Chris' XJ stroker project

Project vehicle blogs or "mod diary" specific threads only.. Pics encouraged!!
User avatar
Chris
Learning to use the board
Learning to use the board
Posts: 36
Joined: April 9th, 2008, 9:38 pm
Location: Marion, AR

Re: Chris' XJ stroker project

Post by Chris »

Allright guys, been playing with some more numbers, and I've finally decided to go full bore into this project and spend the extra money...Of course this means it will take longer to complete, and I don't have many patience...lol Here's what I've come up with now.

Bore the block .030 and deck it .030.
Plane head .010
go with the silvolite 2229c pistons and dish them out to 24cc's

With this setup and a .51 HG, it gives me 9.2\:1 CR with .002 better than stock quench.
Or I can go with a .45 HG, and change it to 9.3\:1 CR with .008 better than stock quench.

If someone else runs these numbers, double check my work as I am new to this. Also, is it worth giving up the extra CR for the better quench? Which one is "more important" when it comes to a daily driver driven on 87 octane?
I saw that coming, yet I did nothing to stop it....why do I fear success...

..,====,o00o
//__l_l_,\____\,__
l_---\_l__l---
[]lllllll[]
_(o)_)__(o)_)--o-)_)___
User avatar
gradon
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1353
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: DC

Re: Chris' XJ stroker project

Post by gradon »

Your #'s are right: 9.2:1 with the .051HG, 9.34:1 with the .043HG. You should be able to run on mid-grade with no problem.
User avatar
Chris
Learning to use the board
Learning to use the board
Posts: 36
Joined: April 9th, 2008, 9:38 pm
Location: Marion, AR

Re: Chris' XJ stroker project

Post by Chris »

gradon wrote:Your #'s are right: 9.2:1 with the .051HG, 9.34:1 with the .043HG. You should be able to run on mid-grade with no problem.

:cheers:

but between the 2, am I better to keep the CR down, or work on getting the quench up?
I saw that coming, yet I did nothing to stop it....why do I fear success...

..,====,o00o
//__l_l_,\____\,__
l_---\_l__l---
[]lllllll[]
_(o)_)__(o)_)--o-)_)___
User avatar
seanyb505
Donator
Donator
Posts: 447
Joined: February 16th, 2008, 9:34 am
Stroker Displacement: 280ci
Vehicle Year: 1997
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: West Palm Beach Florida

Re: Chris' XJ stroker project

Post by seanyb505 »

From the research Ive done, getting the quench to around .060"-.040" will help your engine run better than just having a lower CR.
Now I can be like all those other awesome people with more than one Jeep in their sig, but now I have to say one of them is sold:(
97 XJ 4.6
90 MJ 4.0 - sold

I want to have as many Jeeps as children. DD, offroader, drag MJ and another one. 4=4
User avatar
Flash
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 693
Joined: February 17th, 2008, 10:45 pm

Re: Chris' XJ stroker project

Post by Flash »

Chris wrote:Allright guys, been playing with some more numbers, and I've finally decided to go full bore into this project and spend the extra money...Of course this means it will take longer to complete, and I don't have many patience...lol Here's what I've come up with now.

Bore the block .030 and deck it .030.
Plane head .010
go with the silvolite 2229c pistons and dish them out to 24cc's
With this setup and a .51 HG, it gives me 9.2\:1 CR with .002 better than stock quench.
Or I can go with a .45 HG, and change it to 9.3\:1 CR with .008 better than stock quench.
If someone else runs these numbers, double check my work as I am new to this. Also, is it worth giving up the extra CR for the better quench? Which one is "more important" when it comes to a daily driver driven on 87 octane?
Cris, my self, I would go with .045 HG and dish the piston to 26cc(the silvolites have been dish as high as 30cc before) then you would still be .008 better then stock and you compression ratio would be around 9.1.....a much better chance of running on 87

remember, cleaning the combustion chamber of edges and points that can and will cause point of ignition is as important as compression ratio and quench.
Piston need a good looking over for sharp edges after it has been dish also ;)

Flash
89 XJ with 300,000 on the original eng

"I've also never completed a motor, yet. My mouth (fingers) is also writing checks my ass can't cash."
Diamond-x
Noob
Noob
Posts: 18
Joined: August 14th, 2008, 10:47 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L

Re: Chris' XJ stroker project

Post by Diamond-x »

Chris,
Fantastic information concerning quench, CR and lifter shims. I dropped my 4.0 block and head at the shop last week and have been busy running calcs. Not to steal the thread but what CR is acceptable for 87 octane fuel?
Thanks again, great thread.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests