Cam Pictures

Performance mods and Advanced Stroker discussion.
dwg86
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1245
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 6:20 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6
Vehicle Year: 2003
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: Cam Pictures

Post by dwg86 »

I measured both cams 90 degrees from the casting line. The stock cam measured 1.320 dia. and the engle measured 1.260.
User avatar
Plechtan
Donator
Donator
Posts: 667
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 9:00 am
Stroker Displacement: 5.0L 4x4
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Woodstock, IL
Contact:

Re: Cam Pictures

Post by Plechtan »

I was looking at the belt drive, and wanted to see if i could take both cam designs into account. I do not have an older engine so perhaps somebody could help me out.
I assume the front of the block is the same with either design, and when you install an older cam in a newer block, you just do not use the thrust plate. Correct? If this is true the ddimensionfrom the rear of the #1 cam journal to the front ( the width) on a new cam should be the same ddimensionas the if you measure from the rear of the #1 cam journal to the rear face of the cam gear ( part that touches the block) when it is installed. So the width of an old cam #1 journal - the depth of the pocket of the rrearwhere it sits should equal the width of the new cam journal?

Hope this is not too confusing, bit if somebody could measure, i would like to know.
Peter Lechtanski
The worlds Fastest Comanche Prroject
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Cam Pictures

Post by SilverXJ »

Plechtan wrote:I was looking at the belt drive, and wanted to see if i could take both cam designs into account. I do not have an older engine so perhaps somebody could help me out.
I assume the front of the block is the same with either design, and when you install an older cam in a newer block, you just do not use the thrust plate. Correct?
That is correct, yo just unbolt the thrust plate. I assume the bolt holes for the thrust plate are not in the earlier block.
If this is true the ddimensionfrom the rear of the #1 cam journal to the front ( the width) on a new cam should be the same ddimensionas the if you measure from the rear of the #1 cam journal to the rear face of the cam gear ( part that touches the block) when it is installed. So the width of an old cam #1 journal - the depth of the pocket of the rrearwhere it sits should equal the width of the new cam journal?
That should be correct. If I can remember I can compare a later cam to and earlier cam sometime this weekend.

-Chris
User avatar
Plechtan
Donator
Donator
Posts: 667
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 9:00 am
Stroker Displacement: 5.0L 4x4
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Woodstock, IL
Contact:

Re: Cam Pictures

Post by Plechtan »

I have a 2001 block, and an going to use an earlier performance cam. This thread has done a good job of documenting the differences between the cams and the gears, but i would think the timing chain covers are different as well. The older ones should have some kind of thrust button.

I looked on Ebay and they have timing covers, but they only show front views or have the casting numbers. Anybody know the casting number on the one i would need?
Peter Lechtanski
The worlds Fastest Comanche Prroject
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 4 guests