Open Discussion-Cam Advance/Retard

Performance mods and Advanced Stroker discussion.
jsawduste
My keyboard is getting warn out
My keyboard is getting warn out
Posts: 1032
Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.9
Location: Michigan

Re: Open Discussion-Cam Advance/Retard

Post by jsawduste »

amcinstaller wrote:if some ecus run bank fire (fire an entire injector bank at once) then injector timing cant be all that critical.
Can someone please explain (if injector timing cannot be adjusted) why when turning the dizzy on a running engine. One extreme (say clockwise) causes the engine to run rough and then turning the dizzy CCW results in the engine stumbling again ? The sweet spot being somewhere between these to extremes.

I have had the dizzy turned in such a way (misadjusted) that the engine would kick back-like the ingition timing was to far advanced-while cranking ?

Another part of Benny and my conversation was his comment that whenever Hesco gets a 4.0 in for service. One of the first things they do is loosen the dizzy and find that sweet spot again. All in the name of readjusting the CMP for a worn timing chain. Which he claims often makes for smoother running engine.
User avatar
Mgardiner1
Donator
Donator
Posts: 574
Joined: August 2nd, 2008, 6:19 pm
Stroker Displacement: 284 CI
Location: Wading River, NY

Re: Open Discussion-Cam Advance/Retard

Post by Mgardiner1 »

Turning the dizzy simply changes the timing events of when the CMP goes high and low. If the flywheel (CKP) sequence for #3 has entered its timing notches, or # 5 has not yet finished, the ECU gets confused and does not know which cylinders is to be fired next, creating a rough running situation. I had a several page thread going on how my engine was breaking up at a very specific RPM range, but idled smooth and revved up to 2500 RPM smooth, but from 2500 to 3000 it would cough and miss and break up, over 3000 was ok. I adjusted my dizzy as per some help with a member on here, and it completely solved my issues. It just had to do with the sequence of events between the CMP and CKP.

amcinstaller wrote:if some ecus run bank fire (fire an entire injector bank at once) then injector timing cant be all that critical. i tihnk actually the magic number is in the injector pulse width rather than the timing.
Maybe so, but the 4.0 system is a sequential fuel injection system, which fires each injector individually.
oletshot wrote:....and silvolites are only cast not hypericantspellits. :-)
User avatar
1bolt
Donator
Donator
Posts: 545
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 4:06 pm
Location: Culpeper Virginia

Re: Open Discussion-Cam Advance/Retard

Post by 1bolt »

From what I've read sequential systems show small improvements in fuel efficiency and power at very low RPM's after a couple thousand RPM's batch fire does just as well. Once the engine is really spinning It really is the amount of fuel available being correct that's more important than the timing of the spray.

From what I've read on max effort engines putting the injector further up stream often helps power. This means that a precise injector opening event, timed to fire down the open valve are impossible. Appearently even though the fuel is displacing air, it is also cooling it, and it's getting turned into a finer more homogeneous mixture that burns more evenly. On the extreme side of this there are even setups where an IR intake is fed by an injector that's actually above the radius entry to the intake runner (in other words you can watch the fuel spray into the mouth of the intake) Kind of like a Fancy TBI injector only for an individual runner intake... There are also setups that have the injector mid way in the runner facing the wrong direction so it fires BACKWARD into the oncoming air stream, to break up the spray droplets with the shearing forces.

In my opinion one of the reasons Carburetors still dominate drag racing is that the cooling effects of many types of race fuel cooling the entire intake charge from the Carb on down is a significant benefit outweighing the slight displacement of air. Whereas most port injection setups will have a dry (and hot) manifold... Under normal part throttle conditions with normal street gasoline, this is not big deal and the perfect idle and fast starting and better fuel efficiency of port injection, wins hands down. At Wide Open Throttle with better fuels, the better mixture, and the cooling effect wins out for power.
--
Simon
Looking for a 232 crankshaft see my want ad: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1292
http://www.jeepstrokers.com 94 XJ Stroked lifted locked. 89 MJ restored Work truck, 88 YJ going on third build up and second Stroker.
User avatar
amcinstaller
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 609
Joined: May 22nd, 2008, 11:57 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1980
Vehicle Make: AMC
Vehicle Model: Spirit
Location: Red Deer, AB, Can

Re: Open Discussion-Cam Advance/Retard

Post by amcinstaller »

i wasnt sure the firing on the 4.0 stock ecu, but i know a few aftermarket ecus are a batch fire. (ex. megasquirt) simply a point to try and help
1980 AMC Spirit Restomod in Progress
SilverXJ wrote:Roller rockers won't help that mess you have created. Nor will God for that matter.
jsawduste
My keyboard is getting warn out
My keyboard is getting warn out
Posts: 1032
Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.9
Location: Michigan

Re: Open Discussion-Cam Advance/Retard

Post by jsawduste »

[quote="Mgardiner1"]Turning the dizzy simply changes the timing events of when the CMP goes high and low. If the flywheel (CKP) sequence for #3 has entered its timing notches, or # 5 has not yet finished, the ECU gets confused and does not know which cylinders is to be fired next, creating a rough running situation. I had a several page thread going on how my engine was breaking up at a very specific RPM range, but idled smooth and revved up to 2500 RPM smooth, but from 2500 to 3000 it would cough and miss and break up, over 3000 was ok. I adjusted my dizzy as per some help with a member on here, and it completely solved my issues. It just had to do with the sequence of events between the CMP and CKP.

Side note
Interesting as this is an "event" I run into also. The strange part is that it is not always present. Reducing fuel pressure seemed to help, a little. Just a little lower mid range stumble as the engine seems to be "coming up on the cam" Best way to describe it would be that the engine feels a little loaded up for a couple of seconds. Then clears its throat and moves on.

Still plan on taking a look at modding a CKP for more timing and trying a lower octane fuel to see if we can tolerate a faster flame front.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 23 guests