Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
-
- Noob
- Posts: 15
- Joined: January 8th, 2011, 2:10 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.0L
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Wrangler
- Vehicle Model: sahara
Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
Hi,
All of this going in a Jeep Wrangler 97 that I 'm building for the street and strip. With 4 wheeling.
Parts list:
TURBO Garrett GT40
Tial wastegate 44mm
Tial BOV 50mm
Injector
Fuel system
B&M Shifter
"http://www.qzal.net"
http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/posti ... e=post&f=8#
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
All of this going in a Jeep Wrangler 97 that I 'm building for the street and strip. With 4 wheeling.
Parts list:
TURBO Garrett GT40
Tial wastegate 44mm
Tial BOV 50mm
Injector
Fuel system
B&M Shifter
"http://www.qzal.net"
http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/posti ... e=post&f=8#
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
"http://www.qzal.net"
-
- Noob
- Posts: 15
- Joined: January 8th, 2011, 2:10 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.0L
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Wrangler
- Vehicle Model: sahara
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40 with Dyno result
Dyno result soon
- gradon
- Donator
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
- Vehicle Year: 1996
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: DC
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
Yeah. . . that's um. . . pretty cool
- doublins
- I made it to triple digits!
- Posts: 129
- Joined: January 20th, 2010, 11:21 am
- Stroker Displacement: 5.2L V8 (was 4.7L)
- Vehicle Year: 1998
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Wrangler
- Location: Crofton, MD
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
No intercooler? How much boost are you planning on running?
p.s. props to you- I absolutely love turbochargers, have owned several vehicles that I installed aftermarket turbos on, and there is just no equal.
That being said, if you´re going to run any legitimate amount of boost, I fear you will have problems with your IATs without an intercooler, unless it is cold where you live. It would never work in summer in Maryland, though.
p.s. props to you- I absolutely love turbochargers, have owned several vehicles that I installed aftermarket turbos on, and there is just no equal.
That being said, if you´re going to run any legitimate amount of boost, I fear you will have problems with your IATs without an intercooler, unless it is cold where you live. It would never work in summer in Maryland, though.
-
- Noob
- Posts: 15
- Joined: January 8th, 2011, 2:10 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.0L
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Wrangler
- Vehicle Model: sahara
Re: Stock engine 4.0L turbo GT40
Thanks a lot Doublins for your comment >>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately I don't buy intercooler until now and I will buy one soon, I running on dyno 332WHP and 385TQ with only 8 PSI of boost.
Now summer is begin and my ghost sleep until the summer is finished because the weather is too much hot
My plan to make stroker at less 4.8L and increase more boost around 20 PSI
Unfortunately I don't buy intercooler until now and I will buy one soon, I running on dyno 332WHP and 385TQ with only 8 PSI of boost.
Now summer is begin and my ghost sleep until the summer is finished because the weather is too much hot
My plan to make stroker at less 4.8L and increase more boost around 20 PSI
-
- BANNED
- Posts: 297
- Joined: December 3rd, 2011, 2:01 am
- Vehicle Year: 1998
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
If you use a bored throttle body and 99+ intake manifold you would see more HP/TQ at same boost.
1998 XJ 2D AW4 32"MTR 3.55 4.5"RC JCR Slider Magnaflow 150rwHP/174rwTQ=> Sprintex SC Gibson Header 6lb 120-140*IAT 211rwHP/274rwTQ WasherFluid Inj 70mmTB 7.5lb 100-120*IAT=>Now 12 pounds Boost=> +BV ported head
99 XJ M62 S/C
99 XJ M62 S/C
-
- I made it to triple digits!
- Posts: 137
- Joined: November 27th, 2011, 9:24 pm
- Vehicle Year: 1995
- Vehicle Model: XJ
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
An intercooler is still a good part to have, but you could lower your air temps with using an water/meth kit in the mean time. I'd suggest running 100% water for now until you boost higher and need the added fuel (meth).
-
- Noob
- Posts: 15
- Joined: January 8th, 2011, 2:10 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.0L
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Wrangler
- Vehicle Model: sahara
-
- Making Progress
- Posts: 99
- Joined: March 22nd, 2008, 9:43 am
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
604rail_king wrote:An intercooler is still a good part to have, but you could lower your air temps with using an water/meth kit in the mean time. I'd suggest running 100% water for now until you boost higher and need the added fuel (meth).
i think you should definitely have this(water&methanol)
i'm running 50/50 mix, its gives you an intercooler effect,raises the octan level to about 110-116 (according to what the snow performance and aem says), eliminating detonation, and your get a much bigger tuning window without damagin the engine
-
- Noob
- Posts: 15
- Joined: January 8th, 2011, 2:10 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.0L
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Wrangler
- Vehicle Model: sahara
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
Thanks a lot CobraMarty >>>>>>>>>>>>CobraMarty wrote:If you use a bored throttle body and 99+ intake manifold you would see more HP/TQ at same boost.
I know that when bored throttle body and 99+ intake manifold you would see more HP and TQ but I fear for engine damage, because I don't have intercooler
-
- Noob
- Posts: 15
- Joined: January 8th, 2011, 2:10 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.0L
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Wrangler
- Vehicle Model: sahara
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
Thanks a lot 604rail_king for your devise >>>>>>>>>>>604rail_king wrote:An intercooler is still a good part to have, but you could lower your air temps with using an water/meth kit in the mean time. I'd suggest running 100% water for now until you boost higher and need the added fuel (meth).
I bought AEM water injection kit and I will Install it & see the result.
-
- Noob
- Posts: 15
- Joined: January 8th, 2011, 2:10 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.0L
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Wrangler
- Vehicle Model: sahara
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
atias wrote:604rail_king wrote:An intercooler is still a good part to have, but you could lower your air temps with using an water/meth kit in the mean time. I'd suggest running 100% water for now until you boost higher and need the added fuel (meth).
i think you should definitely have this(water&methanol)
i'm running 50/50 mix, its gives you an intercooler effect,raises the octan level to about 110-116 (according to what the snow performance and aem says), eliminating detonation, and your get a much bigger tuning window without damagin the engine
I will try to put VP fuel race Q16 and meth
-
- Making Progress
- Posts: 99
- Joined: March 22nd, 2008, 9:43 am
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
you need the C-16 is for high intake temps not the Q-16 ,i think the Q16 is highly oxygenated to gain more power. not good for you
-
- Noob
- Posts: 15
- Joined: January 8th, 2011, 2:10 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.0L
- Vehicle Year: 1997
- Vehicle Make: Wrangler
- Vehicle Model: sahara
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
atias wrote:you need the C-16 is for high intake temps not the Q-16 ,i think the Q16 is highly oxygenated to gain more power. not good for you
Unfortunately I bought Q16 for it , and I will see what performance I will get.
-
- BANNED
- Posts: 297
- Joined: December 3rd, 2011, 2:01 am
- Vehicle Year: 1998
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40
Yes it will be more power but with less boost and with less boost-less heat with no intercooler. Safer.CobraMarty wrote:If you use a bored throttle body and 99+ intake manifold you would see more HP/TQ at same boost.
1998 XJ 2D AW4 32"MTR 3.55 4.5"RC JCR Slider Magnaflow 150rwHP/174rwTQ=> Sprintex SC Gibson Header 6lb 120-140*IAT 211rwHP/274rwTQ WasherFluid Inj 70mmTB 7.5lb 100-120*IAT=>Now 12 pounds Boost=> +BV ported head
99 XJ M62 S/C
99 XJ M62 S/C
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests