Possible 4.8L Build

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
User avatar
PolloLoco
Donator
Donator
Posts: 212
Joined: March 8th, 2009, 6:39 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: TJ
Location: DeRidder, LA

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by PolloLoco »

Muad'Dib wrote:I am looking for the uniqueness factor .. but im also looking for the best bang for my buck. Its actually a cheaper build going with a 4.8 as the pistons are way cheaper than kb944's.

kb944 = 607.99
kb364 = 336.39

Arent the 944's just a standard "D" dish? cause its the same on the fords...

So you think i could get better performance with a 4.7L build? Even running on pump gas (premium is fine)? That may be the determining factor then ...
I came up with this post from googling "uem-kb945-060"
viewtopic.php?f=15&t=225#p2481
You listed $607.99, all 8-sets cost that much. It looks like you can order a set of six for $478.69, should help the wallet a bit.

Again my googling comes into question with my previous post in this threat.
4.7L Stroker, 4.88 Ford 8.8 w/Auburn ECTED, HP30 w/ARB, AX-15, NP231 w/RR SYE, 33x10.50 BFG A/T, 4" Skyjacker, 1" body lift, 1" MORE motor mounts, Kilby fuel tank skid, UCF ultra-high clearance 1/4" skid, HMMWV-style snorkel, 63mm TB
User avatar
Mgardiner1
Donator
Donator
Posts: 574
Joined: August 2nd, 2008, 6:19 pm
Stroker Displacement: 284 CI
Location: Wading River, NY

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by Mgardiner1 »

KB945 have an 11.38cc dish (high compression ratio)
KB944 have a 21.73cc dish (lower compression ratio)
oletshot wrote:....and silvolites are only cast not hypericantspellits. :-)
User avatar
oletshot
Donator
Donator
Posts: 221
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 11:47 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by oletshot »

I must admit, after clicking on the link to the ford pistons, they are quite interesting!
I'm not clever enough to have a clever signature. I'll just steal yours.
'98 XJ 2-door, '94 YJ.
User avatar
Muad'Dib
Site Admin / Owner
Site Admin / Owner
Posts: 1497
Joined: January 8th, 2008, 10:55 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1990
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Bend, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by Muad'Dib »

Now you got me all confused!! lol
If it feels right, then STROKE it!
You're lucky that hundred shot of CAPS LOCK didn't blow the welds on the forum!!
User avatar
Muad'Dib
Site Admin / Owner
Site Admin / Owner
Posts: 1497
Joined: January 8th, 2008, 10:55 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1990
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Bend, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by Muad'Dib »

Does anyone else have anything to add to this thread?

Can i really squeeze better performance / numbers (HP/Torque) out of a 4.7 build rather than a 4.8?
If it feels right, then STROKE it!
You're lucky that hundred shot of CAPS LOCK didn't blow the welds on the forum!!
User avatar
mendelmax
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 110
Joined: March 16th, 2009, 4:25 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6
Location: Europe, Poland, Katowice

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by mendelmax »

Muad'Dib wrote:Can i really squeeze better performance / numbers (HP/Torque) out of a 4.7 build rather than a 4.8?
I'm a newbie here, and I've built only one stroker so far, but I'll share one thought. It is a HUGE estimation, and cannot be used for precise calculations, but gives an idea of what to expect.

There is an empiric formula about the performance gain from compression ratio rise. It assumes that all other parameters (timing, rods, pistons, fuel grade etc) are exactly the same. It is

NP= OP x (E2/E1) ^ (0.365 x n)

where:
NP- new power
OP- old power
E2- new compression ratio
E1- old compression ratio
n- number of cylinders

So, what I meant to say is that with for example rising CR from 8.8 to 9.2 on stock, 4.0 190HP I6 you can get 210 HP. A 10% improvement. To achieve the same from the displacement you'd have to bore it to 4.4 liters at stock 8.8.

What I mean is that doing engine properly, with really good quench and high CR you can easily outperform the 0.1L bigger engine that had to be made with certain compromises.
jsawduste
My keyboard is getting warn out
My keyboard is getting warn out
Posts: 1032
Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.9
Location: Michigan

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by jsawduste »

FWIW I went .080 over on my 93 block. No heartburn thus far. The engine has gotten HOT several times from slow wheeling in heavy mud plus forgetting to turn the electric fan on after a water crossing...... :doh:
User avatar
Muad'Dib
Site Admin / Owner
Site Admin / Owner
Posts: 1497
Joined: January 8th, 2008, 10:55 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1990
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Bend, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by Muad'Dib »

jsawduste wrote:FWIW I went .080 over on my 93 block. No heartburn thus far. The engine has gotten HOT several times from slow wheeling in heavy mud plus forgetting to turn the electric fan on after a water crossing...... :doh:
What pistons did you use? Custom?
If it feels right, then STROKE it!
You're lucky that hundred shot of CAPS LOCK didn't blow the welds on the forum!!
User avatar
Muad'Dib
Site Admin / Owner
Site Admin / Owner
Posts: 1497
Joined: January 8th, 2008, 10:55 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1990
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Bend, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by Muad'Dib »

Bump ..

And i also found out today there is no one in the area who can sonic check a block! WTF!! im screwed.
If it feels right, then STROKE it!
You're lucky that hundred shot of CAPS LOCK didn't blow the welds on the forum!!
User avatar
Plechtan
Donator
Donator
Posts: 667
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 9:00 am
Stroker Displacement: 5.0L 4x4
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Woodstock, IL
Contact:

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by Plechtan »

I just saw a tester on ebay, only $1,095.00 Maybe uou can rent it out to the local engine shops. Also comes with a probe for heads to measure port thickness.
Peter Lechtanski
The worlds Fastest Comanche Prroject
yuppiexj
Donator
Donator
Posts: 319
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 7:31 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.5 needs assembly
Location: Fredercksburg VA (land of nothing)

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by yuppiexj »

I sense another "expensive tool" rental dealio coming up.

if only I had $1000 to invest in a sonic tester :(
TurboTom wrote:i will eat my words later if need be.
TurboTom wrote: Not sure of your rules...but you need to start with an engine that works best for the rules and cheat from there!
Proud owner of many stroker parts, that have not yet spontaneously assembled themselves.
User avatar
Muad'Dib
Site Admin / Owner
Site Admin / Owner
Posts: 1497
Joined: January 8th, 2008, 10:55 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1990
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Bend, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by Muad'Dib »

Man .. i'm really sceptical about getting machine work done in my area now if they are all saying they don't have a sonic checking machine... I mean really what kind of machine shop doesnt spring 1-3,000 for something like this.

I hope i dont have to take my stuff over the cascades and into the valley just for decent machine work.
If it feels right, then STROKE it!
You're lucky that hundred shot of CAPS LOCK didn't blow the welds on the forum!!
User avatar
Plechtan
Donator
Donator
Posts: 667
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 9:00 am
Stroker Displacement: 5.0L 4x4
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Woodstock, IL
Contact:

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by Plechtan »

you anywhere near Salem? tru this http://www.salemspeedshop.com/ if they cannot do the work, they can tell you who can.
Peter Lechtanski
The worlds Fastest Comanche Prroject
User avatar
Muad'Dib
Site Admin / Owner
Site Admin / Owner
Posts: 1497
Joined: January 8th, 2008, 10:55 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7L
Vehicle Year: 1990
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Bend, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by Muad'Dib »

Salem is over the Cascades in the valley... im hoping to avoid that. (Salem is about 150 miles away over the mountains) Im "Central Oregon"... which technically can be considered eastern oregon. There is nothing really "decent" east of the Cascade mountain range it seems..
If it feels right, then STROKE it!
You're lucky that hundred shot of CAPS LOCK didn't blow the welds on the forum!!
jsawduste
My keyboard is getting warn out
My keyboard is getting warn out
Posts: 1032
Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.9
Location: Michigan

Re: Possible 4.8L Build

Post by jsawduste »

Muad'Dib wrote:
jsawduste wrote:FWIW I went .080 over on my 93 block. No heartburn thus far. The engine has gotten HOT several times from slow wheeling in heavy mud plus forgetting to turn the electric fan on after a water crossing...... :doh:
What pistons did you use? Custom?
Diamonds, who are also the supplier to Hesco.

Moved the pin for the Eagle rod and set it for a zero deck. 9.56 calculated compression with a .042 gasket.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest