TB vs. Intake manifold

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
Post Reply
dingo151
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 57
Joined: December 11th, 2008, 11:07 am

TB vs. Intake manifold

Post by dingo151 »

Hey everybody!


I've been reading up on the board about boring out a TB vs. replacing an early intake with a 99+ Intake and I was wondering if anyone that had some experience with both had an opinion of which they would choose to do if they had to do it over again? I'm building a mild 4.6 and I'm trying to decide if I should bore out my TB or find a manifold or both?


Opinions?



Thanks
Dean
"You'll bunk with private Joker. He's silly and he's ignorant but he's got GUTS and guts are enough!"
User avatar
IH 392
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 725
Joined: October 4th, 2008, 11:15 am
Location: Eugene ORYGUN
Contact:

Re: TB vs. Intake manifold

Post by IH 392 »

On my 4.0 I did both at the same time, there is a noticeable increase in acceleration, the strokers need more air so I can't see how they wouldn't benefit from both.
You can get more power out of ANY engine!!!
ASE Master certified engine machinist, gas and diesel
User avatar
gradon
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1353
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: DC

Re: TB vs. Intake manifold

Post by gradon »

Change that vs. to an &.
eliv1
I think I'll order a "tab"
I think I'll order a "tab"
Posts: 41
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 11:15 pm

Re: TB vs. Intake manifold

Post by eliv1 »

i did these mod's day after day,

the first day i made a 63 TB, installed it and immdietly felt a far better throttle response, the next day i install a borla header and the 99+ intake and the engine is now a killer, i love it!

coclusion - do both!

btw, if your intrested in a throttle body bore out, i make them and sell over ebay, or you could have oleshot do one for you.
my price to a forum member would be 60$ + shipping.

if your intrested pm me...

anyway good luck!
88 CJ8, 4.5L Stroker ,P&P Head ,Compcam 68-231-4 cam , 4.0L Junkyard MPI , 99 Intake, Borla Header,2.5" Flowmaster + piping,Electric Fans;SUA 4" lift on 33" tires ;4.11's Dana 44 F&R LockRight , High Steer with CTM's ;OBA;Full Cage.
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3190
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: TB vs. Intake manifold

Post by Cheromaniac »

I have a modified Mustang 65mm TB bolted with a tapered 65mm to 62mm TB spacer onto my original '92 manifold. The throttle response is super sharp but I now have the intake manifold/PS pump/tensioner bracket with idler pulley from an '01 XJ ready to swap in. Just need to port-match the manifold runners to the combination gasket (my head is already gasket-matched) before I drop it in.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :mrgreen:
dingo151
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 57
Joined: December 11th, 2008, 11:07 am

Re: TB vs. Intake manifold

Post by dingo151 »

Thanks for the input guys. I'm going to a jeep swapmeet this weekend and that's one of the things on my list. I can get a 99+ intake from a Jy close to me for 75$ is that about right price wise?


Thanks
Dean
"You'll bunk with private Joker. He's silly and he's ignorant but he's got GUTS and guts are enough!"
User avatar
amcinstaller
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 609
Joined: May 22nd, 2008, 11:57 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1980
Vehicle Make: AMC
Vehicle Model: Spirit
Location: Red Deer, AB, Can

Re: TB vs. Intake manifold

Post by amcinstaller »

sounds about right. but what all does it come with? any other brackets?
1980 AMC Spirit Restomod in Progress
SilverXJ wrote:Roller rockers won't help that mess you have created. Nor will God for that matter.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests