One of my options
Posted: June 10th, 2008, 9:23 am
When I started planning my stroker build, I was looking at a budget stroker and the kb pistons weren't on the drawing table yet. So this was my plan and I still might go with it.
Cp802 pistons (1.592 comp distance)
258 (5.875 rod)
7120 head (increased combustion chamber 61.4cc, sbc stainless valves)
12 weight crank
Four wheeler magazine did a 4.6 stroker write up. They said they measured the 802 pistons and calculated the ring land groove and came up with total piston cc @ 18.8cc. Using KB's piston calculator I come up with static compression ratio @ 9.588. Using 61cc head, 18.8 piston head volume, .043 gasket thickness, 4.0 gasket bore, 3.905 cylinder bore, 3.895 stroke, .002 deck clearance for a total quench of .045.
DCR= 8.73 using the cam specs for the crane 901 cam (although I WILL NOT use a crane cam) I just wanted to see what dcr I might have.
I can lower the comp ratio a little if I open the quench a little.
Comments?
Cp802 pistons (1.592 comp distance)
258 (5.875 rod)
7120 head (increased combustion chamber 61.4cc, sbc stainless valves)
12 weight crank
Four wheeler magazine did a 4.6 stroker write up. They said they measured the 802 pistons and calculated the ring land groove and came up with total piston cc @ 18.8cc. Using KB's piston calculator I come up with static compression ratio @ 9.588. Using 61cc head, 18.8 piston head volume, .043 gasket thickness, 4.0 gasket bore, 3.905 cylinder bore, 3.895 stroke, .002 deck clearance for a total quench of .045.
DCR= 8.73 using the cam specs for the crane 901 cam (although I WILL NOT use a crane cam) I just wanted to see what dcr I might have.
I can lower the comp ratio a little if I open the quench a little.
Comments?