Retro engineering

Performance mods and Advanced Stroker discussion.
Post Reply
JeeperJack
Posts: 5
Joined: December 29th, 2018, 11:16 am
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: cherokee

Retro engineering

Post by JeeperJack »

Think before you speak. My. 85 CJ still has the stock 2.71 gears. I want to go to 31 tires. Low end torque is vital. Has anyone ever considered a 4.6 poor mans short block with a slightly reworked 4.2 head? I have a 4v intake and a several sizes of eddie carbs. Smaller ports and valves would enhance low speed velocity. Larger chamber would lower compression just a bit. Just really looking for 1500/ 3000 max torque. Any thoughts?
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3180
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: Retro engineering

Post by Cheromaniac »

I'm not sure why you'd want to build a stroker and have it drinking through a straw (the 4.2 head). A ported 4.0 head will allow the engine to produce more torque across the whole rpm range. Mine produced at least 90% of maximum torque from 1500rpm to 4500rpm (peaked at 3500rpm). The smaller kidney shaped chamber of the 4.0 head has better combustion efficiency resulting in better gas mileage and lower emissions. I suggest you also use an '00+ intake manifold and make an adapter plate to mount the carb.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :mrgreen:
JeeperJack
Posts: 5
Joined: December 29th, 2018, 11:16 am
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: jeep
Vehicle Model: cherokee

Re: Retro engineering

Post by JeeperJack »

Thanks. I concerned about the compression with a poor man's build. 9+ and spark knock is something I'm not wanting to deal with. A better price on the lower comp pistons would be great. What cam did you use?
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3180
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: Retro engineering

Post by Cheromaniac »

I reused my stock '92 cam.
I suggest you go with the modified poor man's using the 4.0L rods and Russ' custom pistons. With a CR in the low 9's and a tight quench, you'll still be able to run 87 octane gas.
The '00+ intake manifold will also help as the curved runner design allows a more homogeneous distribution of the air/fuel mixture to all cylinders.
You might end up spending a bit more but you'll be much happier with the end result.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :mrgreen:
Russ Pottenger
Strong Poster
Strong Poster
Posts: 889
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 1:27 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: Retro engineering

Post by Russ Pottenger »

This ^^^^^
dirtdudeaz
Posts: 6
Joined: April 12th, 2017, 1:12 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.7
Vehicle Year: 1983
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: CJ7

Re: Retro engineering

Post by dirtdudeaz »

You mentioned your gears, almost expecting a question about them. A motor will help get you power, but are there plans to change your gears too? What trans do you have (T-176?)? I think you'll still fight your tall gearing for any low RPM torque you gain in a stoker. Just curious, what type of driving do you do...
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3180
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: Retro engineering

Post by Cheromaniac »

I agree. With 31" tires and a 4.6 stroker, I'd suggest either 3.73 or 4.10 axle gears. They'll make a massive difference compared to the 2.71. Keep in mind that you'll need to change the speedo drive gear in the transmission tail housing to correct for the axle gear change.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 12 guests