Stroker Horsepower & Torque Numbers VS. Small Block V8's
Posted: February 20th, 2008, 9:51 pm
Lots of arguments out there in Jeep land about the value of stroking the 4.0. Often versus swaping in a late model V8. I think the following numbers confirm what most of us know. A 4.0 stroker is a great inexpensive way to end up with a fresh engine, that puts out better than small block power and torque with the stock drive train and wiring.
For those that can't stand to wait, I'll sumerize it this way: The inline stroker has been documented putting out more HP and Torque than either Small block V8 Chevy or Ford pushrod engines in stock trim. Even the ubiquitous 350 which has 1.1 liters on a 4.6 stroker, has lower factory numbers until the LT1 in 93, and even then it's still putting down LESS torque, and with a much steeper torque curve. Out torqueing Small Blocks at peak RPM is not even that impressive; If you consider that At lower RPM's the Inline stroker will make most of these stock V8's look down right limp.
Now for the numbers; These are all flywheel numbers, meaning the output at the wheels will be considerably lower, possibly higher than 25% loss for a 4x4 Jeep with T-case and steep drive line angles, Auto transmission etc.
Stroker Numbers:
* JP Mags Golen 268 hp and 324 ft·lb
* HESCO build * 269 hp and 340 ft·lb
* CDP build ** 265 hp and 295 ft·lb
Foot notes:
*HESCO build Dyno sheet viewable here: http://home.pacbell.net/jay_w007/dyno_sheet_text.html
** http://www.cdpautomachine.com/engines/j ... block.html
I thought I had at least one more Hesco dyno sheet saved from digging around the internet but I can't find it, Dino Savva's site talks about it. If anyone wants to contribute real stroker dyno numbers and has the sheet to back it please PM me and I will give you credit. (Wheel or Flywheel).
Stock 242 (4.0L):
* 1987-1988 XJ 173 hp and 220 ft·lb*
* 1988-1990 XJ 177 hp and 224 ft·lb**
* 1991-2000 XJ 190 hp and 225 ft·lb***
* 2000-2006 XJ 193 hp and 231 ft·lb****
Foot Notes:
* Smaller injectors
** Renix fuel system, low intake port runners, smaller TB, Intake plenum, EGR
*** Very slight variations within these years coresponding to the 0650 head casting, injector changes, fuel pressure and emissions changes
**** New equal length Intake (starting in 99 for the Grand Cherokee, thus "99+ intake")
SBC/GM 305 (5.0L)
* 1982–1983: LU5 5.0L V8, 165–175 hp and 240–250 ft·lb
* 1982–1987: LG4 5.0L V8, 145–170 hp and 240–250 ft·lb
* 1983–1986: L69 5.0L V8, 190 hp and 240 ft·lb
* 1985–1992: LB9 5.0L V8, 190–230 hp and 275–300 ft·lb
* 1988–1992: L03 5.0L V8, 170 hp and 255 ft·lbff
SBC 350 (5.7L)****
* 1987–1992: L98 5.7L V8, 225–245 hp and 330–345 ft·lbff
* 1993-1995: LT1 275 hp and 325 lb·ft
* 1996-1997: LT1 285 hp and 325 lb·ft
SBF 302 (5.0L) [really 4.9]
* 1985-1992 225 hp and 300 ft·lb*
* 1993 GT at 205 hp and 275 ft·lb**
SBF Modular 4.6 ***
* 1996-1997 Ford Mustang, 215 hp and 285 lb·ft
* 1998 Ford Mustang, 225 hp and 290 lb·ft
* 1999-2004 Ford Mustang, 260 hp and 302 lb·ft
Foot Notes:
*Interesting to note that the late 5.0 was a rollerized valve train and pre 93 5.0 had Forged Pistons from the factory.
**The drop in 93 power rating is due to Ford changing how they calculated things and dressed the engine.
*** 2 valve SOHC put in for reference, even though it's not a push rod engine.
**** The LT1 was a Corvette Engine the 98 and later LS1 put out over 300hp and was also nicked from the Corvette. Both are under rated by GM
Factory Numbers will vary according to their own machines and calculations, they will also be inflated and deflated based on corporate politics (a Camaro will never be as powerful as a Corvette, even with the same Engine) Insurance and salesmanship.
Note: There's no doubt nor argument here that SB Ford and Chevy V8's have huge aftermarket support and will be both cheaper and easier to get higher power from. 275-300hp is a few bolt ons away for most any small block V8. This thread is intended to show the value of a Stroker build versus swapping in a stock small block. It is not an argument over which has the most potential for high end power! The stroker gets very expensive very quickly.
For those that can't stand to wait, I'll sumerize it this way: The inline stroker has been documented putting out more HP and Torque than either Small block V8 Chevy or Ford pushrod engines in stock trim. Even the ubiquitous 350 which has 1.1 liters on a 4.6 stroker, has lower factory numbers until the LT1 in 93, and even then it's still putting down LESS torque, and with a much steeper torque curve. Out torqueing Small Blocks at peak RPM is not even that impressive; If you consider that At lower RPM's the Inline stroker will make most of these stock V8's look down right limp.
Now for the numbers; These are all flywheel numbers, meaning the output at the wheels will be considerably lower, possibly higher than 25% loss for a 4x4 Jeep with T-case and steep drive line angles, Auto transmission etc.
Stroker Numbers:
* JP Mags Golen 268 hp and 324 ft·lb
* HESCO build * 269 hp and 340 ft·lb
* CDP build ** 265 hp and 295 ft·lb
Foot notes:
*HESCO build Dyno sheet viewable here: http://home.pacbell.net/jay_w007/dyno_sheet_text.html
** http://www.cdpautomachine.com/engines/j ... block.html
I thought I had at least one more Hesco dyno sheet saved from digging around the internet but I can't find it, Dino Savva's site talks about it. If anyone wants to contribute real stroker dyno numbers and has the sheet to back it please PM me and I will give you credit. (Wheel or Flywheel).
Stock 242 (4.0L):
* 1987-1988 XJ 173 hp and 220 ft·lb*
* 1988-1990 XJ 177 hp and 224 ft·lb**
* 1991-2000 XJ 190 hp and 225 ft·lb***
* 2000-2006 XJ 193 hp and 231 ft·lb****
Foot Notes:
* Smaller injectors
** Renix fuel system, low intake port runners, smaller TB, Intake plenum, EGR
*** Very slight variations within these years coresponding to the 0650 head casting, injector changes, fuel pressure and emissions changes
**** New equal length Intake (starting in 99 for the Grand Cherokee, thus "99+ intake")
SBC/GM 305 (5.0L)
* 1982–1983: LU5 5.0L V8, 165–175 hp and 240–250 ft·lb
* 1982–1987: LG4 5.0L V8, 145–170 hp and 240–250 ft·lb
* 1983–1986: L69 5.0L V8, 190 hp and 240 ft·lb
* 1985–1992: LB9 5.0L V8, 190–230 hp and 275–300 ft·lb
* 1988–1992: L03 5.0L V8, 170 hp and 255 ft·lbff
SBC 350 (5.7L)****
* 1987–1992: L98 5.7L V8, 225–245 hp and 330–345 ft·lbff
* 1993-1995: LT1 275 hp and 325 lb·ft
* 1996-1997: LT1 285 hp and 325 lb·ft
SBF 302 (5.0L) [really 4.9]
* 1985-1992 225 hp and 300 ft·lb*
* 1993 GT at 205 hp and 275 ft·lb**
SBF Modular 4.6 ***
* 1996-1997 Ford Mustang, 215 hp and 285 lb·ft
* 1998 Ford Mustang, 225 hp and 290 lb·ft
* 1999-2004 Ford Mustang, 260 hp and 302 lb·ft
Foot Notes:
*Interesting to note that the late 5.0 was a rollerized valve train and pre 93 5.0 had Forged Pistons from the factory.
**The drop in 93 power rating is due to Ford changing how they calculated things and dressed the engine.
*** 2 valve SOHC put in for reference, even though it's not a push rod engine.
**** The LT1 was a Corvette Engine the 98 and later LS1 put out over 300hp and was also nicked from the Corvette. Both are under rated by GM
Factory Numbers will vary according to their own machines and calculations, they will also be inflated and deflated based on corporate politics (a Camaro will never be as powerful as a Corvette, even with the same Engine) Insurance and salesmanship.
Note: There's no doubt nor argument here that SB Ford and Chevy V8's have huge aftermarket support and will be both cheaper and easier to get higher power from. 275-300hp is a few bolt ons away for most any small block V8. This thread is intended to show the value of a Stroker build versus swapping in a stock small block. It is not an argument over which has the most potential for high end power! The stroker gets very expensive very quickly.