Old stroker refresh
-
- Noob
- Posts: 15
- Joined: June 12th, 2010, 8:14 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4.6
- Vehicle Year: 1991
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: YJ
Re: Old stroker refresh
I spent a while chatting with Russ on Friday and I am making progress on my game plan. I am going to buy a set of rods and pistons from Russ and use the head gasket to fine tune the quench. I should be able to dial it in down to the gnats ass! I'm still undecided on CR. I'm convinced that I don't want to be any higher than 9.5, but I'm still not sure why to push it that far. Any reason not to be down around 9-9.25?
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3241
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: Old stroker refresh
To maximize hp/tq and get the best fuel economy, you'll want the highest CR possible that'll allow you to run the engine on your chosen grade of fuel without detonation.YJLopes wrote:I'm convinced that I don't want to be any higher than 9.5, but I'm still not sure why to push it that far. Any reason not to be down around 9-9.25?
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car

-
- Strong Poster
- Posts: 922
- Joined: August 15th, 2009, 1:27 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.7
- Vehicle Year: 2000
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Re: Old stroker refresh
X2,Cheromaniac wrote:To maximize hp/tq and get the best fuel economy, you'll want the highest CR possible that'll allow you to run the engine on your chosen grade of fuel without detonation.YJLopes wrote:I'm convinced that I don't want to be any higher than 9.5, but I'm still not sure why to push it that far. Any reason not to be down around 9-9.25?
Couldn't of said it any better.
Some of my competitors out there are pushing combinations that utilize 27cc full circular dishes with 8.8:1ish static compression ratios normally aspirated.
That's a horrible recipe.
-
- My keyboard is getting warn out
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
- Stroker Displacement: 4.9
- Location: Michigan
Re: Old stroker refresh
Don't forget the cam when deciding on a compression ratio.
IE dynamic vs. static
IE dynamic vs. static
- Cheromaniac
- I live here
- Posts: 3241
- Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
- Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
- Vehicle Year: 1992
- Vehicle Make: Jeep
- Vehicle Model: Cherokee
- Location: Cyprus
- Contact:
Re: Old stroker refresh
Indeed. Full circular dish = no quench area, and no doubt you're referring to the KB421 pistons.Russ Pottenger wrote:Some of my competitors out there are pushing combinations that utilize 27cc full circular dishes with 8.8:1ish static compression ratios normally aspirated. That's a horrible recipe.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 3 guests