistent
Consistent
Posts: 280
Joined: December 2nd, 2008, 1:35 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1998
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by Exos »

This is getting pretty complicated. Maybe I'm just lucky, but I've had no issue whatsoever yet, after 15000 km. In fact, the engine is giving me more than I expected. I've done no modifications to anything to get it to fit. I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
I6FAN
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 172
Joined: March 28th, 2010, 9:31 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.2
Vehicle Year: 1987
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: wrangler

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by I6FAN »

Looking at the hole for cam bearing lube, it looks like if there wasn't enough back pressure further down stream in the line feeding the main and rod, I could see the oil going straight past the cam bearing without being forced down into it. You ground a port in the side of the rod bearings for cam lobe oiling, and I thought I heard someone report that their bearings also came without the oiler holes in the bearings. Do you think there could be too much oil liberation at this point due to the ARP rod bolt having a different architecture and size than the stockers; maybe they don't relieve them depending on the hardware used?
P1200309.jpg
P1200654.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by SilverXJ »

The stock bearings had the notch, the Clevite bearings did not, but the King bearings I have now do. It is a fairly small hole that the oil passes through and I thing that if that was draining off that much oil pressure there would be main and rod bearing damage. Remember that the oil has to pas through the rod bearing to get to that hole in the first place. Plus I also had 40 PSI hot at idle at the rear of the block.
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by SilverXJ »

Here is a pic of where the journals were rubbing the bearings near the oil hole.
Image
I6FAN
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 172
Joined: March 28th, 2010, 9:31 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.2
Vehicle Year: 1987
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: wrangler

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by I6FAN »

It looks like the rubbing is kind of biased towards one side of the bearing. I wonder if that was the first half or last half that was inserted into the journal? I'm curious about the clearance at the rubbing point and offset to it. I would think this limits the amount of lubricant for that "wedge" effect if used as is.
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Post by SilverXJ »

#1 and #2 it would be the second half, #3 and #4 would be the first half. I'm wondering about the clearance there too.. possibly rubbing up against the oil hole and blocking it. One person on speedtalk said it looks like possible distortion when the oil hole was punched in the bearing.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 0 guests