Header style/choose pacesetter vs banks revolver
Posted: June 6th, 2014, 12:25 am
I've got a couple questions. I've got a ceramic coated (swaintech) pacesetter sitting here, as well a banks 6-1 revolver also ceramic coated (banks coating?) whoever banks uses for their coatings idk. I know for sure the banks fits with my 99+ intake! does anyone know if the pacesetter will fit?
I have to redo the downpipe to 2.5" with my banks anyway and the pacesetter has a downpipe although I'd remake it with 2.5" also.. I do know pacesetter has fitment issues with the driveshaft so I'd remake it either way.
I'm seeing this debate as longer tube tri-y design of pacesetter Vs the shorter 6-1 banks revolver style which ends up boosting power at 3500+ rpm. I felt a decrease in power...at least felt that way at around 2000rpm when I installed the banks. The pacesetter sound produce more USEABLE gains in the 2000-5000rpm range I'd think just be design? The banks may peak higher but peaks don't produce a fast, toques car! The banks also changed the exhaust note to a more exotic type sound. I've always said like the sound change from a y/h pipe to a x pipe, because its 6-1 design.
Now this is going on my 4.2l stroker daily driver. I can use either or...so what's your guys opinion?
I did have a ceramic doug thorley but after speaking to them at DT I realized quickly everyone seem to have a snotty attitude going and I sold it before I ever ran it...hence when I got the banks:) the pacesetter was a x-mas gift I had coated and tossed in storage when we moved and forgot all about
I have to redo the downpipe to 2.5" with my banks anyway and the pacesetter has a downpipe although I'd remake it with 2.5" also.. I do know pacesetter has fitment issues with the driveshaft so I'd remake it either way.
I'm seeing this debate as longer tube tri-y design of pacesetter Vs the shorter 6-1 banks revolver style which ends up boosting power at 3500+ rpm. I felt a decrease in power...at least felt that way at around 2000rpm when I installed the banks. The pacesetter sound produce more USEABLE gains in the 2000-5000rpm range I'd think just be design? The banks may peak higher but peaks don't produce a fast, toques car! The banks also changed the exhaust note to a more exotic type sound. I've always said like the sound change from a y/h pipe to a x pipe, because its 6-1 design.
Now this is going on my 4.2l stroker daily driver. I can use either or...so what's your guys opinion?
I did have a ceramic doug thorley but after speaking to them at DT I realized quickly everyone seem to have a snotty attitude going and I sold it before I ever ran it...hence when I got the banks:) the pacesetter was a x-mas gift I had coated and tossed in storage when we moved and forgot all about
