Piggy Back vs. Standalone

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
Post Reply
User avatar
SkylinesSuck
Donator
Donator
Posts: 545
Joined: February 14th, 2009, 11:11 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1998
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler
Location: Northern VA

Piggy Back vs. Standalone

Post by SkylinesSuck »

So I'm heading back to the states from japan (Air Force) in six months and my '98 TJ with a Golen stroker is waiting for me. It's got the gambit of bolt ons, but the only thing on there right now for tuning is a MAP adjuster. I want to spend a little time getting the tune a bit closer to where it should be. Right now it starts out with 14:1 a/f's below 2 grand and down to 11's by red line, and that the best I can get it last time I was home on leave (I've got a wideband). I'm trying to decide right now between an Apexi SAFC style piggy back or something more like a unichip or even megasquirt. I know the SAFC won't touch timing. Is that where most of the gain is found, or would getting the fuel close get me 80% of the way there? Are there any complications to using a SAFC kinda deal with OBDII? I've heard people say the factory ECU tries to learn it's way around the SAFC settings. I've searched around some of the thread, but have only found a couple with results or even butt dyno impressions after different tuning techniques were applied.

I'd like to do more with it in the future, but for right now, I don't want to juggle to many projects. I'm taking my other straight 6 (RB25 in my skyline) home with me to put into a 240sx. No I'm not a ricer/import guy, but I'm in japan, so what do you want? :huh: I'm making somewhere in the neighborhood of 600hp with a Holset HX40 turbo on it now, so it's going to fullfill my go fast needs right in the near future, not the jeep. Still, if I can spend a little time and money on the jeep now while I'm putting other things together and get a substantial gain, I will.
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Piggy Back vs. Standalone

Post by SilverXJ »

I've heard the same thing about OBD II and a piggy back and it just isn't true. I've been running the SAFC II for quite a few years and it never unlearned the settings. Unless you don't want to get it inspected and want to redo your gauges, I would go with the Unichip, PSC1 or SAFC over a Megasquirt. Personally, I would choose the PSC1 as you can tune it yourself. The SAFC works fine for me, but the PSC1 has more points to tune and isn't that much more expensive over the SAFC. Regardless of which you choose, the computer will still be trying to achieve 14.7" AFR in closed loop. These devices only change open loop.
eliv1
I think I'll order a "tab"
I think I'll order a "tab"
Posts: 41
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 11:15 pm

Re: Piggy Back vs. Standalone

Post by eliv1 »

I would also consider the painless system, it sound's very cool and its fully programmable, the only downside is the $$$$!
88 CJ8, 4.5L Stroker ,P&P Head ,Compcam 68-231-4 cam , 4.0L Junkyard MPI , 99 Intake, Borla Header,2.5" Flowmaster + piping,Electric Fans;SUA 4" lift on 33" tires ;4.11's Dana 44 F&R LockRight , High Steer with CTM's ;OBA;Full Cage.
User avatar
amcinstaller
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
I love JeepStrokers.com!!
Posts: 615
Joined: May 22nd, 2008, 11:57 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1980
Vehicle Make: AMC
Vehicle Model: Spirit
Location: Red Deer, AB, Can

Re: Piggy Back vs. Standalone

Post by amcinstaller »

someone here used the painless system. there was a bit of a "to do" about the programming, and another piece was needed. ill see if i can find the thread about it.
1980 AMC Spirit Restomod in Progress
SilverXJ wrote:Roller rockers won't help that mess you have created. Nor will God for that matter.
User avatar
oletshot
Donator
Donator
Posts: 221
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 11:47 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Piggy Back vs. Standalone

Post by oletshot »

It was heartlandoffroad using the painless system. IIRC it was a serial adapter causing problems.
I'm not clever enough to have a clever signature. I'll just steal yours.
'98 XJ 2-door, '94 YJ.
dwg86
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1233
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 6:20 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6
Vehicle Year: 2003
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler

Re: Piggy Back vs. Standalone

Post by dwg86 »

I have been trying to get my head around all of the different controllers and how they work. This will be my first time trying to tune a computer controlled fuel injection (still an old carb guy). So from what I've been reading...the safc II does not use a laptop. You tune using the screen. The psc1 needs a laptop(no screen). Also the safc II will show the air/fuel ratio and the psc1 will need an air/fuel gage. The psc1 is cheaper than the safc II, but need to buy an air/fuel gage using the psc1. So the cost will be about the same?

The unichip is preprogrammed or will need to be programed at a shop the is set up to program them.

Is this correct?
User avatar
SkylinesSuck
Donator
Donator
Posts: 545
Joined: February 14th, 2009, 11:11 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1998
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Wrangler
Location: Northern VA

Re: Piggy Back vs. Standalone

Post by SkylinesSuck »

SAFC doesn't display or read 02 settings. You need a wideband for it also, but you do tune it through the it's own screen. I've never used a PSC1, but you can find used SAFC's for like $100-$200 on ebay.

SilvrXJ, what were you impressions of gains from the SAFC tune?
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: Piggy Back vs. Standalone

Post by SilverXJ »

dwg86, I know of no piggy back that comes with a wideband built in.

I never actually got to point on the previous stroker when I could get it on a dyno and check for gains or mess with the map to see if i could uncover some more power before i ripped that pike out. I do know what it puts the AFRs where it in a safe zone. Maybe on the engine I am building now I will be able to.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 1 guest