Stroker & Cam. Thoughts?
Posted: February 25th, 2013, 4:01 am
Over the past few weeks I think I've read every single post here; my brain hurts
Upcoming build is:
'94 or '96 4.0L block (see other thread) & accompanying head (0630 or 7120)
Head: self port/cleanup, std valves, springs (depend on cam)
Std oil pump (don't see need for more)
4.0L rods
12cw long snout 258 crank (I have already)
zero deck & .043" gasket=.043" quench
KB 944 or 945 pistons (dependant upon cam choice)
24# injectors
62mm TB & '99+ intake
OBDII with a PM to FlyinRyan
XJ, 4.11's locked, 4.5" lift, 33's touring & offroad, but a revhead at heart
Now the big question is cam.
I've read so much about cam failures & so many appear to be Comp Cams & yet Comp Cams still appear to be mostly recommended
Anyhow I've done some Desktop Dyno 2003 sim's on 4 cams that appear the goods for my needs. The popular Comp's 231-4 & 201-4 & 505 Perf 263/265-14H & 256/256-12F.
The main reason for these comparisons is the relatively late IVC times on the 505 cams allows for a higher SCR, here's the sim's:
Comp 231-4: SCR=9.54, DCR=8.33
Comp 201-4: SCR=9.54, DCR=8.14
505 Perf 263/265-14H: SCR=10.04, DCR=8.33
505 Perf 256/256-12F: SCR=10.48, DCR=8.35
Both the Comp 201-4 & 505 Perf 263/265-14H should run with stock valve springs but the 505cam offers up an extra ~15HP & a little more TQ but not as flat a curve.
I'm leaning toward the 505 Perf 263/265.
I don't see many reports on builds with 505 Performance cams. Is there a reason I've missed?
Thoughts guys?
SilverXJ made a brief comment upon service & product from 505 in another thread, I'd like to know more.
Cheers,
Ruffy.
Upcoming build is:
'94 or '96 4.0L block (see other thread) & accompanying head (0630 or 7120)
Head: self port/cleanup, std valves, springs (depend on cam)
Std oil pump (don't see need for more)
4.0L rods
12cw long snout 258 crank (I have already)
zero deck & .043" gasket=.043" quench
KB 944 or 945 pistons (dependant upon cam choice)
24# injectors
62mm TB & '99+ intake
OBDII with a PM to FlyinRyan
XJ, 4.11's locked, 4.5" lift, 33's touring & offroad, but a revhead at heart
Now the big question is cam.
I've read so much about cam failures & so many appear to be Comp Cams & yet Comp Cams still appear to be mostly recommended
Anyhow I've done some Desktop Dyno 2003 sim's on 4 cams that appear the goods for my needs. The popular Comp's 231-4 & 201-4 & 505 Perf 263/265-14H & 256/256-12F.
The main reason for these comparisons is the relatively late IVC times on the 505 cams allows for a higher SCR, here's the sim's:
Comp 231-4: SCR=9.54, DCR=8.33
Comp 201-4: SCR=9.54, DCR=8.14
505 Perf 263/265-14H: SCR=10.04, DCR=8.33
505 Perf 256/256-12F: SCR=10.48, DCR=8.35
Both the Comp 201-4 & 505 Perf 263/265-14H should run with stock valve springs but the 505cam offers up an extra ~15HP & a little more TQ but not as flat a curve.
I'm leaning toward the 505 Perf 263/265.
I don't see many reports on builds with 505 Performance cams. Is there a reason I've missed?
Thoughts guys?
SilverXJ made a brief comment upon service & product from 505 in another thread, I'd like to know more.
Cheers,
Ruffy.