Page 13 of 44

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 21st, 2009, 5:50 am
by SilverXJ
Not hung, the transmission is flush with the block/aluminum plate.

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 21st, 2009, 7:12 am
by dwg86
Your Jeep had an aluminum plate between the trans and engine? I don't remember seeing that with automatics, only manual trans.

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 21st, 2009, 7:24 am
by dwg86
Ok this is a stupid question, and I know you probably looked, but did you make sure there isn't a pilot bushing in the end of the crank?

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 21st, 2009, 8:20 am
by SilverXJ
Yes, there is an aluminum on the automatic transmissions too. It covers several large holes in the bell housing that would otherwise be there without it. No pilot bushing. I did compare the stock 4.0L crank with the 4.2L crank and couldn't find any differences in the flex plate mounting flange or end hole that would make any difference.

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 21st, 2009, 7:11 pm
by YJason
X2 on the Aluminum plate with a auto trans. The pilot diameters are on a 4.2 is similar to a 4.0 crank. IIRC the 4.2 had a bushing in it to match the AW4 torque converter pin dia. where the 4.0 crank didn't.

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 21st, 2009, 7:57 pm
by SilverXJ
Bushing? What bushing? I didn't notice a bushing when I was examining the crank, maybe it is needed?

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 22nd, 2009, 1:42 pm
by YJason
IIRC there is a thin walled bushing in the end of the 4.2 crank. I should get my engine back this week sometime and I will double check and get some pics and demensions for you. I remember something about it because I almost pulled it out when I remove the bearing and remember using my digital calipers on it. The ID is .010-.015 larger than the pilot pin on the torque converter.

I can't imagine that being your noise, being that it makes a difference wheteher the engine is hot or cold when it does it.

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 22nd, 2009, 6:30 pm
by SilverXJ
Unless it is used to center the converter.

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 23rd, 2009, 7:51 am
by the_wrench116
this would be very interesting to pin down finally as i'm sure that this could be why the clutch guys don't have this particular racket in there motors. ill buy the guy that fixes silvers problem a beer :cheers: as long as ya take paypal. :D

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 23rd, 2009, 8:51 am
by dwg86
the_wrench116 wrote:this would be very interesting to pin down finally as i'm sure that this could be why the clutch guys don't have this particular racket in there motors. ill buy the guy that fixes silvers problem a beer :cheers: as long as ya take paypal. :D

OK, I'm motivated to find the bushing part number now! :cheers:

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 23rd, 2009, 2:53 pm
by YJason
I got my engine back today, so as promised here are the pics

Bushing

Image

Bushing ID

Image

Bushing OD? (probably 1.032)

Image

TC Pin OD

Image

Crank large bore OD

Image


TC pin flange OD (or whatever you want to call it)

Image

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 23rd, 2009, 5:05 pm
by SilverXJ
Are you sure that isn't the pilot bushing for a manual transmission? IIRC the 4.0L and 4.2L crank have the same measurement in that area.

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 23rd, 2009, 5:15 pm
by YJason
I pulled the needle brg cage out of the bushing.

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 24th, 2009, 6:49 am
by SilverXJ
If it had needle bearings it was meant for something to rotate in it, such as a manual transmission input shaft pilot.

Re: New 4.6L stroker build

Posted: September 24th, 2009, 9:50 am
by YJason
SilverXJ wrote:If it had needle bearings it was meant for something to rotate in it, such as a manual transmission input shaft pilot.
Yes, it had a BA-10 behind it. Thats what made me start mic'ing diameters, I wanted to make sure my auto would go behind it. I thought there was a reason the diameters were so close so I just left the bushing in there.

BTW: My 4.2 crank is from a YJ.