Page 1 of 1
					
				.903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 7th, 2009, 4:33 pm
				by SilverXJ
				I talked with Lunati and they said that the .903" lifters would work fine in the 4.0L, which takes a .904" lifter. However, now I have advice not to use a .903" lifter.  According to the FSM lifter tolerance is .904"-.9045", lifter bore .9055" to .9065", and lifter to bore clearance at .001" to .0025". 
So, would you advise using a .903" lifter or not?
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 7th, 2009, 5:12 pm
				by Flash
				Why are you considering these lifters?
 what is, interesting about them? or is this the latest idea on getting more oil on the cam?
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 7th, 2009, 6:53 pm
				by SilverXJ
				http://www.lunatipower.com/ProductGroup ... d=28&pid=2
They are the microtrol lifters. It was hard to find a company that has a lifter made in the US. Lunati's lifters and they have better oil control, and can afford less preload than others.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 8th, 2009, 4:51 am
				by dwg86
				Racer Brown sells Stanadyne lifters. They are made in the USA. They are around $60.00 for a set.
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 8th, 2009, 1:58 pm
				by SilverXJ
				oh yeah.. I already have these lifters and trying to figure out if i can use them or not.
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 9th, 2009, 3:56 pm
				by amcinstaller
				if you have custom length pushrods, why couldnt you use these?
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 9th, 2009, 5:02 pm
				by SilverXJ
				Its the diameter, not the height of the lifters.
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 17th, 2009, 7:01 pm
				by SilverXJ
				I just measured the lunati lifters to be .9036" to .9038", which is the same as a set of engine tech lifters and a set of compcam lifters.
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 17th, 2009, 8:56 pm
				by gradon
				Use them already!
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 17th, 2009, 9:40 pm
				by SilverXJ
				LOL.. as soon as I get the cam.
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 19th, 2009, 6:12 pm
				by SilverXJ
				Here is something interesting. I compared a Lunati, a Crower Cam Saver, an OEM, a Comp Cams and an Engine Tech. All measured .9036" to .9038" except the OEM and Crower. They measured .9044" to .9045"
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 19th, 2009, 8:13 pm
				by Muad'Dib
				very interesting...
I would think it all depends on what diameter the bore is in the block...
To big of a clearance could cause what? Lower oil pressure?
			 
			
					
				Re: .903" vs .904" lifter?
				Posted: August 19th, 2009, 8:31 pm
				by SilverXJ
				Given the same bore diameter a smaller lifter will be able to wobble more, but I don't know if that has any effect. Lower oil pressure perhaps. I have ran several of these lifters in the same block and noticed no real oil pressure difference. Even with the Crower Cam savers and their flat spot I noticed no real oil pressure change. I'm not really certain that the size makes that much of a difference considering the majority are of the smaller size and the most commonly used.