Resizing rods for strokers
Posted: April 8th, 2008, 11:17 am
Aside from other issues in building a stroker, piston travel and it's TDC position in the bore seems problematic. Apparently the 258 crank/rod combo leaves a 4.0 piston sitting down in the bore about .040, which messes up quench. I'm leaving the small chamber/high C.R. thing out of this for now.
You can deck, or have custom pistons made, or just live with it. But, why not have the rods resized to accomodate the .040, as in make the centers further apart? Is .020 each end too much for the existing factory design? I think it would be a lot cheaper than custom pistons if it could be done. Maybe the pin end could take more offset than the crank, but even if it's just a improvement of .020 as a normal machining cost, what could it hurt?
Darn Engine Masters makes me drink coffee and think a lot.
You can deck, or have custom pistons made, or just live with it. But, why not have the rods resized to accomodate the .040, as in make the centers further apart? Is .020 each end too much for the existing factory design? I think it would be a lot cheaper than custom pistons if it could be done. Maybe the pin end could take more offset than the crank, but even if it's just a improvement of .020 as a normal machining cost, what could it hurt?
Darn Engine Masters makes me drink coffee and think a lot.