Page 2 of 2

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 5th, 2012, 11:11 am
by ca2a18
This Is what I got on Dyno 332WHP 385TQ :hrhr:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOjE4_tR0j0

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 5th, 2012, 12:58 pm
by CobraMarty
That is impressive!! What was the boost? What displacement?

Re: Stock engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 5th, 2012, 2:14 pm
by ca2a18
CobraMarty wrote:That is impressive!! What was the boost? What displacement?
Also I am surprise for this number :roll:
The boost was 8 PSI only include water injection Meth
Stock engine 4.0L :rockout:

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 5th, 2012, 7:05 pm
by CobraMarty
I don't want to cast doubt but, Stock 4.0L puts out 190HP at the crank, 150-160 rear wheel. 8 pounds boost on a well optimized system with headers, intake, TB, ported head, cam, intercooler will put out 50% increase in HP. That's a well known proven fact. Either the engine is putting out more 'stock' HP, there is more than 8 pounds boost- more like 16-18 pounds or the Dyno is 'very generous' in it's power numbers. What did you use for injectors? What controller? What were your A/F ratios like?

It does sound great reving out.

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 6th, 2012, 2:46 am
by Shorco
sound bad ass :rockout:

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 6th, 2012, 3:11 am
by ca2a18
CobraMarty wrote:I don't want to cast doubt but, Stock 4.0L puts out 190HP at the crank, 150-160 rear wheel. 8 pounds boost on a well optimized system with headers, intake, TB, ported head, cam, intercooler will put out 50% increase in HP. That's a well known proven fact. Either the engine is putting out more 'stock' HP, there is more than 8 pounds boost- more like 16-18 pounds or the Dyno is 'very generous' in it's power numbers. What did you use for injectors? What controller? What were your A/F ratios like?

It does sound great reving out.

At 5.5 PSI of boost I got 275 RWHP 300+TQ and 8 PSI of boost also I got 332 RWHP with 100% meth.
I can't going over 8 PSI because I don't have forged piston and rod also intercooler.
How can I going to 16-18 PSI without these thinks???????? :brickwall:
who made my project name (Shorco) in this forum, his project name GT4202 and have I a look for this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGk_CAVZfZI

The injectors size 36lb, DFI control unit, and A/F ratios 11.6 :wiggle:

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 6th, 2012, 4:07 am
by CobraMarty
Thanks, Very impressive.

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 6th, 2012, 12:45 pm
by ca2a18
CobraMarty wrote:Thanks, Very impressive.
you are welcome bro :cheers:

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: July 17th, 2012, 1:57 pm
by ca2a18
Update :banana:
...........................................

Photo And Video For My Jeep :cheers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UocQzR7T ... e=youtu.be

:rockout:

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: September 30th, 2012, 11:49 am
by ca2a18

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: October 1st, 2012, 3:18 am
by atias
very nice :)


:cheers:

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: October 1st, 2012, 5:39 am
by CobraMarty
Nice numbers.

Next time you are on the dyno, take off the tubing from the throttle body, effectively taking the turbo out of the loop, and do a Naturally Aspirated only (no turbo) dyno pull for comparison.

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: October 1st, 2012, 5:59 am
by SilverXJ
CobraMarty wrote:Next time you are on the dyno, take off the tubing from the throttle body, effectively taking the turbo out of the loop, and do a Naturally Aspirated only (no turbo) dyno pull for comparison.
Wouldn't be full NA. More like NA with a very restricted exhaust.

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: October 1st, 2012, 6:43 am
by CobraMarty
Done before, surprisingly very little difference. With the compressor not compressing, the turbine spins and flows quite well.

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: October 1st, 2012, 8:44 am
by atias
CobraMarty wrote:

Next time you are on the dyno, take off the tubing from the throttle body, effectively taking the turbo out of the loop, and do a Naturally Aspirated only (no turbo) dyno pull for comparison.

i'm not sure if this wont overspin the turbo and can cause damage :( maybe i'm wrong but the better way would be to open the wastgate fully open to bypass the turbine completely


:cheers: