Something that is bothering me is the flat area on the piston vs. quench effect. Take for instance these pistons:
that piston vs the stock style piston (larger flat area, mirror of head combustion chamber nearly), how does that effect quench? In that piston in the picture above all you have is a small outer ring for quench.
Piston style vs quench area
- SilverXJ
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5790
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Radford, Va
Piston style vs quench area
2000 XJ. 4.6L stroker
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
00+ Viper Coil Swap | CPS Timing Increase Mod | Fabricated Airbox | Dash bezel, Arduino Multigauge & RD Conceal
Eat, breath, drink, sleep, Jeep, drink
- Flash
- I love JeepStrokers.com!!
- Posts: 693
- Joined: February 17th, 2008, 10:45 pm
Re: Piston style vs quench area
with that piston setting at deck hight, quench numbers should be real good.
I thing, i too, will wait for AGRESIVE's explanation as i would only be guessing any ways!
Flash
I thing, i too, will wait for AGRESIVE's explanation as i would only be guessing any ways!
Flash
89 XJ with 300,000 on the original eng
"I've also never completed a motor, yet. My mouth (fingers) is also writing checks my ass can't cash."
"I've also never completed a motor, yet. My mouth (fingers) is also writing checks my ass can't cash."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 19 guests