Economy

Performance mods and Advanced Stroker discussion.
Post Reply
cjackson3396
Where's the "any" key?
Where's the "any" key?
Posts: 27
Joined: October 9th, 2009, 4:20 pm
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Economy

Post by cjackson3396 »

My 4.7 stroker project has stalled for a bit...So i figured i'd ask everyone a quick question on their experiances with the stroker. Right now the 96 XJ is as i bought it...stock gears stock 4.0 5speed with 114,000 has 35inch tires.....I get about 11mpg if i'm lucky. If i put in 4:10 or 4:56 gears with my 4.7 engine I'm building...will I see better MPG it isn't the biggest concern but I was curious. The 4.7 is a 94-block 99-intake 81-4.2 rods and crank. I'm going to put in a longer duration cam of course. as for the expensive stuff I didn't do as in performance pistons and all the head work..it will have a pretty free flowing exhaust and a k&n air filter if we don't modify it for ram air.
User avatar
Biggrnjeep97
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 114
Joined: December 10th, 2008, 5:40 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler
Location: Wash.,DC

Re: Economy

Post by Biggrnjeep97 »

You will see better fuel economy. Will it be good? no. Should you care? no. What you will gain from re-gearing is better driveablity and a happier trans.
-Will
4.7 Stroker, AW4, Dana 60, 14Bolt, AtlasII 4.3, 104"Wb, 40" Nittos on Walker Evans
ilber
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 81
Joined: September 14th, 2009, 8:32 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.7
Vehicle Year: 1993
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: YJ HO

Re: Economy

Post by ilber »

the one^^^^ tells the truth.
I betcha that you drive with flooring the skinny pedal, but with lower gearing you would not need to strain the engine as much. Yes you would have more rev per min at the same speed but you are n a better spot for the TQ. Look at that a 4 hole wrangler does not get better milage than my 6 cylinder, becuase it is being taxed all the time-more fuel...
alternatively... I drive a 6.0L car and get mid 20's in town, because if i floored...well I will be going to prison or will kill someone... so I usually less than 40% load get the job done very well... and in return i get decent milage and can justify driving a nicer car as DD
Regear it! milage would be in low teens anyways, but you would have way more "fun to drive" factor.

ilber
YJason
Donator
Donator
Posts: 132
Joined: May 1st, 2009, 6:40 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6

Re: Economy

Post by YJason »

17/14 mpg in my YJ w/33's, 4:10's, AW4 trans, and 4.6 but I have to run 93 octane.
yuppiexj
Donator
Donator
Posts: 319
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 7:31 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.5 needs assembly
Location: Fredercksburg VA (land of nothing)

Re: Economy

Post by yuppiexj »

My stock engined 88 XJ got 21/18 with 4.56 gears and 32s. (230K miles too)

it was like driving with the parking brake off when I swapped out the 3.55 for 4.56 axles.
Sure the engine spun a little bit more on the highway at 80+, but the drivability was worth the (potential) trade off in engine life.

Regear
TurboTom wrote:i will eat my words later if need be.
TurboTom wrote: Not sure of your rules...but you need to start with an engine that works best for the rules and cheat from there!
Proud owner of many stroker parts, that have not yet spontaneously assembled themselves.
User avatar
Jeep4xb4u
Donator
Donator
Posts: 75
Joined: August 3rd, 2008, 6:44 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: XJ 2dr
Vehicle Model: Sport
Location: BAY AREA / CA
Contact:

Re: Economy

Post by Jeep4xb4u »

I slapped 4.88's on mine with 33's only a few weeks after lifting because i couldn't stand the sluggish characteristics. Do it and never look back, you may find yourself using your 5th gear more but you wont be disappointed. I went a little over kill with 4.88's but its funner then heck from 0-40 specially with the new engine, but leaves brown stains in me and my passengers underwear on the highway. :oops:

As for fuel efficiency, if you select the correct gears you shouldn't loose much if any. As others have said, you wont be pressing that pedal as much to get to point "b".
88' XJ 2dr
4.0l / AW4 / NP231 / D35c
6.5" Long Arm Lift - 33x12.5's - 15x8 Mickey's

Currently working on 4.6l / D44 Swap
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3252
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: Economy

Post by Cheromaniac »

My 4.6L stroker with '01 XJ intake delivers better fuel economy on the highway and the same fuel economy in the city as my old 4.0L engine. The reason is that I can drive the stroker on a lighter throttle to go just as fast.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :lol:
crustodd
Donator
Donator
Posts: 146
Joined: November 18th, 2008, 4:29 pm
Stroker Displacement: 284
Vehicle Year: 1994
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ

Re: Economy

Post by crustodd »

4:56's with 35"s will put you about equal to stock gearing, but the 35"s are WAY heavier. The stroker's extra torque will compensate for that some, but again it takes more energy to get that mass rolling and will put more wear and tear on the drivetrain and brakes to stop them. FUN costs $$$ :huh:
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests