New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
-
- Learning to use the board
- Posts: 33
- Joined: December 2nd, 2016, 7:02 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.2
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Comanche
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Ok, that sounds great Russ! I'd also like to pick up the 68-235-4 cam on 114° lobe separation angle from you and did you say you make a spacer for the crankshaft snout as Well?
-
- Strong Poster
- Posts: 900
- Joined: August 15th, 2009, 1:27 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Sounds good Josh.
I do make a keywayed billet aluminum spacer for your crankshaft.
Shoot me a call or email and I'll work on gettin some stuff out to ya.
I do make a keywayed billet aluminum spacer for your crankshaft.
Shoot me a call or email and I'll work on gettin some stuff out to ya.
-
- Learning to use the board
- Posts: 33
- Joined: December 2nd, 2016, 7:02 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.2
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Comanche
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Awe man Russ. Now that I'm almost done with my build, i wish that i had gone with forged pistons instead of these SEALED POWER PISTONS (P/N: 677AP+.030)
Dang.
Dang.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: December 4th, 2018, 9:53 am
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: WJ
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
I've been kind of studying this post the last couple days but haven't really noticed any mention of this being done on a WJ.
Is it still possible in this model? Would really like a bit more passing power on the highway, maybe with a little room for some low boost (6-8 PSI, small turbo. Supercharger is not even on my mind) with some decent MPGs.
Is it still possible in this model? Would really like a bit more passing power on the highway, maybe with a little room for some low boost (6-8 PSI, small turbo. Supercharger is not even on my mind) with some decent MPGs.
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3192
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
It's possible on any Jeep model that originally came with a 4.0L I6.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: December 4th, 2018, 9:53 am
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: WJ
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Is there anything special I'd need to do with the crank being that I have the 42RE trans? I know with the AW4 it would need a bit of modification.Cheromaniac wrote: ↑December 4th, 2018, 11:14 pmIt's possible on any Jeep model that originally came with a 4.0L I6.
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3192
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
I don't know the answer to that. You'd probably have to put the 232 and 4.0 cranks side by side to see the differences.
-
- Learning to use the board
- Posts: 33
- Joined: December 2nd, 2016, 7:02 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.2
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Comanche
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Hello all.
Almost done with my stroker here and am wondering:
I have an extra 1999 Cherokee wiring harness and am wondering if it would be worth the pain in the ass if I swap the obd2 into my 92 Comanche? Any performance gain? Also on this 4.2 mini stroker would I gain anything by upgrading to 1:7 rockers, or if I’d just be wasting money. Please advise, thank you!
Almost done with my stroker here and am wondering:
I have an extra 1999 Cherokee wiring harness and am wondering if it would be worth the pain in the ass if I swap the obd2 into my 92 Comanche? Any performance gain? Also on this 4.2 mini stroker would I gain anything by upgrading to 1:7 rockers, or if I’d just be wasting money. Please advise, thank you!
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3192
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Unless you've ported the head and upgraded the valve springs, you won't see any benefit from 1.7 ratio rockers on a 68-235-4 cam that already has a generous amount of valve lift.
As for swapping the OBD II wiring harness and ECU into your '92 Comanche, the biggest benefit will be that the ECU can be custom tuned to improve performance, drivability, and fuel economy.
As for swapping the OBD II wiring harness and ECU into your '92 Comanche, the biggest benefit will be that the ECU can be custom tuned to improve performance, drivability, and fuel economy.
-
- Learning to use the board
- Posts: 33
- Joined: December 2nd, 2016, 7:02 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.2
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Comanche
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Ok, thank you!
My head is extensively ported and polished so that's exciting.
My real question I guess is that is there enough room, piston to valve clearance wise? My piston are slightly out of the hole and quench is at .030 so basically the head gasket thickness.
Thanks for the reply.
My head is extensively ported and polished so that's exciting.
My real question I guess is that is there enough room, piston to valve clearance wise? My piston are slightly out of the hole and quench is at .030 so basically the head gasket thickness.
Thanks for the reply.
-
- Strong Poster
- Posts: 900
- Joined: August 15th, 2009, 1:27 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Fortunately piston to valve clearance isn’t a problem with our Jeep engines. That’s one of the reasons why the Pistons don’t come with valve pockets
Along with the 1.7:1, I also stock 1.65:1 ratio’s that Harland Sharp builds for me on a custom basis for the same price as the OEM 1.6:1 ratio and 1.7:1
Along with the 1.7:1, I also stock 1.65:1 ratio’s that Harland Sharp builds for me on a custom basis for the same price as the OEM 1.6:1 ratio and 1.7:1
-
- Learning to use the board
- Posts: 33
- Joined: December 2nd, 2016, 7:02 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.2
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Comanche
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Once again, YOU DA MAN Russ!
I shall initiate the nickel counting sequence
I shall initiate the nickel counting sequence
-
- Learning to use the board
- Posts: 33
- Joined: December 2nd, 2016, 7:02 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.2
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Comanche
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Any advice for plug gap on this 4.2 wilder mini stroker?
-
- Learning to use the board
- Posts: 33
- Joined: December 2nd, 2016, 7:02 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.2
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Comanche
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Sooooo, do i have to use the $170 fuel pressure regulator that bumps fuel pressure to 44? cant I run injectors that flow 24# @ 39?
please advise.
please advise.
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3192
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: New 4.2L mini-stroker recipes
Your fuel system runs at a fuel pressure of 39psi. If you're aiming at 260-270hp you're going to need injectors that flow 26-27lb/hr at whatever fuel pressure you're going to run.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 1 guest