Best year block for stroker

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
Post Reply
razoraxis
Posts: 9
Joined: October 13th, 2016, 7:34 pm
Vehicle Year: 1999
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Best year block for stroker

Post by razoraxis »

I have a 99 cherokee I plan on building a stroker for. I was told that the 87-90 blocks were the best for stroking and you could use a 0630 head on them. Is this true? I have a lead on a donor vehicle that is an 89 and Id like to be sure I am doing the right thing before I pick it up.
jsawduste
My keyboard is getting warn out
My keyboard is getting warn out
Posts: 1032
Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.9
Location: Michigan

Re: Best year block for stroker

Post by jsawduste »

Your 99 block is what I would use. If it has the cam retaining plate switching to the pin and spring will open up a much larger range of camshafts.

And yes the heads will interchange.
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3180
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: Best year block for stroker

Post by Cheromaniac »

A 4.0L block of any year will do fine for a stroker build. If I was in your shoes I'd build up the '89 XJ donor into a stroker short block with an aftermarket performance cam, and bolt on the '99 head plus all the '99 ancillaries.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :mrgreen:
jsawduste
My keyboard is getting warn out
My keyboard is getting warn out
Posts: 1032
Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.9
Location: Michigan

Re: Best year block for stroker

Post by jsawduste »

Why ?

Has it ever been definitively proven the RENIX blocks are better ? If so then better then what ?.
razoraxis
Posts: 9
Joined: October 13th, 2016, 7:34 pm
Vehicle Year: 1999
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: Best year block for stroker

Post by razoraxis »

I was told the walls are thicker and it has more zinc I believe it was in the metal. If there is a better year I can wait and find one of a particular year. Was just curious if one year is better then another or they are all the same.
jsawduste
My keyboard is getting warn out
My keyboard is getting warn out
Posts: 1032
Joined: February 28th, 2008, 3:13 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.9
Location: Michigan

Re: Best year block for stroker

Post by jsawduste »

Yet to see proof of a thicker casting. Even if so, so what ?
All the blocks will go +60 and I've built a number of +80's out of OBD1 era blocks.

Zinc is a soft metal. You don't want zinc mixed in your casting pour anymore then you need to. There are better choices of ingredients to choose from. Nickel as an example when blended into the mix offers a bit more hardness.

But again unless your building some odd variant run what you have.
razoraxis
Posts: 9
Joined: October 13th, 2016, 7:34 pm
Vehicle Year: 1999
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: Best year block for stroker

Post by razoraxis »

Thanks for the info
User avatar
gradon
Donator
Donator
Posts: 1353
Joined: February 13th, 2008, 5:33 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4.6/280ci
Vehicle Year: 1996
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: DC

Re: Best year block for stroker

Post by gradon »

The nickel content is supposedly higher j.
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3180
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: Best year block for stroker

Post by Cheromaniac »

jsawduste wrote:Yet to see proof of a thicker casting. Even if so, so what ?
All the blocks will go +60 and I've built a number of +80's out of OBD1 era blocks.
Exactly, and I think the OP meant a higher nickel content in the Renix blocks though I haven't seen any evidence to back that up. AFAIK, all the 4.0L blocks have a high nickel content and that's why they're so durable.
razoraxis
Posts: 9
Joined: October 13th, 2016, 7:34 pm
Vehicle Year: 1999
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: Best year block for stroker

Post by razoraxis »

Thanks for the help. I finally looked at it today. The block has a fair amount of rust on it. The oil pan doesn't look rusted through and the floorboards and the rest of the jeep seem ok. Is the rust on the block a cause for concern or is it normal for the age?

Also it doesnt run, was told starter is bad. Does that matter as Im ripping it apart anyway.

All and all if ok I will pick it up Saturday.
Russ Pottenger
Strong Poster
Strong Poster
Posts: 889
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 1:27 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: Best year block for stroker

Post by Russ Pottenger »

I wouldn't be too worried about the outside of the block.
As long as the engine was sealed up and nothing got in through the throttlebody you should be fine.
User avatar
gonridnu
Movin on up ^
Movin on up ^
Posts: 332
Joined: December 22nd, 2008, 9:36 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1989
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: XJ 2 door

Re: Best year block for stroker

Post by gonridnu »

If you use an HO block instead of your renix block you will need to drill and tap a couple holes on the driver's side of the block to accommodate the ping and other sensors . See my build up for details.

My feelings on what would be the best block are fairly simple. It would be an NVH block. It has more material in the main web area and it has the built in main girdle. The whole idea behind the block was a factory re-design that dealt with the Noise, Vibration, & Harmonics normally associated with a straight 6. Hence the NVH moniker. I sought one out for my build and would do so again. It always makes sense to use the best foundation available and I believe that to be the NVH block. They are plentiful.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 14 guests