4.7 Stroker ????? Need big help

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
Post Reply
1991YJ
Posts: 5
Joined: January 4th, 2010, 8:20 pm
Vehicle Year: 1991
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

4.7 Stroker ????? Need big help

Post by 1991YJ »

I am wanting to use 4.2 crank and rods, and bore the block .060 over and get the corresponding pistons, yet every time i run compression ratio numbers they come up way high.... I want to run this on 91 pump octane maximum, i would prefer 89 or 87. I would like to know what you guys think about whether i should use the .043 head gasket, port the head, injectors, valve job, camshaft, everything and all details like that. Sorry but explain it to me as if i were an infant.... im still quite picking this stuff up after months of research.... Thanks for your help guys. Also this is kinda on a budget.... so we cant go out of the world on prices.... I know im asking alot..... but thanks guys.
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3241
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: 4.7 Stroker ????? Need big help

Post by Cheromaniac »

You could do a close copy of the 4.7L medium buck recipe in my site.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
1991YJ
Posts: 5
Joined: January 4th, 2010, 8:20 pm
Vehicle Year: 1991
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: 4.7 Stroker ????? Need big help

Post by 1991YJ »

Would i have to use the 4.0 rods and the 68mm throttle body?
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3241
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: 4.7 Stroker ????? Need big help

Post by Cheromaniac »

1991YJ wrote:Would i have to use the 4.0 rods and the 68mm throttle body?
You could use the 4.0 rods/IC944 pistons in the recipe or go for 4.2 rods/H825CP pistons for the same 9.6:1 CR but with a higher quench. A 62mm TB will suffice.
1991YJ
Posts: 5
Joined: January 4th, 2010, 8:20 pm
Vehicle Year: 1991
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: 4.7 Stroker ????? Need big help

Post by 1991YJ »

I plan on going with a 65mm mustang tb and i will do some research on your setups... with a 9.6 to 1 cr can i run 89 pump gas? Also i plan on posting the head to match the intake, and also porting the cumbustion chamber around the valves, cant i reduce the cr that way if i want to lower my quench?
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3241
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: 4.7 Stroker ????? Need big help

Post by Cheromaniac »

1991YJ wrote:I plan on going with a 65mm mustang tb and i will do some research on your setups... with a 9.6 to 1 cr can i run 89 pump gas? Also i plan on posting the head to match the intake, and also porting the cumbustion chamber around the valves, cant i reduce the cr that way if i want to lower my quench?
The answer to both questions is yes but be careful when unshrouding the valves that you don't cut the edge of the combustion chamber beyond the margin of the head gasket bore.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: 4.7 Stroker ????? Need big help

Post by SilverXJ »

1991YJ wrote:I plan on going with a 65mm mustang tb and i will do some research on your setups... with a 9.6 to 1 cr can i run 89 pump gas?
Doubtful unless you get a can that reduces your SCR.
Also i plan on posting the head to match the intake, and also porting the cumbustion chamber around the valves, cant i reduce the cr that way if i want to lower my quench?
You will most likely not be able to remove much material from around the valves. You would have to remove quite a bit of material to make a noticeable difference in your compression ratio.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 8 guests